LucVerhelst (talk | contribs) |
LucVerhelst (talk | contribs) Neocons |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
The present article seems to grow to long (over 30 Kb, which seems to be the threshold to start and split up articles, see [[WP:SS]]). Any thoughts on splitting up ? --[[User:LucVerhelst|LucVerhelst]] 11:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC) |
The present article seems to grow to long (over 30 Kb, which seems to be the threshold to start and split up articles, see [[WP:SS]]). Any thoughts on splitting up ? --[[User:LucVerhelst|LucVerhelst]] 11:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Neocons == |
|||
I don't understand why Intangible keeps removing the sentence on the neoconservative inspiration for the Vlaams Belang party program. It is well referenced and verifiable, that Gerolf Annemans, main author of the program, himself has said this influence is clear : "In het normen- en waardendebat ben ik sterk uitgegaan van wat in Amerikaanse kringen van de neoconservatieven allang wordt gezegd. Ik kan die beïnvloeding niet ontkennen." ("''In the values debate I started from what since long is being said in American circles of the neoconservatives. I can't deny that influence.''" -- {{nl icon}} "[http://www.demorgen.be/dossiers/artikel.html?articletable=artikels2004&i=MjAwNDExMTcgMzEzNzIwNTY2QzYxNjE2RDczMjA0MjY1Njg2MTZFNjc=&ih=h=h= De neoconservatieve mosterd van Gerolf Annemans en Philip Dewinter]" ("''The neoconservative mustard of Gerolf Annemans and Philip Dewinter''"), De Morgen, 17 November 2004.) |
|||
Not only is it well referenced and verifiable, I don't see what is so controversial about it that Intangible seems to be starting another edit war about it. --[[User:LucVerhelst|LucVerhelst]] 12:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:08, 9 August 2006
Please add new discussions to the bottom of the page !
![]() |
1 2 3 |
Talk Archives / Previous discussions
I've achived the older discussions, because the page was so long, and it's nicer to start afresh anyway. -- Joolz 15:03, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Discussions in Archive01 correspond with the following historical version of the Flemish Interest article. -- --Jvb – April 18, 2005
I've archived entries up to 1 december 2005 at Archive02 -- LucVerhelst 11:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- The partial transfer of discussions to Archive02 corresponds with the following historical versions of Vlaams Belang and its discussion page -- --Jvb – December 21, 2005
I've archived entries up to 8 August 2006 at Archive03 --LucVerhelst 10:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- The partial transfer of discussions to Archive03 corresponds with the following historical versions of Vlaams Belang and its discussion page --LucVerhelst 10:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
History section
I have expanded the history section. I used information from a number of other Wikipedia articles, both from the English language as from the Dutch language Wikipedia.
Off course, feel free to contribute constructively . --LucVerhelst 11:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- This can all be detailed in the Vlaams Blok article and elsewhere. Intangible 16:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Feel free to add to the next section ("Outline"). --LucVerhelst 17:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Outline
I'm thinking about a reworking of the article, towards a quality, NPOV, encyclopaedic article.
What do you think ?
I was thinking about the following outline :
- Introduction
- Party History
- Volksunie
- Vlaams Blok
- Trial
- Government subsidies
- Electoral results
- Vlaams Blok
- Vlaams Belang
- Ideology and issues
- Platform + discussion
- Cordon Sanitaire
- Issues
- Representation
- European parliament
- Federal parliament : Senate
- Federal parliament : Chambre
- Flemish parliament
- Brussels parliament
- Electorate
- Present Party structure
- Party organisation
- Other members
- External links
- References
Does this make sense ?
The present article seems to grow to long (over 30 Kb, which seems to be the threshold to start and split up articles, see WP:SS). Any thoughts on splitting up ? --LucVerhelst 11:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Neocons
I don't understand why Intangible keeps removing the sentence on the neoconservative inspiration for the Vlaams Belang party program. It is well referenced and verifiable, that Gerolf Annemans, main author of the program, himself has said this influence is clear : "In het normen- en waardendebat ben ik sterk uitgegaan van wat in Amerikaanse kringen van de neoconservatieven allang wordt gezegd. Ik kan die beïnvloeding niet ontkennen." ("In the values debate I started from what since long is being said in American circles of the neoconservatives. I can't deny that influence." -- Template:Nl icon "De neoconservatieve mosterd van Gerolf Annemans en Philip Dewinter" ("The neoconservative mustard of Gerolf Annemans and Philip Dewinter"), De Morgen, 17 November 2004.)
Not only is it well referenced and verifiable, I don't see what is so controversial about it that Intangible seems to be starting another edit war about it. --LucVerhelst 12:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)