VanishedUser kfljdfjsg33k (talk | contribs) |
ClaudeReigns (talk | contribs) →Researching Notable Alumnae Section: challenge with due diligence. |
||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
::::::::Per the policy of [[wp:v]], the '''burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material'''.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 08:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
::::::::Per the policy of [[wp:v]], the '''burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material'''.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 08:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::::::::You've already said that above, and I've pointed out another part of the same policy which you are rather pointedly not following. You can't pick and choose which parts of the policy you like. It's [[WP:DISRUPT|disruptive]]. Stop. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''˜[[User:Danjel|danjel]]''' [ [[User_talk:Danjel|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]] ]</span> 09:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
:::::::::You've already said that above, and I've pointed out another part of the same policy which you are rather pointedly not following. You can't pick and choose which parts of the policy you like. It's [[WP:DISRUPT|disruptive]]. Stop. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''˜[[User:Danjel|danjel]]''' [ [[User_talk:Danjel|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]] ]</span> 09:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
==Researching Notable Alumnae Section== |
|||
*Elizabeth Alexander |
|||
::No immediately verifiable source. As I cannot access "Sydney Morning herald" article cited in her WP bio, I could not in good conscience cite it here. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Thea Astley |
|||
::Source at her WP bio is deadlinked, and I have tagged it. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Fran Bailey |
|||
::Primary sourcing states "All Hallows College" which is actually in Dublin. Probably ''true'' but not verifiable from my attempt. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Sarah Crane |
|||
::WP bio statement is also unsourced. I gave up after about 4 pages of google entries and tagged at that article. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Ellen Fanning |
|||
::Same as Sarah Crane. No source, googling didn't help. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Diane Fingleton |
|||
::Sourced per University of Queensland. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Teresa Gambaro |
|||
::Sourced per Liberal Party of Australia. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Miranda Kerr |
|||
::Sourced per WP bio's citation, verified. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Elissia Canham |
|||
::Unsourced, googling did not verify. Is she even notable? [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Tracey Wickham |
|||
::Sourced per ''Daily Telegraph''. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Zelle Hodge |
|||
::Googled, no verifiable source. Tagged WP bio. Notable? [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Ernestine Hill |
|||
::Googled, no verifiable source. Not living, however, so BLP does not apply. Tagged WP bio. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Verity Barton |
|||
::Verified and sourced per WP bio. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
These listings, where unsourced, do not conform to [[WP:BLP]] with the exception of Ernestine Hill, deceased. This includes Elizabeth Alexander, Thea Astley, Sarah Crane, Ellen Fanning, Elissia Canham and Zelle Hodge. 24 hours given to correct. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:30, 15 January 2013
Australia: Queensland / Education B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Schools B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Women's History B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Possible copyright violation
An editor has inserted slabs of text taken straight from the school website. This is a possible violation of copyright and is not permitted - please see Wikipedia:Copyrights. This article will now need to go to be cleaned up - inconveniencing other editors. It is permissable, indeed encouraged, to source facts, but wholesale copying from websites is not allowed and must not be repeated. If you have any queries please leave them here and I will collect them. BlueValour 16:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Merger (September 2007)
I am going to propose a merger of the two daughter articles of this page into this page, the two articles are;
Please leave comments below:
