Fourthords (talk | contribs) →sources: + source; |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WPBiography |
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=B|priority=Low|nested=yes|musician-work-group=yes|filmbio-work-group=yes|listas=Burnham, Bo}} |
||
{{Comedy|nested = yes|class = B|importance = Low}} |
{{Comedy|nested = yes|class = B|importance = Low}} |
||
{{Project Massachusetts|nested = yes|class = B|importance = Low}} |
{{Project Massachusetts|nested = yes|class = B|importance = Low}} |
||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
== bo bunrham help == |
== bo bunrham help == |
Revision as of 04:31, 11 March 2009
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
bo bunrham help
is there away we can redirect bo burnham to Bo Burnham? (caps) googling Bo Burnham shows wiki coming up at fourth hit, but non-caps pushes the site back to the fourth page.
i hope im making sense here lol..
no caps = http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bo+burnham&btnG=Google+Search
caps = http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Bo+Burnham&btnG=Search —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikifan12345 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 25 July 2008
not really
A lowercase search of bo burnham connects directly to the uppercase Bo Burnham. If it didn't then one could create a page there and redirect. It needs to be spelled differently to make a redirect page. You could make one the way you misspelled it, "bo bunrham" but that really wouldn't help much. MBCF (talk) 04:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- i kind of figured but id thought it was worth a shot. is it possible to make wiki come up on the first google hit for "Bo Burnham"? anything we as editors can do? Wikifan12345 (talk) 06:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- There are ways to make the page rank higher but you have to be careful because google ranking is smart. It knows when it is being tricked and then sends the rank down.
- The easiest thing to do is to make links using "Bo Bunrham" as the link to well visited sites about BB. That can be done in the "external links" and by adding references to everything. The more times you say "Bo Burnham" in sentences that make sense as well as links using that name will do it.
- The other thing to do is wait. It takes time. The longer the page exists the higher the rank. MBCF (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Just googled "Bo Burnham" in quotes and ranked number 6 and it was google visited on July 12 (look at the cached page). Adding a section title "Exteranl Links" and listing all good Bo sites would kick it up a notch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MBCF (talk • contribs) 12:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- gotchya. i tried googling bo burnham (without caps) and it ranked #6, like u said. im satisfied with that. : ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikifan12345 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Apatow
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/YouTube-Celeb-Joins-Team-Apatow-10320.html - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
20 Million Views
It says 20 million views on YT, yet on Tube it's only 2million+?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=LZoO8LyizLA&feature=channel
Changed to 2.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.14.103 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 24 November 2008
more info about apatow?
when i started this article i didnt think it would get this popular. : )
anyways, i was just wondering if we could start adding more info about bo burnham's alleged-collaboration with film director/producer judd apatow? been googling but cant seem to find anything noteworthy.
thanks!
Wikifan12345 (talk) 07:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
reconstitution
I greatly expanded and cleaned up this article. Every iota of information is 100% cited to reliable sources, and I executed the manual of style for articular consistency's sake. I don't think I removed any information that was originally present, but if so, make sure it's verifiable before replacing it. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
View counts
It says in this article that "Burnham's videos have received over 10 million hits" This information is quite old and Bo's videos have now received around 20-30 million views. Can anyone fix this and find a verifiable reference on his number of internet hits.
Thanks! (also, awesome re-doing of the article!) Catscan32 (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Collecting the information ourselves is original research and synthesis, and we can't do that. The 10m number comes from The Boston Globe which, as you say, is just shy of a year old. The numbers are invariably higher, but without a reliable source we can cite, our options are either (a) leave the 10m number in (possibly noting "as of"), or (b) remove it. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 03:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand. Why don't we just refer to Burnham's profile on youtube.com ?! He actually has more than 20 mio views on his videos by now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.230.60.192 (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- I discussed it at the original research noticeboard, and based on the input there, I've updated the count. The precise number at the very moment I looked was 32,648,901; I truncated that to "over 32.6 milion" for prose's sake. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 06:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- updated for March 2009 — pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
sources
- Mintzer, Rebekah (2009-02-26). "Bo Burnham Proves Teenagers Can Be Funny". The Spectator. Clinton, New York, United States: Hamilton College. Retrieved 2009-02-28.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|curly=
ignored (help) — pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC) - Greaney, T.J. (2009-03-04). "In-your-face comedy". Columbia Daily Tribune. Columbia, Missouri, United States: Henry J. Waters III. Retrieved 2009-03-05.
YouTube phenom Bo Burnham prompts protests at Westminster.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|curly=
ignored (help) — pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC) - Teen Vogue. United States: Gina Sanders. 2009. p. 91.
{{cite magazine}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|laydate=
,|laysummary=
,|day=
,|laysource=
, and|coauthors=
(help); Missing or empty|title=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)