![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Health section
I've made some edits to the Health section that I thought I would explain here. First, I added a sentence explaining the presence of conspiracy theories in the month before the September incident. While this normally wouldn't merit inclusion per WP:FRINGE, I think it's helps show the significance of the September health episode, especially since this helped to make these theories "go mainstream". I also added some sourced criticism of how the Clinton campaign handled the situation at the time, and updated the source which talks about how Clinton released her health records. FallingGravity 05:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I do not see why it belongs in a controversy section. Controversies sections are poor style and should be the information should be included in the relevant sections. Candidate's health is always a significant issue. TFD (talk) 07:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Gender gap
A recent edit by Frickiewolf about the gender gap was reverted by PeterTheFourth. I would argue that real vote data on the gender gap is more informative than campaign polling. However, for balance, this information should cover all women, not just the white demographic. If the OP can find sources, that would be a welcome addition to the article. — JFG talk 10:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Logo Reversion
Can we get an explanation on why the logo keeps getting reverted to the older "red arrow" version? The newer logo with the blue arrow was used much more frequently in the general election. Basil the Bat Lord (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Was it, really? Do you have a source for this, apart from anecdotal evidence? Also note that the original logo was used for a much longer time span, so people may remember it more. Perhaps we can simply show both of them? — JFG talk 20:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Pizzagate
What controversy? Foaming-at-the-mouth rabid conspiracy story erupting into a Twitter/Instagram/4Chan/Reddit projectile vomiting fest by the usual the "Clinton bodybag" crazies two days before the election and culminating in a Jones fan shooting up a pizza parlor full of customers and staff with an AR-15 assault rifle on December 5, 2016, to "investigate". And the editor who added this gem didn’t even bother to add a source; the reference is a link to an abstract for an article on "Fake News: A Legal Perspective" in the Journal of Internet Law. Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 16:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Fundraising
The context of the cherry-picked, biased quotes from the Washington Post:
As she makes her second White House bid, Hillary Clinton is raising money in a dramatically different environment than her past campaigns. Since then, the Supreme Court has made it easier for wealthy individuals, corporations and unions to spend huge, unregulated sums on political activity.
She has shown a willingness to embrace the new fundraising techniques. This fall, her campaign set up a joint fundraising committee with the Democratic National Committee and 32 state committees that can accept up to $356,100 per year from an individual donor — the first 2016 candidate to pursue such a tactic. And, unlike Sanders, she has sanctioned big-money super PACs working on her behalf, including one coordinating directly with her campaign.
That has given the senator from Vermont an opening.
Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Job Offer to Seth Rich from the Hillary Clinton Campaign
Hello, My efforts to add factual information and sources on the job offer from the Hillary Clinton campaign to Seth Rich (in the Seth Rich Murder article) have been rebuffed. Is it permissible to discuss it here for possible addition to Hillary Clinton Presidential Campaign, 2016? I understand that many people don't know about it, or believe that it is a conspiracy theory, but it is documented, and from Seth Rich's parents.
A video from Seth Rich's father:
"He had just been asked to join the Clinton campaign, four days before he was murdered." (and then later) "He had just found out that they wanted him."
I was told by an editor of the other article that dailymail could not be used as a Wikipedia reference, but the video is of Seth Rich's father making the above quotes.
Add this to the undisputed reference:
His parents informed The Washington Post:
"On the day he was murdered, Seth was excited about a new job he had been offered on Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign." and continued "To those who sincerely want to get to the bottom of Seth’s murder, we don’t hold this against you."
and this fact was then reported on CNN:
"Before Rich died, he had been offered a new job on Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign"
reference: https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/24/us/seth-rich-dnc-wikileaks-theories/index.html
can this ever be included in either the "People" or "Controversies" section of this article? StreetSign (talk) 03:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)