- Merge Both are non-notable Aquinas Cruft, which deserve a mention in the main article not as an article in itself. Twenty Years 12:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Merge As above. However, I also feel that a significant amount of material from both articles will need to be removed in order to merge them. I particularly don't feel comfortable amount the photos of minors playing soccer (and there are WAY too many photos in this article already). Loopla 14:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- RESULT WAS MERGE - two subarticles deleted Twenty Years 15:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Aus B class assessment
After reading the article its still a b-class article, I removed the single sentence about the principal in the lead. I see some content concerns in the article;
- Lead
- peacock wording/advertising the school follows in the tradition of the
- school mottos should be describe within the article,
- the WP:LEAD is meant to be a summary of the article body
- Article body
- Alumni list, are all of these really notable, consider whether they meet the criteria for an individual article
- Co-curriculum,list for what purpose
- traditions, most dont appear to encyclopedic, but rather a student guide. Gnangarra 02:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Removed alumni
I have removed the following people from the list of alumni in the main article, as they are unreferenced and redlinked. If anyone finds a reliable ref for any of the below, proving their notability (some appear to be non-notable) and that they attended the school, please include them in the article:
- Academia, science and education
- Theresa Creagh, OAM - education
- Annemarie Devereux, author and law expert
- Zelle Hodge (aka Zelle Campbell), Queensland President, Australian Medical Association, 2006
- Leah Horwitz, AOM - music
- Gabrielle Kelly, engineer, NASA Space Shuttle Project
- Carmel Montomgomery, haemotologist
- Kateena O'Gorman, Rhodes Scholar
- Gabrielle Persley, ecology and agricultural biotechnology
- Eleanor Townsley, author, sociologist and feminist (based in the USA)
- Marelyn Wintour-Couglan, physiologist
- Business, industry and commerce
- Betty Byrne Ford, motor industry
- Patrice Derrington, architecture and engineering
- Catherine Donovan, public relations
- Margaret MacDonald, civil engineering
- Elizabeth Musgrave, architecture
- Karen O'Rourke, workplace health and safety
- Sarina Russo, business identity
- Rhonda White, pharmacy industry
- Media, arts and entertainment
- Leisha Bonfield, pioneering radio announcer and broadcaster
- Nina Clarke, children's television presenter
- Judy Conelli, vocalist
- Sarah Crane, opera
- Monica Curro, musician
- Sarah Curro, musician
- Emily Delitt, violinist, Australian Chamber Orchestra
- Gabrielle di Labio, actor
- Silvana Gardner, visual artist
- Margaret Mercia Baker Genovesi, opera
- Clare Hansson, Jazz musician
- Mary Rose MacColl, author
- Sister Jean-Marie Mahoney, Roman Catholic nun, historian and author
- Larissa McGown, dancer and choreographer
- Paula Rosenstengel, artist
- Maruerite Sopinksi, musician
- Lisa Jane Stockwell, theatre
- Robin Watford, artist
- Public administration, law and politics
- Pamela O'Neill, Australia's first Sex Discrimination Commissioner
- Religion
- Sister Kath Burke, SM Congregation Leader and Australian Institute Leader
- Sister Denise Coghlan, Jesuit Refugee Services, Cambodia
- Sister Catherine Courtney, SM Congregation Leader
- Mother Mary Elizabeth Duncombe, SM Congregation Leader
- Sister Regis Mary Dunne, Australian bioethicist
- Sister Sandra Lupi, SM Congregation Leader
- Sister Jean-Marie Mahoney, Roman Catholic nun, historian and author
- Mother Marcella McCormick, SM Congregation Leader
- Sister Mary Claver McDermott, instructor of foreign languages
- Sport
- Elyssia Canham, Australian soccer player (Olympic squad, the Matildas, Athens)
- Clare Cooke, Australian swimmer (Empire Games 1961)
- Marguerite Houston, Australian rowing team (Olympics and Commonwealth Games)
- Marianna Lee, Australian table tennis
- Julie Majer, Australian swimmer (short course)
- Debbie Pickersgill, Australian athlete (field)
- Emily Rosemond, Australian Winter Olympian (speed skating)
- Jodie Stuhmcke, Australian waterpolo (Olympics)
- Rachel Wilkes, Australian diver
Loopla (talk) 10:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Removal of House System section
Epeefleche removed the house system section, because, it is asserted in his edit summary, a tag asking for citations had been up for a while. I get the impression that this is a driveby, because Special:Contributions/Epeefleche shows this activity occuring quickly over the last few minutes. Therefore, I've reverted it while we ascertain what exactly is the problem here.
