Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) Why rescue when it |
Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) Just not notable |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Just wrong== |
==Just wrong== |
||
We can't even monkey-copy the datasheets correctly. This important and notable transistor doesn't even have its breakdown voltage listed correctly, and using it at 100 MHz is a hallucination by someone who hasn't read Ft = 200 MHz. I'm so glad all these parts list entries have been rescued, because otherwise someone might be mislead on the capabilities of these transistors. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 03:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
We can't even monkey-copy the datasheets correctly. This important and notable transistor doesn't even have its breakdown voltage listed correctly, and using it at 100 MHz is a hallucination by someone who hasn't read Ft = 200 MHz. I'm so glad all these parts list entries have been rescued, because otherwise someone might be mislead on the capabilities of these transistors. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 03:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Notability== |
|||
I don't think this topic is notable enough to be worth an encyclopedia article by itself. It's a parts list entry, not an encyclopedia article. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 13:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:30, 5 April 2011
Electronics Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Too specific
There should be an article comparing popular transistors or specific types or even a prominent link in the main transistor article to an outside article that does the same. (Isn't there an electronics/IC wiki somewhere?) The main references I have are either printed and hard to get anymore, or are scattered among thousands of PDFs - one per device type. Fairfield seems to have some good information.24.167.39.41 (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Just wrong
We can't even monkey-copy the datasheets correctly. This important and notable transistor doesn't even have its breakdown voltage listed correctly, and using it at 100 MHz is a hallucination by someone who hasn't read Ft = 200 MHz. I'm so glad all these parts list entries have been rescued, because otherwise someone might be mislead on the capabilities of these transistors. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Notability
I don't think this topic is notable enough to be worth an encyclopedia article by itself. It's a parts list entry, not an encyclopedia article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)