GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I'll take a look. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Fox classified the patients at Brislington House..- would prefer a different verb to "classified" - maybe "sorted"?- I think the key point is that he thought the different classes (which were very narrowly defined) should be treated differently - hence the different blocks. I've changed classified to divided but I think it needs to be stronger than sorted as this was a key component of the way the place worked, and even the design of the building.— Rod talk 20:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
WRT comprehensiveness, the segment about Perceval and the book is interesting. If there is anything more specific to Brislington House in the book it'd be good to add - any more of his reflections etc.
Ditto the one line on Frank Miles - a bit tantalisingly chopped-off - any extra info would be good.- I did have a bit more ie " He was cared for by his brother, the clergyman Charles Oswald Miles, but died in 1891 of what was diagnosed as 'general paralysis of the insane', often a term for neurosyphilis, exhaustion and pneumonia." but this was removed at DYK review as I could find any sources to support it.— Rod talk 20:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Otherwise, this one's pretty tight and on track for GA. Nice read. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:23, 26 November 2013 (UTC)