Content deleted Content added
Worldtraveller (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
M. Dingemanse (talk | contribs) I just started thinking that GA and these kind of articles are simply incompatible |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. [[User:Worldtraveller|Worldtraveller]] 16:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
:Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. [[User:Worldtraveller|Worldtraveller]] 16:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. [[User:Worldtraveller|Worldtraveller]] 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
:...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. [[User:Worldtraveller|Worldtraveller]] 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
::Ah, I just started thinking that GA and these kind of articles are simply incompatible (there isn't much to expand when you've pretty much exhausted all published sources). — [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|✎]] 16:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:46, 22 February 2006
Sundar's comments
Very informative article. -- Sundar (talk • contribs) 09:10, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
Failed GA
Sorry, I just don't think there's enough here to make this a Good Article. Keep at it, though! —BorgHunter ubx (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. Worldtraveller 16:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- ...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. Worldtraveller 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)