Horse Eye's Back (talk | contribs) →Ownership issues...: new section |
Mickie-Mickie (talk | contribs) Replied a named inquiry |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
{{Ping|Mickie-Mickie}} I think you need to review [[WP:OWN]]. This. Is. Not. Your. Page. [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 23:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC) |
{{Ping|Mickie-Mickie}} I think you need to review [[WP:OWN]]. This. Is. Not. Your. Page. [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 23:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
Dear HorseEye's Back, Wikipedia is an open resource, hence nobody claims the ownership on any article here. Please don't put your words on other people's mouths as in your [[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]] page, or in the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard|Dispute Resolution Noticeboard]] discussion before. The entire process of research and edits are to seek the truth whereas the public has the right to know, particularly when the evidences were systematically destroyed and the witnesses were silenced as dead people can't talk with 30 years of denial, ignorance and lies to forge a fake hero prestige covering [[fascism]] and protecting privileges till the military literature award still cheating the public last autumn... Every clue of intelligence and forensics is open to exam, and you are surely welcome to join in filling the missing link in history at any time of your preference. However dictating a simplified "gold rule" to eliminate reference unprofessionally against the freedom of media with a hidden agenda in another 30 years will not be possible. We were nobody but little servicemen simply let people know [[White Terror (Taiwan)|what happened]] to prevent the history repeating by any excuse again. Thanks for your attention, and hope you have a good day! Sincerely, [[User:Mickie-Mickie|Mickie-Mickie]] ([[User talk:Mickie-Mickie|talk]]) 01:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:47, 28 October 2020
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Potato Riots which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Edit required
This article suffers from poor English. It urgently requires an edit.Royalcourtier (talk) 01:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Taiwan's lack of refugee law
"Over 100 years after its establishment in 1911, Republic of China still doesn't have the Refugee Law today."
Taiwan does posses laws surrounding the treatments of refugees, eg. Art. 19 of the 1999 Immigration Act https://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0080132
http://aprrn.info/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Taiwan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.145.241 (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
The 1999 Act applies to the regular immigration applicant, not for the refugees and the Stateless people as the UN Refugee Convention defines. The real Refugee Act of Taiwan ( https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%9B%A3%E6%B0%91%E6%B3%95%E8%8D%89%E6%A1%88 ) was rejected in 2005, 2006, 2009, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2019 and 2020, and several cases such as Kurds have been repatriated back against the international refugee law in 2013 and 2019 -- Sincerely, Mickie-Mickie
Ownership issues...
@Mickie-Mickie: I think you need to review WP:OWN. This. Is. Not. Your. Page. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Dear HorseEye's Back, Wikipedia is an open resource, hence nobody claims the ownership on any article here. Please don't put your words on other people's mouths as in your talk page, or in the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard discussion before. The entire process of research and edits are to seek the truth whereas the public has the right to know, particularly when the evidences were systematically destroyed and the witnesses were silenced as dead people can't talk with 30 years of denial, ignorance and lies to forge a fake hero prestige covering fascism and protecting privileges till the military literature award still cheating the public last autumn... Every clue of intelligence and forensics is open to exam, and you are surely welcome to join in filling the missing link in history at any time of your preference. However dictating a simplified "gold rule" to eliminate reference unprofessionally against the freedom of media with a hidden agenda in another 30 years will not be possible. We were nobody but little servicemen simply let people know what happened to prevent the history repeating by any excuse again. Thanks for your attention, and hope you have a good day! Sincerely, Mickie-Mickie (talk) 01:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)