GA on hold — Notes left on talk page.
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Project Devon
Hello! I'm trying to start up a wikiproject:Devon, to create and improve articles about Devon (Cornwall already has one...) follow this link and add your name if you wish: [1]. Cheers! Totnesmartin 22:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
External links
The following two sites have been repeatedly added to Exmoor and other articles related to Exmoor e.g. Minehead
- www.visit-exmoor.eu
- www.visit-exmoor.info
Repeated posting of these commercial links have already resulted in one user's account being blocked for spamming - 85.70.123.202 (talk · contribs). visit-exmoor.eu is a list links to a number of commercial enterprises on Exmoor such as hotels, restaurants and holiday accommodation - and is very clearly linkspam. visit-exmoor.info contains very similar information buried among some more useful tourist information. As there is already a link to the DMOZ category on Exmoor which contains a number of commercial links, there is no need to have any more such external links within the article itself. Please do not add them to the article, they will be removed. Repeated insertion will be reported an may result in blocking. --Cheesy Mike 17:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Just to say that I completely agree with Mike - this is not a USA v UK issue, these are links that are not appropriate to this article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a web directory - thanks --Herby talk thyme 18:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Good Article Assessment
This is my assessment of the (revision) in which the article was reviewed. Preceeding edits had succeeded in providing sources for claims marked with the fact tag. Below is my findings:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- (No edit wars etc.)
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
Further analysis:
- Image used is appropriately captioned and has no copyright violation etc. outstanding on or in it's history.
- References are various, well placed (i.e used appropriately and compliant with MOS) and are reliable.
- I can find no original research and all soures use the {{cite web}} template.
- Hardly any grammar, spelling mistakes.
- Only one issue I can bring up:
- Just a few references are missing