The 80s chick (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Iluvteletubbies (talk | contribs) m clean-up! |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{WP Disney|class=Start}} |
{{WP Disney|class=Start}} |
||
== Computer animated == |
|||
This |
This film is probly a [[Computer animation|computer animated]] film, because [[The Walt Disney Company]] decided that they would no longer use [[traditional animation]]. {{unsigned|24.119.56.136}} |
||
:Unlikely. [[Disney]] said that way before they released [[Bambi II]], which was animated traditionally. {{unsigned|67.174.4.138}} |
:Unlikely. [[Disney]] said that way before they released [[Bambi II]], which was animated traditionally. {{unsigned|67.174.4.138}} |
||
== Credits question == |
== Credits question == |
||
The Wikipedia article credits [[Steve Bencich]] and [[Ron J. Friedman]] as writers on this film, but [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465940/fullcredits#writers IMDb] doesn't. Is IMDb wrong, or are we? If it's IMDb, could we have a citation for Bencich and Friedman's work on this film? Thanks. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 21:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC) |
The Wikipedia article credits [[Steve Bencich]] and [[Ron J. Friedman]] as writers on this film, but [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465940/fullcredits#writers IMDb] doesn't. Is IMDb wrong, or are we? If it's IMDb, could we have a citation for Bencich and Friedman's work on this film? Thanks. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 21:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
IMDb isn't always right,as I have found out in the recent years.But it might be best to leave it out for the time being. [[User:JakeTheBlake|JakeTheBlake]] 22:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC) |
IMDb isn't always right,as I have found out in the recent years.But it might be best to leave it out for the time being. [[User:JakeTheBlake|JakeTheBlake]] 22:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Fair use rationale for Image:Cinderella III cover.JPG== |
== Fair use rationale for Image:Cinderella III cover.JPG == |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]] |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]] |
||
'''[[:Image:Cinderella III cover.JPG]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]]. |
'''[[:Image:Cinderella III cover.JPG]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]]. |
||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 15:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 15:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Goofs== |
== Goofs == |
||
I've removed the lengthy list of Goofs in accordance with wiki policy. (See [[WP:TRIV]]) I've saved them here in case anyone wants to submit them to IMDB, which ''does'' allow goof listings. [[User:The 80s chick|Annie D]] 00:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
I've removed the lengthy list of Goofs in accordance with wiki policy. (See [[WP:TRIV]]) I've saved them here in case anyone wants to submit them to IMDB, which ''does'' allow goof listings. [[User:The 80s chick|Annie D]] 00:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
<blockquote> |
<blockquote> |
Revision as of 19:23, 5 September 2008
Film Start‑class | |||||||
|
Animation: American Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Disney Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Computer animated
This film is probly a computer animated film, because The Walt Disney Company decided that they would no longer use traditional animation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.56.136 (talk • contribs)
- Unlikely. Disney said that way before they released Bambi II, which was animated traditionally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.4.138 (talk • contribs)
Credits question
The Wikipedia article credits Steve Bencich and Ron J. Friedman as writers on this film, but IMDb doesn't. Is IMDb wrong, or are we? If it's IMDb, could we have a citation for Bencich and Friedman's work on this film? Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
IMDb isn't always right,as I have found out in the recent years.But it might be best to leave it out for the time being. JakeTheBlake 22:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Cinderella III cover.JPG
Image:Cinderella III cover.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Goofs
I've removed the lengthy list of Goofs in accordance with wiki policy. (See WP:TRIV) I've saved them here in case anyone wants to submit them to IMDB, which does allow goof listings. Annie D 00:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- The magic wand brings out green (instead of white) magic dust when used by Lady Tremaine or Drizella (but not when it is used by the not-so-wicked and sympathetic Anastasia), though this could be a visual representation of "dark magic".
- During "A Perfectly Perfect Year" Drizella's apron disappeared while singing "...or even tea." And both Drizella and Anastasia's aprons disappear after they get the laundry off themselves.
- After Anastasia gets thrown out of the house, she stands up to see Cinderella and the Prince riding by on horses and she walks forward. During this her apron disappears and reappears between several shots.
