82.195.149.119 (talk) →question: new section |
Dan Murphy (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
: I support. But at the moment the formatting of the article is screwed up.[[User:Bali ultimate|Bali ultimate]] ([[User talk:Bali ultimate|talk]]) 13:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC) |
: I support. But at the moment the formatting of the article is screwed up.[[User:Bali ultimate|Bali ultimate]] ([[User talk:Bali ultimate|talk]]) 13:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Just a small note, the page is a FL, but don't let that affect any decisions. [[WP:FLRC|The removal criteria]] says that pages can be speedily delisted if a consensus elsehwere. If a decision to merge is reached, just start a quick FLRC and it should be removed reasonably quickly. -- '''[[User:Scorpion0422|<font color="#32CD32">Scorpion</font>]][[user talk:Scorpion0422|<font color="Green">O'422</font>]]''' 16:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC) |
:Just a small note, the page is a FL, but don't let that affect any decisions. [[WP:FLRC|The removal criteria]] says that pages can be speedily delisted if a consensus elsehwere. If a decision to merge is reached, just start a quick FLRC and it should be removed reasonably quickly. -- '''[[User:Scorpion0422|<font color="#32CD32">Scorpion</font>]][[user talk:Scorpion0422|<font color="Green">O'422</font>]]''' 16:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
== question == |
|||
How come I can edit Bruen but not William Monahan? I got other questions too like why's the article old now? Answer me dammit. ( [[Special:Contributions/82.195.149.119|82.195.149.119]] ([[User talk:82.195.149.119|talk]]) 00:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC) ) |
Revision as of 00:48, 30 March 2009
Biography: Actors and Filmmakers FA‑class | ||||||||||
|
Screenwriters FA‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
United States: Massachusetts Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
United States: University of Massachusetts Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
William Monahan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 3, 2007. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
Rewrite
Not sure what this looked like when assessed FA; hopefully not like it does now. Loaded with non-notable trivia, bloated and unsourced writting, etc... The original author (who wrote this under a variety of guises) is now indef-blocked, so will try to make this encyclopedic and readable without the drama.Bali ultimate (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed merge
I am proposing (for a 2nd time---first time is in the talk archives) to merge the List of articles by William Monahan into the present article. The list of works, when shorn of the extremely minor essays which don't belong here anyway, is not very long, there are only a few significant works, and it is basic content that would fit well in the present article. the present article also is not too long, once the trivial material is removed, as suggested by Bali above. The only person who really defended the existence of the separate article was a now-banned sock pupettter, and some of his many puppets. DGG (talk) 01:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- I support. But at the moment the formatting of the article is screwed up.Bali ultimate (talk) 13:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Just a small note, the page is a FL, but don't let that affect any decisions. The removal criteria says that pages can be speedily delisted if a consensus elsehwere. If a decision to merge is reached, just start a quick FLRC and it should be removed reasonably quickly. -- ScorpionO'422 16:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)