66.109.248.114 (talk) →Merge "discussion": quick fix |
→Merge "discussion": comment |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
*please merge them, and use [[WP:ANI]] to report the IP editor for [[WP:DISRUPT|disruption]], namely [[WP:EW|edit warring]] and continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors if they continue, pointing to the debate above to indicate the consensus reached. [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] <small>[[User talk:Hiding|T]] </small> 16:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
*please merge them, and use [[WP:ANI]] to report the IP editor for [[WP:DISRUPT|disruption]], namely [[WP:EW|edit warring]] and continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors if they continue, pointing to the debate above to indicate the consensus reached. [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] <small>[[User talk:Hiding|T]] </small> 16:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
::[[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|My intention]] was not that of edit warring; however, I feel that valid points were made, that were never addressed in the discussion. In addition, this page has been hastily merged in the past evidenced my a previous merge discussion that last less that 4 days prior to the merge. Consensus rests on dialogue, which I feel was not concluded. -[[Special:Contributions/66.109.248.114|66.109.248.114]] ([[User talk:66.109.248.114|talk]]) 20:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC). |
::[[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|My intention]] was not that of edit warring; however, I feel that valid points were made, that were never addressed in the discussion. In addition, this page has been hastily merged in the past evidenced my a previous merge discussion that last less that 4 days prior to the merge. Consensus rests on dialogue, which I feel was not concluded. -[[Special:Contributions/66.109.248.114|66.109.248.114]] ([[User talk:66.109.248.114|talk]]) 20:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC). |
||
:::The merge was open for one month, and a consensus was made. In my view, since you disagree with the consensus, you are being difficult about the matter. I've seen this happen plenty of times: a person disagrees with the majority, then makes a claim of "it's not concluded" just to prevent the consensus from happening. [[User:RobJ1981|RobJ1981]] ([[User talk:RobJ1981|talk]]) 14:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:48, 11 January 2008
Comics Redirect‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Ultimatestorm.jpg
Image:Ultimatestorm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Merge "discussion"
66.109.248.114 was the only person to disagree with the merge, and that was the second time it had to be merged. Concensus was reached. They should be merged. -Freak104 (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- please merge them, and use WP:ANI to report the IP editor for disruption, namely edit warring and continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors if they continue, pointing to the debate above to indicate the consensus reached. Hiding T 16:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- My intention was not that of edit warring; however, I feel that valid points were made, that were never addressed in the discussion. In addition, this page has been hastily merged in the past evidenced my a previous merge discussion that last less that 4 days prior to the merge. Consensus rests on dialogue, which I feel was not concluded. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC).
- The merge was open for one month, and a consensus was made. In my view, since you disagree with the consensus, you are being difficult about the matter. I've seen this happen plenty of times: a person disagrees with the majority, then makes a claim of "it's not concluded" just to prevent the consensus from happening. RobJ1981 (talk) 14:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- My intention was not that of edit warring; however, I feel that valid points were made, that were never addressed in the discussion. In addition, this page has been hastily merged in the past evidenced my a previous merge discussion that last less that 4 days prior to the merge. Consensus rests on dialogue, which I feel was not concluded. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC).