2406:7400:90:e1aa:b186:9e26:b6bf:fa70 (talk) |
Newslinger (talk | contribs) →Clarification: Tag disrupted discussion and strike block evasion (WP:BE, WP:SOCKSTRIKE, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Souniel Yadav) |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} |
{{talk header}} |
||
{{ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ipa|long}} |
||
{{Article history |
{{Article history |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| action2oldid = 598595548 |
| action2oldid = 598595548 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Hinduism |
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Religion |
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Mid|Interfaith=yes|InterfaithImp=}} |
||
{{WikiProject Discrimination |
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=mid}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
{{ref-talk}} |
{{ref-talk}} |
||
== adding to lead section == |
|||
I've tried adding to the lead section a bit to give a better overview. I also slightly changed some of the wording with regards to muslims considering all hindus as kafirs. |
|||
I think this edit remains neutral, but I'd still like someone to take a look over it to confirm? [[User:Sawerchessread|homo momo]] ([[User talk:Sawerchessread|talk]]) 19:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:also I think the New Zealand section was misplaced such that american incidents were layered below. Ive moved it to be correct, I think? (i.e. all incidents are United States are in the United States?) [[User:Sawerchessread|homo momo]] ([[User talk:Sawerchessread|talk]]) 19:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::I've made a partial revert to the lead. I don't see where sources support a broad distinction between Muslim-majority countries and the "West". [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 07:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2024 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2024 == |
||
{{edit semi-protected|Anti-Hindu sentiment|answered= |
{{edit semi-protected|Anti-Hindu sentiment|answered=yes}} |
||
To the India subsection of the Asia section, please add, "[[M._K._Stalin]], the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister issued an oral order to the police department not to permit any kind of poojas, archanas, feeding of the poor, live telecast of the consecration of the idol of Lord Raam at Ayodhya, bhajans and processions of Lord Ram in any temple of Tamil Nadu irrespective of whether it is a private temple or a temple controlled by the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department but a petition was moved in the Supreme Court of India and the oral order was quashed paving the way for all of those on 22nd January, 2024. The petition had stated that “such arbitrary exercise of power by the State government (through police officers) per se, violates fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution”.<ref name="Raam2024">{{cite web | last=Rajagopal | first=Krishnadas | title=Ram temple consecration: Police, authorities not bound to act on ‘oral orders’ to ban live telecast, programmes, says SC order | website=The Hindu | date=2024-01-22 | url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ram-temple-consecration-plea-in-sc-challenges-tn-govts-oral-order-against-live-telecast-in-state/article67764424.ece | access-date=2024-01-22}}</ref> [[Special:Contributions/49.37.169.10|49.37.169.10]] ([[User talk:49.37.169.10|talk]]) 17:36, 22 January 2024 (UTCUTC) |
To the India subsection of the Asia section, please add, "[[M._K._Stalin]], the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister issued an oral order to the police department not to permit any kind of poojas, archanas, feeding of the poor, live telecast of the consecration of the idol of Lord Raam at Ayodhya, bhajans and processions of Lord Ram in any temple of Tamil Nadu irrespective of whether it is a private temple or a temple controlled by the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department but a petition was moved in the Supreme Court of India and the oral order was quashed paving the way for all of those on 22nd January, 2024. The petition had stated that “such arbitrary exercise of power by the State government (through police officers) per se, violates fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution”.<ref name="Raam2024">{{cite web | last=Rajagopal | first=Krishnadas | title=Ram temple consecration: Police, authorities not bound to act on ‘oral orders’ to ban live telecast, programmes, says SC order | website=The Hindu | date=2024-01-22 | url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ram-temple-consecration-plea-in-sc-challenges-tn-govts-oral-order-against-live-telecast-in-state/article67764424.ece | access-date=2024-01-22}}</ref> [[Special:Contributions/49.37.169.10|49.37.169.10]] ([[User talk:49.37.169.10|talk]]) 17:36, 22 January 2024 (UTCUTC) |
