{{WPSweden|class=GA|importance=mid}} |
m A |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProjectBanners |
{{WikiProjectBanners |
||
|1={{WPBiography|living=yes|class= |
|1={{WPBiography|living=yes|class=A|importance=|sports-work-group=yes|old-peer-review=yes|A-Class=pass}} |
||
|2={{Wikiproject Golf|class= |
|2={{Wikiproject Golf|class=A|importance= Top}} |
||
|3={{WPSweden|class= |
|3={{WPSweden|class=A|importance=mid}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 14:28, 1 April 2008
![]() | Annika Sörenstam has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Sörenstam
If her name is Sörenstam (and it is) then don't spell it Sorenstam in the article.
The change in the categories from Sorenstam to Sörenstam was not an attempt at "deliberate missorting" but an attempt at consistency. This being the English version of Wikipedia, we ought to have some sort of agreement on use of ö or not in this article. Mudforce 22:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Not everyone knows how to create the ö character on their keyboard. It might be an honest mistake. Crunch 23:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Vijay
About Vijay's comments: it is tough to find out what he really said, and I didn't see his comments on TV. The media apparently twisted it around somewhat, and quoted him on some things, but left out other parts, which didn't lead to a complete quoting of what he really said. dave 01:24 19 May 2003 (UTC)
- Well done. Assuming those are from televised comments, or from newsprint and he was quoted correctly. Thanks. dave 19:54 19 May 2003 (UTC)
Some discussion on how to reference the fact that Sorenstam was born in Sweden has taken place recently (given the edits in the past few hours). I'd be interested in comments from others on my talk page on the subject. - Cafemusique 22:03 23 May 2003 (UTC)
I've swapped the redirect and the article, so the article is now titled with the correct spelling, and the accentless version is a redirect. --Brion 18:22 24 May 2003 (UTC)
Swedish atheists?
Someone added this article to the category Swedish Atheists. Is there a reference for this? Did you perhaps mean Swedish athletes? Without a reference, I propose deleting the link. Otherwise, add a reference. Crunch 17:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- This is so ridiculous it's not funny. Don't you understand we have better things to do? Not everyone belongs to the Church of George Bush and thank goodness most people on this planet don't have the idiotic ideas you have. Personal beliefs are PERSONAL and have no place in this Wiki. Whether you 'over there' grasp this or not. Leave the poor girl alone! And get on with your lives! And let her (and us) get on with ours! —Please sign your posts on talk pages. The preceding comment was added by 62.1.131.242 at 15:58, 5 August 2006.
- No reply, it's been removed. Crunch 19:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Point of View Flag
User:John Cho has flagged this article as having point of view issues but without any note on the discussion page as to what the point of view issues might be. Until the issues are addressed here, I have removed the POV flag. Crunch 02:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Photo in middle of results section
I think the addition of photos is generally a good idea, but I'm not sure the photo of Annika on the practice putting green at the 2006 British Open is helping, at least not where it's placed. It's in the middle of the LPGA wins section, which causes that section to shift off to the side. Can we find a better location for that photo? Or maybe we can do without it. Crunch 13:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
I've re-arranged the pictures. I think it looks better than before Mudforce 18:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Much better. Nice photos, too. Crunch 19:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Did you change this again? There is a photo now obscuring the Results in LPGA Majors sections. Maybe just reduce the size of the photos if you still want to have all of these in the article.Crunch 20:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I changed the picture layout when the references went to a 2 column structure. This should be better. Mudforce 20:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's better, at least you can see all the text, but still not right. Can you see how "Kraft Nabisco Championship" wraps in the top table? Plus, when we add 2008, we'll run into more problems. I really recommend not putting a photo in that section. It's distracting and the photo isn't very informative anyway. How useful is another photo of Annika on the practice putting green where all you can see if the top of her head? Crunch 22:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- At my default screen resolution it's not a problem but I can see your point. I've resized the photos and re-arranged them, losing the one mentioned above. Mudforce 08:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
GA tip
I have not done a formal review, but if you want to get GA, fix the ref formatting, it's highly inconsistent.Rlevse 18:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ref formating fixed. Thanks for the tip Mudforce 19:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
GA review
This article is very well written and well organized. The references look good (although as a minor point, some of the references could use a bit more information regarding who published them ... e.g. 'LET' isn't very descriptive, should those links go away. Where possible, try and include author information (who wrote the article) in the reference as well. But they are in a consistent format, so these issues are not being considered against GA status (should be fixed prior to FA, though).
I like the article's use of GFDL, amateur images. Some of them look very good. The use of the one copyrighted image at the top is fine, since it's a promotional photo (fair use).
Overall, the article is very good and very broad. Some additional details could be added in the future on personal life and off-the-course stuff. But overall, I think this meets the good article criteria. Cheers! Dr. Cash 17:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Merge Annika Sörenstam at the Colonial into this Article?
I'm proposing that Annika Sörenstam at the Colonial be merged into this article. The topic is already covered in this article and it seems neither necessary nor logical to have two pages. Please vote below by stating merge or no merge. We'll run this poll for at least 5 days in accordance with the Wikipedia policy. --Crunch 20:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge. For reasons stated above. --Crunch 20:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge. Agree with above comments. Main article now expands on the controversy as suggested in Peer Review so separate page is superfluous. Mudforce 21:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- The result was Merge Annika Sörenstam at the Colonial into this article. --Crunch 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Main image isn't fair use
Image:Sorenstam15.jpg has been tagged as not fair use - it is not unrepeatable. Anyone have a free image that can be uploaded? Not a dog 14:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- GFDL image added - Mudforce 18:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Know what would be nice? A free photo that clearly shows her face. All of the images of her that we have now are not terribly clear or obscured. --Edward Morgan Blake (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)