The information, per WP:CHALLENGE, is not likely to be challenged. But I suppose it is here. But which bit? All of it? ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 08:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
I have a source ([1]), found in just under a minute of googling (good job, Epeefleche), but am I entering it into every single sentence? ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 08:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- There is much in this article that is unsourced. And which has been tagged (and thus challenged) since 2010. Deletion of unsourced material is a challenge to it as well.It fails to meet wp:v. If it is not sourced, it is subject to removal. The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a reliable source that directly supports the material. I'm happy to wait a little while if anyone wants to provide RS sourcing. It fails wp:v.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Requesting citations for the colour of the school's uniform seems indeed unnecessary drive-by tagging. There is much text in this article where encyclopedic relevance may well be questioned, but requesting citations for uncontroversial elements seems rather petty. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- This is, unfortunately, a pattern of behaviour for Epeefleche:
- etc. They're outside my area of expertise, but I suspect that a source could be found for those articles too in the less than 30 seconds it took for me to find a source for this one. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 10:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Per the policy of wp:v, the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. The material in question was challenged and tagged well over two years ago. It has now been challenged yet again. Well over two years have elapsed, without wp:v being complied with. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. All the material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, must be verifiable. All material whose verifiability has been challenged must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.--Epeefleche (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- The question is: are you challenging it because you genuinely believe that there is a question as to whether it is true or not? ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 11:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- That isn't the question. But the answer to it is yes. The question is whether the material is uncited, tagged for over two years by at least two different editors, constitutes original research, and has not been shown to be verifiable by the person who has the burden of demonstrating it to be such. Even if something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The question, as made clear by wp:v, is whether this uncited 2-year-challenged material has been made verifiable by the addition of an inline ref. The answer, as of now, is no. --Epeefleche (talk) 11:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is the question. It seems to me that if you were prepared to expend the tiniest amount of effort required to find the sources, based on a belief that what you've "challenged" may well be true, then the removal of content wouldn't be necessary. WP:CHALLENGE states that, in relation to material that is unsourced "it is better to try to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it" (emph. added). What you're doing is disruptive. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 11:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Per the policy of wp:v, the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- You've already said that above, and I've pointed out another part of the same policy which you are rather pointedly not following. You can't pick and choose which parts of the policy you like. It's disruptive. Stop. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 09:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Per the policy of wp:v, the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is the question. It seems to me that if you were prepared to expend the tiniest amount of effort required to find the sources, based on a belief that what you've "challenged" may well be true, then the removal of content wouldn't be necessary. WP:CHALLENGE states that, in relation to material that is unsourced "it is better to try to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it" (emph. added). What you're doing is disruptive. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 11:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- That isn't the question. But the answer to it is yes. The question is whether the material is uncited, tagged for over two years by at least two different editors, constitutes original research, and has not been shown to be verifiable by the person who has the burden of demonstrating it to be such. Even if something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The question, as made clear by wp:v, is whether this uncited 2-year-challenged material has been made verifiable by the addition of an inline ref. The answer, as of now, is no. --Epeefleche (talk) 11:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- The question is: are you challenging it because you genuinely believe that there is a question as to whether it is true or not? ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 11:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Per the policy of wp:v, the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. The material in question was challenged and tagged well over two years ago. It has now been challenged yet again. Well over two years have elapsed, without wp:v being complied with. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. All the material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, must be verifiable. All material whose verifiability has been challenged must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.--Epeefleche (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Requesting citations for the colour of the school's uniform seems indeed unnecessary drive-by tagging. There is much text in this article where encyclopedic relevance may well be questioned, but requesting citations for uncontroversial elements seems rather petty. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Researching Notable Alumnae Section
- Elizabeth Alexander
- No immediately verifiable source. As I cannot access "Sydney Morning herald" article cited in her WP bio, I could not in good conscience cite it here. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thea Astley
- Source at her WP bio is deadlinked, and I have tagged it. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Fran Bailey
- Primary sourcing states "All Hallows College" which is actually in Dublin. Probably true but not verifiable from my attempt. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sarah Crane
- WP bio statement is also unsourced. I gave up after about 4 pages of google entries and tagged at that article. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ellen Fanning
- Same as Sarah Crane. No source, googling didn't help. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Diane Fingleton
- Sourced per University of Queensland. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Teresa Gambaro
- Sourced per Liberal Party of Australia. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Miranda Kerr
- Sourced per WP bio's citation, verified. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Elissia Canham
- Unsourced, googling did not verify. Is she even notable? ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Tracey Wickham
- Sourced per Daily Telegraph. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Zelle Hodge
- Googled, no verifiable source. Tagged WP bio. Notable? ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ernestine Hill
- Googled, no verifiable source. Not living, however, so BLP does not apply. Tagged WP bio. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Verity Barton
- Verified and sourced per WP bio. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
These listings, where unsourced, do not conform to WP:BLP with the exception of Ernestine Hill, deceased. This includes Elizabeth Alexander, Thea Astley, Sarah Crane, Ellen Fanning, Elissia Canham and Zelle Hodge. 24 hours given to correct. ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)