Echo1Charlie (talk | contribs) |
Echo1Charlie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
{{ping|Satrar}} Hai, Good day. Let's come to the point, what was your rationale in removing this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CAC/PAC_JF-17_Thunder&diff=0&oldid=1046132979] cited content? —[[User:Echo1Charlie|Echo1Charlie]] ([[User talk:Echo1Charlie|talk]]) 05:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC) |
{{ping|Satrar}} Hai, Good day. Let's come to the point, what was your rationale in removing this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CAC/PAC_JF-17_Thunder&diff=0&oldid=1046132979] cited content? —[[User:Echo1Charlie|Echo1Charlie]] ([[User talk:Echo1Charlie|talk]]) 05:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
<br> |
|||
{{ping|Satrar}} What is your objection in adding that content with inline citation? Please respond here or else your reluctance to respond here would be treated as [[WP:SILENCE]] and the said content would be re-added, so I request you to write your objections regarding the said change here. Thank you —[[User:Echo1Charlie|Echo1Charlie]] ([[User talk:Echo1Charlie|talk]]) 05:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:37, 24 September 2021
CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A GA reassessment needed?
Today I've checked three cited links, and I found that in all the editor did some form or other form of manipulation, including misquoting the source, providing technical details widely different from the cited source etc. There maybe many more, either this article need a reassessment (I don't favour this option) or someone should step in and correct it. Thank you - --FoxtAl (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
In this article it is stated that jf17 reportedly missed the intended targets in 2019 airstrikes against india it is completely wrong and misquoted, the fact is that Pakistani authorities illustrated through presentation and satellite images that they intentionally missed the targets just to give the message that we are capable but we don't want escalation in the situation. Their targets were just in 2 meters of indian military installations and ammunition depots which were successfully hit by Pakistan air force jf17 thunders to show capability but not to escalate DoctorKhan304 (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
@Satrar: Hai, Good day. Let's come to the point, what was your rationale in removing this [1] cited content? —Echo1Charlie (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
@Satrar: What is your objection in adding that content with inline citation? Please respond here or else your reluctance to respond here would be treated as WP:SILENCE and the said content would be re-added, so I request you to write your objections regarding the said change here. Thank you —Echo1Charlie (talk) 05:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)