||
:Duplicate request. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 18:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
:Duplicate request. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 18:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
::This is not a duplicate request - it is completely different from what is requested in the next section. Please add that sentence.-[[Special:Contributions/2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70]] ([[User talk:2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|talk]]) 18:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
::This is not a duplicate request - it is completely different from what is requested in the next section. Please add that sentence.-[[Special:Contributions/2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70]] ([[User talk:2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|talk]]) 18:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::{{Done}}'''.''' ''⸗ [[User:Antrotherkus|Antrotherkus]] <sup>❲ [[User talk:Antrotherkus|Talk to me!]] ❳</sup> ⸗'' 00:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{rlt}} |
{{rlt}} |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2024 (2) == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2024 (2) == |
||
{{ |
{{Edit semi-protected|Anti-Hindu sentiment|answered=yes}} |
||
Please add this to the India subsection of the Asia section, "Speaking at a [[Sanātana Dharma|''Sanatana dharma'']] abolition conference, [[Udhayanidhi Stalin]] advocated for its "eradication" and said that it is against social justice and equality.<ref |
Please add this to the India subsection of the Asia section, "Speaking at a [[Sanātana Dharma|''Sanatana dharma'']] abolition conference, [[Udhayanidhi Stalin]] advocated for its "eradication" and said that it is against social justice and equality.<ref name="anti-Hinduism" /> |
||
The action was heavily condemned in Malaysia by groups of organizations that represents Sanathana Dharma including, Malaysia Hindu Sangam, United Malaysian Hindu Voice ([https://umhv.com.my/ UMHV]), National Malaysia Hindhudharma Maamandram, and other notable NGOs.<ref>{{cite news |last=Bureau |first=Indus Scrolls |date=6 September 2023 |title=Malaysia Hindu Sangam condemns Udayanidhi Stalin’s hatred against Sanatana Dharma, writes to the High Commission of India requesting Indian Government to act |pages=1 |work=Indus Scrolls |publisher=INDUSSCROLLS |publication-place=Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India |url=https://indusscrolls.com/malaysia-hindu-sangam-condemns-udayanidhi-for-anti-sanatan-remarks-papa-stalin-supports-son |access-date=27 November 2023}}</ref> which is copied from the Udayanidhi Stalin article. [[Special:Contributions/49.37.169.10|49.37.169.10]] ([[User talk:49.37.169.10|talk]]) 17:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
The action was heavily condemned in Malaysia by groups of organizations that represents Sanathana Dharma including, Malaysia Hindu Sangam, United Malaysian Hindu Voice ([https://umhv.com.my/ UMHV]), National Malaysia Hindhudharma Maamandram, and other notable NGOs.<ref>{{cite news |last=Bureau |first=Indus Scrolls |date=6 September 2023 |title=Malaysia Hindu Sangam condemns Udayanidhi Stalin’s hatred against Sanatana Dharma, writes to the High Commission of India requesting Indian Government to act |pages=1 |work=Indus Scrolls |publisher=INDUSSCROLLS |publication-place=Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India |url=https://indusscrolls.com/malaysia-hindu-sangam-condemns-udayanidhi-for-anti-sanatan-remarks-papa-stalin-supports-son |access-date=27 November 2023}}</ref> which is copied from the Udayanidhi Stalin article. [[Special:Contributions/49.37.169.10|49.37.169.10]] ([[User talk:49.37.169.10|talk]]) 17:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
:{{notdone}} Indus scrolls is an unreliable source. We have to see how reliable sources have described his statements as. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 18:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
