Rv. The Druze as a religious group do not fall under this subject. Otherwise go ahead and tag Judaism and Islam first. |
97.87.61.73 (talk) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== I reverted this edit == |
== I reverted this edit == |
||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Druze&action=historysubmit&diff=342654176&oldid=342471930] I saw it as |
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Druze&action=historysubmit&diff=342654176&oldid=342471930] I saw it as indisputable vandalism. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 07:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
4:20 [[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) What is Supreme Deliciousness? [[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 4:20 |
|||
If you mean the death of human individuals you are a sick and vile. All humans must live in harmony in order to repair the damages already done to mother earth. I would like all peoples to reconcile their differences and realize what one truly has - uninhibited knowledge. Yes my son - we all have this. A drive to do good - a swagger if you will. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)What is Supreme Deliciousness?[[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Exactly. Perverted twisted minds come up with ways to instill fear within the masses. Its called terrorism, and when you use Wikipedia: its known as cyber-terrorism. I'm watching you and I don't like what I see. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)What is Supreme Deliciousness?[[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
You tell me. Why must you terrorize the terrorizable? It is just too easy. Like taking candy from a baby, but you still post indisputably negative cyber-vandalism, and it is not appreciated. If you truly want someone to die, who is more accessible then yourself? Now we are back to the death of human individuals. If one means the death of human individuals one is sick and vile. I still appreciate your opinion though, but don't post indisputably negative cyber-vandalism such as and I quote, "Supreme Deliciousness." |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)What is Supreme Deliciousness?[[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Supreme deliciousness to me is finding something that you truly love, and devoting your life to it. For instance, at this very moment I am realizing how much I love to write. |
|||
In conclusion, |
|||
Stay out of this realm you wretch, your wicked ideas are not going to be accepted here. Wikipedia is a happy place, not one where you threaten others. Yes by posting, "([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]])," you are indisputably vandalizing Wikipedia and it's partners. This website is not made for terror, it is made for LEARNING. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/97.87.61.73|97.87.61.73]] ([[User talk:97.87.61.73|talk]]) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Palestinian resistance == |
== Palestinian resistance == |
Revision as of 07:42, 24 November 2010
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I reverted this edit
[1] I saw it as indisputable vandalism. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
4:20 97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) What is Supreme Deliciousness? 97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 4:20
If you mean the death of human individuals you are a sick and vile. All humans must live in harmony in order to repair the damages already done to mother earth. I would like all peoples to reconcile their differences and realize what one truly has - uninhibited knowledge. Yes my son - we all have this. A drive to do good - a swagger if you will.
97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)What is Supreme Deliciousness?97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Exactly. Perverted twisted minds come up with ways to instill fear within the masses. Its called terrorism, and when you use Wikipedia: its known as cyber-terrorism. I'm watching you and I don't like what I see.
97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)What is Supreme Deliciousness?97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
You tell me. Why must you terrorize the terrorizable? It is just too easy. Like taking candy from a baby, but you still post indisputably negative cyber-vandalism, and it is not appreciated. If you truly want someone to die, who is more accessible then yourself? Now we are back to the death of human individuals. If one means the death of human individuals one is sick and vile. I still appreciate your opinion though, but don't post indisputably negative cyber-vandalism such as and I quote, "Supreme Deliciousness."
97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)What is Supreme Deliciousness?97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Supreme deliciousness to me is finding something that you truly love, and devoting your life to it. For instance, at this very moment I am realizing how much I love to write.
In conclusion,
Stay out of this realm you wretch, your wicked ideas are not going to be accepted here. Wikipedia is a happy place, not one where you threaten others. Yes by posting, "(talk)," you are indisputably vandalizing Wikipedia and it's partners. This website is not made for terror, it is made for LEARNING.
