→The Vikings' NFC standing: new section Tag: New topic |
Frank Anchor (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{ping|Frank Anchor}} - The Vikings did enter the game with the second-best NFC record. The Cowboys had the same 10–3 record ahead of Week 15. This adds to the point of the sentence that the Vikings were in strong position to advance to the postseason as a division winner (unlike the Eagles in the NFC East, the Vikings were the only NFC North team with a winning record). It also demonstrates the strength of their conference position, which further highlights the main storyline surrounding their playoff legitimacy this season. I won't re-add this if other editors are opposed, but I still consider it important context to this storyline. [[User:Bluerules|Bluerules]] ([[User talk:Bluerules|talk]]) 04:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC) |
{{ping|Frank Anchor}} - The Vikings did enter the game with the second-best NFC record. The Cowboys had the same 10–3 record ahead of Week 15. This adds to the point of the sentence that the Vikings were in strong position to advance to the postseason as a division winner (unlike the Eagles in the NFC East, the Vikings were the only NFC North team with a winning record). It also demonstrates the strength of their conference position, which further highlights the main storyline surrounding their playoff legitimacy this season. I won't re-add this if other editors are opposed, but I still consider it important context to this storyline. [[User:Bluerules|Bluerules]] ([[User talk:Bluerules|talk]]) 04:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks for your clarification. <span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">'''[[User:Frank Anchor|<span style="color: #FF8200;">Frank</span>]] [[User talk:Frank Anchor|<span style="color: #58595B;">Anchor</span>]]'''</span> 13:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit warring == |
|||
It appears that there have been [[WP:EDITWAR|edit wars]] involving myself, [[User:BlueRules]], and [[User:PeeJay]] among others involving simple content issues. Having been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=block&user=&page=User%3APeeJay&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslist blocked 15 times for edit warring in the past]), I am sure PeeJay is familiar with this policy. I am just posting a friendly reminder to all involved (including myself) that engaging in discussion, rather than edit warring, is the most productive way to make constructive edits. <span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">'''[[User:Frank Anchor|<span style="color: #FF8200;">Frank</span>]] [[User talk:Frank Anchor|<span style="color: #58595B;">Anchor</span>]]'''</span> 13:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:59, 20 December 2022
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What to call this game?
I was thinking Minneapolis Miracle ll but if someone has something better or should wait for an official name? Hoth Veteran (talk) 22:59, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- If something becomes popular like the Minneapolis Miracle, then the article would be changed. However, if a nickname does not become "official", then the name it has now is fine. Kellis7 23:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Game Summary
I think that the game summary should be moved from the main article to this one. I would assume that it would be copied from that article and pasted here, with attributions going to the editors to wrote it up on that article. Cherrell410 (talk) 03:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
The Vikings' NFC standing
@Frank Anchor: - The Vikings did enter the game with the second-best NFC record. The Cowboys had the same 10–3 record ahead of Week 15. This adds to the point of the sentence that the Vikings were in strong position to advance to the postseason as a division winner (unlike the Eagles in the NFC East, the Vikings were the only NFC North team with a winning record). It also demonstrates the strength of their conference position, which further highlights the main storyline surrounding their playoff legitimacy this season. I won't re-add this if other editors are opposed, but I still consider it important context to this storyline. Bluerules (talk) 04:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring
It appears that there have been edit wars involving myself, User:BlueRules, and User:PeeJay among others involving simple content issues. Having been blocked 15 times for edit warring in the past), I am sure PeeJay is familiar with this policy. I am just posting a friendly reminder to all involved (including myself) that engaging in discussion, rather than edit warring, is the most productive way to make constructive edits. Frank Anchor 13:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)