:{{notdone}} Indus scrolls is an unreliable source. We have to see how reliable sources have described his statements as. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 18:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Then please add just this to the India subsection of the Asia section, "Speaking at a [[Sanātana Dharma|''Sanatana dharma'']] abolition conference, [[Udhayanidhi Stalin]] advocated for its "eradication" and said that it is against social justice and equality.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bureau |first=The Hindu |date=2023-09-02 |title=Sanatana is against social justice and has to be eradicated: Udhayanidhi |language=en-IN |work=The Hindu |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/sanatana-is-against-social-justice-and-has-to-be-eradicated-udhayanidhi/article67264565.ece |access-date=2023-09-02 |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> - [[Special:Contributions/2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70]] ([[User talk:2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|talk]]) 18:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
::Then please add just this to the India subsection of the Asia section, "Speaking at a [[Sanātana Dharma|''Sanatana dharma'']] abolition conference, [[Udhayanidhi Stalin]] advocated for its "eradication" and said that it is against social justice and equality.<ref name="anti-Hinduism">{{Cite news |last=Bureau |first=The Hindu |date=2023-09-02 |title=Sanatana is against social justice and has to be eradicated: Udhayanidhi |language=en-IN |work=The Hindu |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/sanatana-is-against-social-justice-and-has-to-be-eradicated-udhayanidhi/article67264565.ece |access-date=2023-09-02 |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> - [[Special:Contributions/2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70]] ([[User talk:2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70|talk]]) 18:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::{{notdone}} Please make your request in the talk page of the article where you wish to see this change. [[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 19:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::I am requesting someone to add the above sentence with the cited reference to this article itself, that is the, [[Anti-Hindu sentiment]] article, in the India subsection of the Asia section. Please do so. Please also answer the request in the previous section.-[[Special:Contributions/2406:7400:90:1E99:CA60:118F:4AE5:4FA0|2406:7400:90:1E99:CA60:118F:4AE5:4FA0]] ([[User talk:2406:7400:90:1E99:CA60:118F:4AE5:4FA0|talk]]) 14:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{ping|Vanamonde93|RegentsPark}} can you please add the above text or answer why it is unacceptable? - [[Special:Contributions/2406:7400:98:1CA3:5434:3134:7A32:C894|2406:7400:98:1CA3:5434:3134:7A32:C894]] ([[User talk:2406:7400:98:1CA3:5434:3134:7A32:C894|talk]]) 14:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::You have to show [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for supporting your claim that the person was promoting anti-Hindu sentiment. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 11:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{partly done|Partly done:}}<!-- Template:ESp --> I added the information from [[Wikipedia:THEHINDU|The Hindu]] as this is a consensus reliable source. The rest cannot be added as explained above. [[User:Jamedeus|Jamedeus]] ([[User talk:Jamedeus|talk]]) 01:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
|||
== Clarification == |
|||
{{disdis|Haani40|spi=Souniel Yadav}} |
|||
<s>{{re|Vanamonde93}} In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Hindu_sentiment&diff=prev&oldid=1219557892&title=Anti-Hindu_sentiment&diffonly=1 this] edit summary you seem to be accusing me. However, I want to clarify that I only corrected the link in the edit just before your edit (and the one before that was just to fix a typo). I am not the author of that sentence.-[[User:Haani40|Haani40]] ([[User talk:Haani40|talk]]) 19:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)</s> |
|||
:I didn't name you, did I? The content needs to be supported explicitly by a source. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 15:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:16, 2 May 2024
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reverts
El C, I edit Wikipedia occassionally. Please let me know what is wrong with the first paragraph you removed by this edit. The source used does say that.
Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2021
Please change X (no info) to "Several thousand supporters of Hefazat-e-Islam’s leader Mamunul Haque in Bangladesh attacked a Hindu village in March 2021, which resulted in the ransacking and looting of many houses and the vandalization of 70-80 houses."[1]
References
- ^ "Extremist Islamist group's supporters attack 70-80 Hindu houses in Bangladesh: Police". India Today. 20 March 2021.
Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2024
To the India subsection of the Asia section, please add, "M._K._Stalin, the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister issued an oral order to the police department not to permit any kind of poojas, archanas, feeding of the poor, live telecast of the consecration of the idol of Lord Raam at Ayodhya, bhajans and processions of Lord Ram in any temple of Tamil Nadu irrespective of whether it is a private temple or a temple controlled by the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department but a petition was moved in the Supreme Court of India and the oral order was quashed paving the way for all of those on 22nd January, 2024. The petition had stated that “such arbitrary exercise of power by the State government (through police officers) per se, violates fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution”.[1] 49.37.169.10 (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2024 (UTCUTC)
- Duplicate request. Capitals00 (talk) 18:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a duplicate request - it is completely different from what is requested in the next section. Please add that sentence.-2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70 (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Done. ⸗ Antrotherkus ❲ Talk to me! ❳ ⸗ 00:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a duplicate request - it is completely different from what is requested in the next section. Please add that sentence.-2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70 (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (2024-01-22). "Ram temple consecration: Police, authorities not bound to act on 'oral orders' to ban live telecast, programmes, says SC order". The Hindu. Retrieved 2024-01-22.
Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2024 (2)
Please add this to the India subsection of the Asia section, "Speaking at a Sanatana dharma abolition conference, Udhayanidhi Stalin advocated for its "eradication" and said that it is against social justice and equality.[1] The action was heavily condemned in Malaysia by groups of organizations that represents Sanathana Dharma including, Malaysia Hindu Sangam, United Malaysian Hindu Voice (UMHV), National Malaysia Hindhudharma Maamandram, and other notable NGOs.[2] which is copied from the Udayanidhi Stalin article. 49.37.169.10 (talk) 17:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done Indus scrolls is an unreliable source. We have to see how reliable sources have described his statements as. Capitals00 (talk) 18:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Then please add just this to the India subsection of the Asia section, "Speaking at a Sanatana dharma abolition conference, Udhayanidhi Stalin advocated for its "eradication" and said that it is against social justice and equality.[1] - 2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70 (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done Please make your request in the talk page of the article where you wish to see this change. RegentsPark (comment) 19:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am requesting someone to add the above sentence with the cited reference to this article itself, that is the, Anti-Hindu sentiment article, in the India subsection of the Asia section. Please do so. Please also answer the request in the previous section.-2406:7400:90:1E99:CA60:118F:4AE5:4FA0 (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93 and RegentsPark: can you please add the above text or answer why it is unacceptable? - 2406:7400:98:1CA3:5434:3134:7A32:C894 (talk) 14:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- You have to show reliable sources for supporting your claim that the person was promoting anti-Hindu sentiment. Capitals00 (talk) 11:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93 and RegentsPark: can you please add the above text or answer why it is unacceptable? - 2406:7400:98:1CA3:5434:3134:7A32:C894 (talk) 14:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Then please add just this to the India subsection of the Asia section, "Speaking at a Sanatana dharma abolition conference, Udhayanidhi Stalin advocated for its "eradication" and said that it is against social justice and equality.[1] - 2406:7400:90:E1AA:B186:9E26:B6BF:FA70 (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Partly done: I added the information from The Hindu as this is a consensus reliable source. The rest cannot be added as explained above. Jamedeus (talk) 01:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ a b Bureau, The Hindu (2023-09-02). "Sanatana is against social justice and has to be eradicated: Udhayanidhi". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2023-09-02.
- ^ Bureau, Indus Scrolls (6 September 2023). "Malaysia Hindu Sangam condemns Udayanidhi Stalin's hatred against Sanatana Dharma, writes to the High Commission of India requesting Indian Government to act". Indus Scrolls. Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India: INDUSSCROLLS. p. 1. Retrieved 27 November 2023.
Clarification
@Vanamonde93: In this edit summary you seem to be accusing me. However, I want to clarify that I only corrected the link in the edit just before your edit (and the one before that was just to fix a typo). I am not the author of that sentence.-Haani40 (talk) 19:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't name you, did I? The content needs to be supported explicitly by a source. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)