Content deleted Content added
Factomancer (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:: And, yes, blanking sourced material without any legitimate justification is vandalism. [[User:Factsontheground|Factsontheground]] ([[User talk:Factsontheground|talk]]) |
:: And, yes, blanking sourced material without any legitimate justification is vandalism. [[User:Factsontheground|Factsontheground]] ([[User talk:Factsontheground|talk]]) |
||
:::Factsontheground, your edit is very interpretive one and in any case not in agreement with most sources. At least no in the way you put it. So, it was not vandelism done by Mbz1 and again, please avoid wikidrama.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa|talk]]) 14:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:40, 22 March 2010
Stop removing sourced content Mbz1
How can you possibly justify your vandalistic page blanking? Factsontheground (talk) 13:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- I did not blank the page. I removed your POV edit. How about putting in " Shamir discovers a noteworthy incident, in which African-Americans have stoned a Jewish school bus."? I am not interested in working on the article, but if you are please avoid POV and calling my edits "vandalistic"--Mbz1 (talk) 13:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- If you are not interested in working on the article, kindly leave it alone and stop reverting sourced material simply because it does not suit your agenda.
- And, yes, blanking sourced material without any legitimate justification is vandalism. Factsontheground (talk)