Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) Just not notable |
Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) →Just wrong: Still wrong, and why must we lie to readers? |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Just wrong== |
==Just wrong== |
||
We can't even monkey-copy the datasheets correctly. This important and notable transistor doesn't even have its breakdown voltage listed correctly, and using it at 100 MHz is a hallucination by someone who hasn't read Ft = 200 MHz. I'm so glad all these parts list entries have been rescued, because otherwise someone might be mislead on the capabilities of these transistors. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 03:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
We can't even monkey-copy the datasheets correctly. This important and notable transistor doesn't even have its breakdown voltage listed correctly, and using it at 100 MHz is a hallucination by someone who hasn't read Ft = 200 MHz. I'm so glad all these parts list entries have been rescued, because otherwise someone might be mislead on the capabilities of these transistors. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 03:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Notice how we carefully link volt and amp, because these are esoteric technical terms that a general encyclopedia reader might not recognize, but we sail past listing "Ft" as if we absorbed that knowledge from our mother's milk. This is now actively misleading, because the unwary bright 12-year-old reading this article might think that a 2N2907 is somehow *useful* at 200 MHZ. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 18:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==Notability== |
==Notability== |
Revision as of 18:17, 25 April 2011
Electronics Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Too specific
There should be an article comparing popular transistors or specific types or even a prominent link in the main transistor article to an outside article that does the same. (Isn't there an electronics/IC wiki somewhere?) The main references I have are either printed and hard to get anymore, or are scattered among thousands of PDFs - one per device type. Fairfield seems to have some good information.24.167.39.41 (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Just wrong
We can't even monkey-copy the datasheets correctly. This important and notable transistor doesn't even have its breakdown voltage listed correctly, and using it at 100 MHz is a hallucination by someone who hasn't read Ft = 200 MHz. I'm so glad all these parts list entries have been rescued, because otherwise someone might be mislead on the capabilities of these transistors. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Notice how we carefully link volt and amp, because these are esoteric technical terms that a general encyclopedia reader might not recognize, but we sail past listing "Ft" as if we absorbed that knowledge from our mother's milk. This is now actively misleading, because the unwary bright 12-year-old reading this article might think that a 2N2907 is somehow *useful* at 200 MHZ. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Notability
I don't think this topic is notable enough to be worth an encyclopedia article by itself. It's a parts list entry, not an encyclopedia article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)