m Signing comment by 125.17.228.74 - "" |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Dileepks, Thanks for the clarification. I believe I can get the numbers soon. Till then let it stay. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/125.17.228.74|125.17.228.74]] ([[User talk:125.17.228.74|talk]]) 11:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Dileepks, Thanks for the clarification. I believe I can get the numbers soon. Till then let it stay. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/125.17.228.74|125.17.228.74]] ([[User talk:125.17.228.74|talk]]) 11:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Dileep, the master of Koch hype, the information in the article is referenced which states the employee strength is 8000. Also there is another report here [http://www.hindu.com/2009/05/21/stories/2009052150170100.htm here], which also states that the employee strenght is 8000. If you want to remove, provide more valid reference. Yours Lovingly :-) --[[User:Samaleks|Samaleks]] ([[User talk:Samaleks|talk]]) 15:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:57, 31 March 2011
India: Kerala Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Employee strength in Infopark.
Mr Dileepks, The employee strength figures in Infopark is quite unbelievable. In a report dated 21st may 2009 it is clearly mentioned that the strength is around 8000 (http://www.thehindubusinessline.in/2009/05/21/stories/2009052150781700.htm). There is no proof that employee strength almost doubled to 15000 in hardly one and half years. I believe the latest report is just a figment of imagination from the reporter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.88.239.184 (talk) 09:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Dear IP Editor. There are very many things editors believe, but for Wikipedia, it is the credibility/acceptibility of sources that matters. The Hindu is a reputed news paper, and the figure comes from its reporter. It is clearly reported as a fact, not as an opinion, either of the reporter or a reported party. Such news are routinely accepted as valid reference for articles. I can show you many examples of such use. I can also show you arguments by a number of editors supporting the use of Hindu reports as reference.
- It is a valid reference, as long as another reference contradicts it. Do you have any source that contradicts this number?
- DileepKS(talk) 10:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Dileepks, Thanks for the clarification. I believe I can get the numbers soon. Till then let it stay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.17.228.74 (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Dileep, the master of Koch hype, the information in the article is referenced which states the employee strength is 8000. Also there is another report here here, which also states that the employee strenght is 8000. If you want to remove, provide more valid reference. Yours Lovingly :-) --Samaleks (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)