Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk | contribs) |
Raymond3023 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC) |
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
== RfC about inserting content and category about pseudoscience == |
|||
{{rfc|hist|reli|sci}} |
|||
Should we include content and category describing Faith healing as a pseudoscience? [[User:Raymond3023|Raymond3023]] ([[User talk:Raymond3023|talk]]) 18:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
===Survey=== |
|||
* '''Support''' - I had added it years ago[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=717518002] but my edits were quickly removed.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faith_healing&diff=next&oldid=717518002] But the fact remains that when much older and sophisticated medical systems like [[Ayurveda]], [[Traditional Chinese medicine]], etc. are categorized and described in their articles as pseudoscience, then Faith healing is clearly not an exception. There are enough reliable sources[https://books.google.com/books?id=Fit9rjXiLBUC&pg=PA217&dq=faith+healing+pseudoscience&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjGnZyNt9DZAhXFmZQKHSWnD6AQ6AEIODAD#v=onepage&q=faith%20healing%20pseudoscience&f=false][https://books.google.com/books?id=vnWE00YVeJQC&pg=PA625&dq=faith+healing+pseudoscientific#v=onepage&q=faith%20healing%20pseudoscientific&f=false][https://books.google.com/books?id=n3XXiSyBuKYC&pg=PA16&dq=one+practical+reason+pseudoscience+faith+healing%27s&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjXkOyXuNDZAhVClJQKHXyEAPsQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=one%20practical%20reason%20pseudoscience%20faith%20healing's&f=false][https://books.google.com/books?id=Pc4OAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA30&dq=Faith+healing+pseudoscience&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwigw6Dxt9DZAhVEtJQKHZ9JB1wQ6AEIRjAG#v=onepage&q=Faith%20healing%20pseudoscience&f=false][https://books.google.com/books?id=GahwviSqjC4C&pg=PA86&dq=faith+healing+pseudoscience&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjM-N-6uNDZAhVMG5QKHaGGAYA4ChDoAQhVMAk#v=onepage&q=faith%20healing%20pseudoscience&f=false][https://books.google.com/books?id=JXWhBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA96&dq=Faith+healing+Pseudoscience&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Faith%20healing%20Pseudoscience&f=false] that describe Faith healing as pseudoscience, more often than those who call Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese medicine a pseudoscience. [[User:Raymond3023|Raymond3023]] ([[User talk:Raymond3023|talk]]) 18:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
* |
|||
===Threaded discussion=== |
|||
* |
|||
* |
Revision as of 18:25, 3 March 2018
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do not merge Supernatural healing, since this is religious, and the other is non religious.
There is a difference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.50.54 (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep separate See Medical Subject Heading "Spiritual Therapies" at United States National Library of Medicine website where "Spiritual Therapies" category is a subcategory of "Complementary Therapies" and contains several categories including "Faith Healing", "Magic", "Medicine, African Traditional", "Yoga", and others. "Supernatural healing" is not a Medical Subject Heading. The subject heading distinctions seem to be that "Spiritual Therapies" are "Mystical, religious, or spiritual practices performed for health benefit" while the subcategory "Faith Healing" is "use of faith and spirit to cure disease". Faith is a belief without proof – it may be a belief about natural or supernatural. –BoBoMisiu (talk) 19:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Supernatural healing really ought to be a category rather than an article. There's not a lot in the current article and what sources I can find tend to go into the specifics of the individual healings rather than any broad overarching details. SPACKlick (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Faith healing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011062659/http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/define.pdf to http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/define.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I just noticed...
that Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty has a page, FWIW. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
I full-protected for 24 hours so everyone could take a breath and look at this other page maybe and have a think about how to proceed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Video Testimonials
Anyone have any thoughts about adding some links to this article for videos of people testifying about miraculous healings they have received? DoctorG (talk) 01:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Doctorg, depending of what you're thinking about, adding something to the external links section might be doable. Wikipedia:External links has guidance on what is considered ok. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Faith healing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619054947/http://www.etiennevermeersch.be/artikels/pseudo_wet/wetenschappelijke-aprioris-tegen-het-paranormale to http://www.etiennevermeersch.be/artikels/pseudo_wet/wetenschappelijke-aprioris-tegen-het-paranormale
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111126145744/http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16117269 to http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16117269
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2206&dat=19580119&id=4bwyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JewFAAAAIBAJ&pg=631,1236440
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
RfC about inserting content and category about pseudoscience
Should we include content and category describing Faith healing as a pseudoscience? Raymond3023 (talk) 18:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Survey
- Support - I had added it years ago[1] but my edits were quickly removed.[2] But the fact remains that when much older and sophisticated medical systems like Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese medicine, etc. are categorized and described in their articles as pseudoscience, then Faith healing is clearly not an exception. There are enough reliable sources[3][4][5][6][7][8] that describe Faith healing as pseudoscience, more often than those who call Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese medicine a pseudoscience. Raymond3023 (talk) 18:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)