This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParapsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Super556 and 82.132.214.149, This little edit war is a bit inappropriate. Please discuss on the talk page. Remember the "D" in WP:BRD. I can find zero evidence that this journal article was in any way retracted or that any correction was issued. If it was, what part was corrected, and does it affect the part of article that still cites this article? 0x0077BE(talk · contrib) 23:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not a biography
I wanted to gain an impression of Dean Radin's life and work to date but, as it now is, this bio appears to be little more than a chance to put forward criticism of Radin and his career.
Criticism has its place but this page does seem to be unable to state anything positive at all and is therefore rendered one-sided, inadequate and, regrettably, unworthy of publication by Wikipedia.
I agree entirely. Hostile sceptics have taken over this page en masse, as so often happens here. --Brian Josephson (talk) 20:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you folks have "anything positive at all" which is properly sourced, add it. Your problem seems to be that there is a lot of properly sourced criticism, but little positive of value. The "hostile sceptics" only prevent addition of fluff and nonsense from the paranormal subculture that wants to play at science. --Hob Gadling (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The trouble is not so much the absence of anything positive, but that whatever it is the sceptics will dig up something negative relating to it. The issue of whether the attack is justified or not counts as Original Research and is blocked. --Brian Josephson (talk) 13:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources Brian. You have been told many times. best. -Roxy the elfin dog .wooF 13:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One of those 'hostile sceptics' suddenly leaps into view, in full daylight. Fantastic! --Brian Josephson (talk) 13:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your fingers gave the game away — while focussed on social distancing, you unconsciously typed your WP name!--Brian Josephson (talk) 13:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]