→7 March edits: new section Tag: New topic |
Binksternet (talk | contribs) →7 March edits: serving the reader |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
{{u|Binksternet}}, per BRD please make the case for including these two controversies [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ExxonMobil&curid=18848197&diff=1143500523&oldid=1143469547]. My argument against the first is quite easy, the 2022 comments by Biden are political posturing. Why are they more DUE than any other similar comments made at other times? Why would we think they would pass the 10YEAR test the way say a major oil spill would? The second one is, in effect, an allegation. What if the lawsuit ends in victory for EXXON? Do we keep it in? In general with a company as large as this we need to see that the lawsuit had some sort of impact before putting it into the summary article. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 03:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC) |
{{u|Binksternet}}, per BRD please make the case for including these two controversies [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ExxonMobil&curid=18848197&diff=1143500523&oldid=1143469547]. My argument against the first is quite easy, the 2022 comments by Biden are political posturing. Why are they more DUE than any other similar comments made at other times? Why would we think they would pass the 10YEAR test the way say a major oil spill would? The second one is, in effect, an allegation. What if the lawsuit ends in victory for EXXON? Do we keep it in? In general with a company as large as this we need to see that the lawsuit had some sort of impact before putting it into the summary article. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 03:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
:The record earnings story got much wider coverage than may be gleaned from the CNBC and CNN sources cited in the paragraph. There's also [https://www.npr.org/2023/01/31/1152776315/exxon-mobil-earnings-chevron-big-oil-biden-windfall-tax NPR], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/01/31/oil-profits-chevron-exxonmobil-earnings/ WaPo], [https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/exxonmobil-chevron-record-q3-profits-oil-price-surge Fox Business], [https://www.forbes.com/sites/sergeiklebnikov/2022/06/08/exxon-mobil-shares-hit-all-time-high-as-oil-and-gas-prices-keep-surging-with-no-end-in-sight/ Forbes], [https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/exxon-post-best-results-seven-years-oil-prices-2022-02-01/ Reuters], [https://www.newsweek.com/exxonmobil-chevron-profits-gas-prices-inflation-recession-1729056 Newsweek], [https://www.ft.com/content/2bfced8a-f221-4100-a0b1-f18ec230bc21 Financial Times], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/29/business/exxon-chevron-profit.html The New York Times] and more. Removing that stuff isn't serving the reader. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 03:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:55, 8 March 2023
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exxon Valdez Spill
Occurred in 1989 NOT in 1979… 2600:100D:B04F:CF23:8D84:F7D:9999:812A (talk) 05:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Fixed, thanks. Larataguera (talk) 12:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Number of employees
Can't find the number of employees in Reference 4. Add slide number? 2A02:1812:1126:5D00:E58E:8E81:FAB:F368 (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
7 March edits
Binksternet, per BRD please make the case for including these two controversies [1]. My argument against the first is quite easy, the 2022 comments by Biden are political posturing. Why are they more DUE than any other similar comments made at other times? Why would we think they would pass the 10YEAR test the way say a major oil spill would? The second one is, in effect, an allegation. What if the lawsuit ends in victory for EXXON? Do we keep it in? In general with a company as large as this we need to see that the lawsuit had some sort of impact before putting it into the summary article. Springee (talk) 03:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- The record earnings story got much wider coverage than may be gleaned from the CNBC and CNN sources cited in the paragraph. There's also NPR, WaPo, Fox Business, Forbes, Reuters, Newsweek, Financial Times, The New York Times and more. Removing that stuff isn't serving the reader. Binksternet (talk) 03:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)