Content deleted Content added
Worldtraveller (talk | contribs) |
Worldtraveller (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{GA}} |
||
== Sundar's comments == |
== Sundar's comments == |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Sorry, I just don't think there's enough here to make this a Good Article. Keep at it, though! —[[User:BorgHunter|BorgHunter]] <sup><s>[[User:BorgHunter/AntiUBX|ubx]]</s></sup> ([[User_talk:BorgHunter|talk]]) 16:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
Sorry, I just don't think there's enough here to make this a Good Article. Keep at it, though! —[[User:BorgHunter|BorgHunter]] <sup><s>[[User:BorgHunter/AntiUBX|ubx]]</s></sup> ([[User_talk:BorgHunter|talk]]) 16:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. [[User:Worldtraveller|Worldtraveller]] 16:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
:Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. [[User:Worldtraveller|Worldtraveller]] 16:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. [[User:Worldtraveller|Worldtraveller]] 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:34, 22 February 2006
Sundar's comments
Very informative article. -- Sundar (talk • contribs) 09:10, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
Failed GA
Sorry, I just don't think there's enough here to make this a Good Article. Keep at it, though! —BorgHunter ubx (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. Worldtraveller 16:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- ...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. Worldtraveller 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)