- After Anastasia gets the wand Drizella is seen cutting tree pieces with an axe which gets stuck. After pulling out the handle the axe's head is pointing opposite of the house. But in the wand fight the axe's head is turned 90 degrees pointing either the chair's back or the Fairy Godmother and Anastasia.
- While Lady Tremaine was reversing time, the brief glimpse of the wedding shows the Prince wearing a white groom outfit which is different from the wedding from the first movie where he's wearing a yellow and red outfit.
- Jaq and Gus get the key at the wrong time compared to the first. In the first movie, Jaq and Gus get the key AFTER the Grand Duke comes. But after time reverses, the Grand Duke comes right after the mice are on their way to the stairs.
- During the reversal of time at the scene, where Cinderella is holding the slipper her hair is in a bow when it's suppose to be loose.
- When Anastasia was trying on the slipper, it barely fits on her big toe, but in the original it fit over all of her toes.
- When the slipper is falling it is about to be broken with the heel in the front. But in the crash the heel and the front of the slipper have switched places.
- When Tremaine breaks Cinderella's glass slipper the front and the heel do not get broken or cracked. But when Jaq presents the put-back-together slipper to the prince we can see cracks on them. And when the prince puts the slipper down to go find Cinderella the heel does not appear broken at all.
- While Cinderella is singing she connects the two halves of the slipper's heart together. But the heart appears to be too close over the slipper's edge.
- On the back of the DVD case, it shows Cinderella with Drizella and Tremaine when Tremaine was turning back time, although in the movie Cinderella was celebrating her anniversary in the forest.
- In the first movie, the king saw Cinderella before he got out, and obviously the Grand Duke, but neither, even when they're not under magic, don't recognize that Anastasia is not Cinderella. What makes the least sense is that the king even made a face at Anastasia at the ball.
- After Anastasia gets done chasing the ring down after it bounces around the room, she puts it on her left hand. Later in the same scene, Anastasia is seen walking admiring the ring, which is now on her right hand.
- After Anastasia is seen admiring the ring, the ring is no longer on her hand throughout the rest of the movie
- When Drizella is tampering with the wand in order to make herself beautiful (a prettier hair style, bracelets containing jewelry, a rainbow dress with jewelry, and a gigantic crown), she was able to use it without saying Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo. When Cinderella's evil stepmother makes Cinderella disappear into a pumpkin, she didn't need to say Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo either.
- When Jaq and Gus take the wand from the dresser, the tip of the wand is pointing forward. When they run out through the door it is pointing backwards and stays that way.
- When Cinderella is running away from the guards, there is a shot looking down the stairs that shows a cement structure sticking out of the top of the end baluster of the rails. Later when Cinderella slides down the stairs it is not there.
- While the shrunken Lucifer is attacking Gus, red pieces appear to be tearing off his shirt. And when the attack ends his and Jaq's shirts appear to be in perfect condition like nothing has happened.
- When Cinderella gets on the boat, the sky is dark and cloudy. When the Prince is seen on his horse riding into a wooden house/storage to reach the boat the horse's point-of-view sees the sun shining inside the room. In the next shot when the prince is flying out the balcony door, the sky is dark and cloudy again, with no sun being seen only until he reaches Cinderella.
- In the sequence where Cinderella is back at the castle and explaining to the King and Duke what Lady Tremaine did, her hair changes from being loose, to tied up in a bow, and back to being loose.
- In the first film, Cinderella wore a black choker with her wedding dress. In this film, the brief flashback at the beginning to the wedding the choker is still there, but for the rest of the film, it is absent.
- Cinderella's wedding dress has been slightly altered, the skirt in the original was a pale grey, but white in this movie, her hair was in a low bun (also kept while wearing the wedding dress) but when in her rags during the pumpkin sequence her hair has changed to a top bun like her blue/grey ballgown.
- In the scene where Tremaine and Drizella are turned back into human, there is a cut on both aprons that they are wearing, but when Drizella gets "frightened" by the broom, the cut on her apron disappears.
- In the first movie, the king is the one who sent out the order to find the Cinderella by having every girl in the kingdom try on the slipper.