Content deleted Content added
Unscintillating (talk | contribs) |
Unscintillating (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*I documented a similar situation recently in which you removed sourced information claiming WP:V as a justification. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
*I documented a similar situation recently in which you removed sourced information claiming WP:V as a justification. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
*Something that people want to know here is what it is that you think is uncited. One of your edits changed the tenant count from 70 to 60, which is new information, yet you did not add a source. Meanwhile the edit comment for that edit talks about removals for WP:V. People don't know what you are trying to do. And then when I come along and start to clean up the confusion, you go manic. You need to use Template:CN tags instead of just removing material that you don't like, and templating the worker bees, in the hopes of improving your chances of winning at AfD. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
*Something that people want to know here is what it is that you think is uncited. One of your edits changed the tenant count from 70 to 60, which is new information, yet you did not add a source. Meanwhile the edit comment for that edit talks about removals for WP:V. People don't know what you are trying to do. And then when I come along and start to clean up the confusion, you go manic. You need to use Template:CN tags instead of just removing material that you don't like, and templating the worker bees, in the hopes of improving your chances of winning at AfD. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
*I think we can agree (one can hope that we are able to agree about something), that the section "Stores and Services", and the last sentence of the lede that only lists tenants can be removed as per WP:TENANTS. Do you agree? [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*For the remaining sourcing concerns that you have, do you agree to add Template:CN tags? [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:15, 2 July 2014
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
stable version of article restored due to 2nd edit conflict in the context of unsourced additions citing WP:BURDEN
I've been trying to edit the article tonight, but another editor has been reacting to my edits without sufficient explanation. So I'm starting this talk page discussion. Unscintillating (talk) 04:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Reply: If you do a Google search on ["Chris Savard" Cornwell square], the fourth link from the top is [1]. Unscintillating (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- I already discussed this with you at length on your talk page. You have repeatedly violated wp:burden. Even with blp info. You have ignored and failed to respond to all warnings. See [2] and [3] and [4] referring to this, and here. And all edit summaries that accorded with them. And just continued to violate wp:burden. --Epeefleche (talk) 04:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think people realize that templates are not "at length" discussion. In fact, templating my talk page as you have done (five times now) is considered to be uncivil. Unscintillating (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- I documented a similar situation recently in which you removed sourced information claiming WP:V as a justification. Unscintillating (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Something that people want to know here is what it is that you think is uncited. One of your edits changed the tenant count from 70 to 60, which is new information, yet you did not add a source. Meanwhile the edit comment for that edit talks about removals for WP:V. People don't know what you are trying to do. And then when I come along and start to clean up the confusion, you go manic. You need to use Template:CN tags instead of just removing material that you don't like, and templating the worker bees, in the hopes of improving your chances of winning at AfD. Unscintillating (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think we can agree (one can hope that we are able to agree about something), that the section "Stores and Services", and the last sentence of the lede that only lists tenants can be removed as per WP:TENANTS. Do you agree? Unscintillating (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- For the remaining sourcing concerns that you have, do you agree to add Template:CN tags? Unscintillating (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)