Content deleted Content added
Jimmuldrow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jimmuldrow (talk | contribs) You missed a few spots (presuming you read the Court opinions) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Well, I can dig up some more comments from the opinion of the Court if you'd like. Would that help?[[User:Jimmuldrow|Jimmuldrow]] 06:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
Well, I can dig up some more comments from the opinion of the Court if you'd like. Would that help?[[User:Jimmuldrow|Jimmuldrow]] 06:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
References with quotes from relevant Court opinions were added to show that what's in the article is based on Court opinions, not the opinion of Wikipedians. You missed a few spots.[[User:Jimmuldrow|Jimmuldrow]] 16:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:50, 10 February 2007
U.S. Supreme Court cases Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
There's some material in this article that seems irrelevant, other material that seems incorrect, and yet other material that is plainly the product of original research. Do others believe the article needs a fairly comprehensive rewriting? Hydriotaphia 02:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, I can dig up some more comments from the opinion of the Court if you'd like. Would that help?Jimmuldrow 06:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
References with quotes from relevant Court opinions were added to show that what's in the article is based on Court opinions, not the opinion of Wikipedians. You missed a few spots.Jimmuldrow 16:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)