Bangladesh at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games is within the scope of WikiProject Multi-sport events. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Multi-sport eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Multi-sport eventsTemplate:WikiProject Multi-sport eventsMulti-sport events articles
Other : Articles on multi-sport events, less the Olympic and Paralympic Games, need to be tagged on their talk pages with {{WikiProject Multi-sport events}}.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
References checked. No problem found except Ref. 6 with a little signal problem.
Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
Sources are pretty well and fine
Pass
(c) (original research)
No original research
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
I'd have from my side liked to see a bit more content.
Neutral
(b) (focused)
It is not out of topic or irrelevant.
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
No bias found; sources given for questionable sentences.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
No edit wars; major editors are Vibhijain and Srirarkashyap
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
Very few images; I'm not satisfied.
Fail
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
No notes.
Fail
Result
Result
On a more close look I see that there was a recent copyright problem. Article is also going through a major copyedit at the moment. Sorry not a GA, though, but feel free to renominate after problems have been cleared.
Fail
Going through a copyedit at the moment; nominate later. Dipankan(Have a chat?) 17:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
No discussion here.
Additional Notes
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
GA?
Copyvio issues aside (as signaled on my talk page by another editor), the writing in this article is in no way up to GA standards. I've already made one copyedit and I'll make a few more to indicate what I'm talking about. IMO, the GA designation should be yanked until that (and maybe other issues) is resolved. Drmies (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your reason is completely unclear. I thought the possibly copyvio was handled via attribution in an edit summary, so please explain. Also, you really need to address the problems I signaled: how is it you passed an article with so many obvious writing problems? Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Going through a copyedit at the moment; nominate later. Dipankan(Have a chat?) 05:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]