97.87.61.73 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Palestinian resistance
That would be against the Israeli occupation: [2] --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 10:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Palestinian Territories
Why do you put Israel/Palestine if the Druzes live in Galilea, Haifa and Golan? That's not the Palestinian territories, so you shouldn't put Israel/Palestine as they were the same land...--Enkiduk (talk) 07:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Opening sentence
The Druze...are a religious community found primarily in Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and Jordan, whose traditional religion is said to have begun as an offshoot of Islam, but is unique in its incorporation of Gnosticism, Neoplatonism and other philosophies, similar to other followers of Ismaili Shi'a Islam.
Such is the opening sentence. But it doesn't make any sense. Other followers of Ismaili Shi'ism don't incorporate Gnosticism and Neoplatonism, do they? And if they do, then in what sense are the Druze unique? There's some serious clarity problems here. john k (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- well john the Druze are originally Ismaili's and still maintain a lot of similarities with other Ismaili branches and the most important similarity between the druze and other Ismailis and what makes them unique is that they incorporate religion with philosophy, now in the intro I think the "other followers" is intended to signify this point in other words the Ismaili's including the druze are unique when it comes to this point.
- And here is a google query about the relation between Gnosticism, Neoplatonism & ismailism:
« Hiram111ΔTalK Δ 11:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Ethnics of the druze
The druze are converted turks, they had two families (cete) of warriors who were stationed in lebanon, the taniklar and the aslanlar. Both names are turkish. And at that time (around 1100-1200) most warriors were turkic. Also if you look at druze, they have these turkish moustaches and spliteyes besides looking like a stereotypical anatolian white turk. It is highly likely that they evolved to be an ethnical turkish/greek group of converts that embraced islam from christianity but continued to use some form of greek/christian culture/philosofy etc, after intermarriage occured between turkic male descendants of these two families with their own distinctive culture with the greeks of that time alexandretta. There were at that time a lot of greeks there in the region. 77.249.201.75 (talk) 23:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- No, they aren't. The two main groups of Druze are Syrian and Arabian. Today many are mixed, so you get to see some dark skinned Druze with blue eyes. TFighterPilot (talk) 09:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
POV of Golan Heights
This article smacks of POV with the Golan Heights placed in Syria. Israel annexed the Golan Heights following the Six Day War with the 1981 Golan Heights Law and all of its resident may carry Israeli citizenship. That being said I don't think we should make claims on Golan's country either way in this article and instead have it as a separate entry from both Israel and Syria. Valley2city‽ 17:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Who but hardcore Zionists would not regard Golan as Syrian territory? We don't want fringe[3] views to affect the article. FunkMonk (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think we should consider this a fringe theory. The Golan Heights is de facto part of the State of Israel. Whether or not a lot of people consider it occupied territory, it does not belong in the article and instead we should not attach a state to it on Wikipedia just like we usually don't for Jerusalem or locations in the West Bank. Valley2city‽ 12:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
How is it pov to say that the Golan Heights is in Syria when its internationally recognized as being in Syria? Israels control of the territory is an occupation and whatever "extending of laws" Israel has proclaimed has no valid effect:[4] Also it doesn't matter what the citizenship of the Israeli settlers is since they're presence in Golan is illegal:[5] and they are not the owners of the land. Its not a "claim" to say that its in Syria - its a fact. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I will concede here that consensus is pretty against me here and I will stop after this. I'm trying to avoid a political argument (In fact my position on the issue is that I'm trying to make this article apolitical and remove a state title entirely) But to reiterate, de jure and de facto are two different things. De jure, international entities may be pretty against Israel's control of the Golan. However de facto, whether you like it or not Israel controls and governs it[6] (moreso than they do the West Bank which are only Israeli territories as opposed to Golan and Jerusalem which are annexed) and the residents are granted Israeli passports andIsraeli citizenship unlike the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza who do not, but claiming in the article that Golan is part of Syria denies the fact that Israel controls it. We're just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. Valley2city‽ 16:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Druze a lost tribe of the Jews ?
Here is an interesting article that claims that the Druze are actually descended from the Jews. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/140251 -- Alexey Topol (talk) 20:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- I saw that too and added it. His evidence is weak, but worth noting as speculation at least.--Metallurgist (talk) 22:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)