CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk | contribs) →UNRWA coercion by Israel: reply to Oneequalsequalsone: {{yeac}} Done! (-) Tag: CD |
Fileyfood500 (talk | contribs) →Civil section: Including Pro-war protests: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Additional source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/13/after-the-unrwa-report-more-accounts-of-israels-torture-in-gaza [[User:Oneequalsequalsone|Oneequalsequalsone]] ([[User talk:Oneequalsequalsone|talk]]) 23:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC) |
:Additional source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/13/after-the-unrwa-report-more-accounts-of-israels-torture-in-gaza [[User:Oneequalsequalsone|Oneequalsequalsone]] ([[User talk:Oneequalsequalsone|talk]]) 23:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
::{{yeac}} Done! [[User:CarmenEsparzaAmoux|CarmenEsparzaAmoux]] ([[User talk:CarmenEsparzaAmoux|talk]]) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
::{{yeac}} Done! [[User:CarmenEsparzaAmoux|CarmenEsparzaAmoux]] ([[User talk:CarmenEsparzaAmoux|talk]]) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Civil section: Including Pro-war protests == |
|||
In Israel, there was significant government criticism for insufficient military response and aggression to eliminate Hamas and free the hostages. This is covered elsewhere in wikipedia, [[Israel–Hamas war protests in Israel#Anti-Palestinian protests]], and is important to present. The current article appears to have a bias presenting the Israeli public as being opposed to war, when in fact, the public favored a decisive response to the invasion by Hamas. Polling found that 57% of respondents were upset about the insufficient use of Israeli firepower in conflict with Hamas and only 10% supported a pause in fighting.<ref>https://time.com/6333781/israel-hamas-poll-palestine/</ref> |
|||
<references /> |
|||
[[User:Fileyfood500|Fileyfood500]] ([[User talk:Fileyfood500|talk]]) 23:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:46, 26 April 2024
UNRWA coercion by Israel
Shouldn't this Reuters article about the UNRWA report, that says Israel coerced some agency employees to falsely admit Hamas links, be included in the International Support > UNRWA section?
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/unrwa-report-says-israel-coerced-some-agency-employees-falsely-admit-hamas-links-2024-03-08/ Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @CarmenEsparzaAmoux,
- Would you be interested in adding this in?
- Additional source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/13/after-the-unrwa-report-more-accounts-of-israels-torture-in-gaza Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done! CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Civil section: Including Pro-war protests
In Israel, there was significant government criticism for insufficient military response and aggression to eliminate Hamas and free the hostages. This is covered elsewhere in wikipedia, Israel–Hamas war protests in Israel#Anti-Palestinian protests, and is important to present. The current article appears to have a bias presenting the Israeli public as being opposed to war, when in fact, the public favored a decisive response to the invasion by Hamas. Polling found that 57% of respondents were upset about the insufficient use of Israeli firepower in conflict with Hamas and only 10% supported a pause in fighting.[1]
Fileyfood500 (talk) 23:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)