m Signing comment by Branmacmuffin - "→General notability guidelines query: new section" |
→Just pointing something out: new section |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<br /> |
<br /> |
||
Is it a case of not enough 3rd party sources? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Branmacmuffin|Branmacmuffin]] ([[User talk:Branmacmuffin|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Branmacmuffin|contribs]]) 16:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Is it a case of not enough 3rd party sources? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Branmacmuffin|Branmacmuffin]] ([[User talk:Branmacmuffin|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Branmacmuffin|contribs]]) 16:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Just pointing something out == |
|||
I won't probably participate on this a lot since since my actions could be seen as part of the GamerGate controversy, but really for one second let's think straight here, how the hell is this game notable? Even more, how can it be so long, its development section is longer than some triple AAA games. The main author seems to have a personal relationship with the developer, it's a truly Single-purpose account, and the article reads like an advertisement, it even cites Brianna Wu's own Tumblr for god's sake. Half the sources are to "iMore" and a podcast noone ever heard of, Gamesauce isn't RS, neither is "GameBreaker.tv", then you got another podcast called "Devchat.tv"? Noone hasn't even heard of these sites, so far the only sources that could stand are Kotaku and Eurogamer (which barely mentions the game). The Guardian mentions it as part of the GamerGate controversy, but the difference with Zoe Quinn's game is that her game was previously mentioned separate from the controversy. I'll propose its deletion soon, I'm really trying to be neutral, but this article is laughable [[User:Loganmac|Loganmac]] ([[User talk:Loganmac|talk]]) 16:48, 17 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:48, 17 December 2014
Video games Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Response to Conflict of Interest accusation
I was asked in a public forum by Brianna W, the lead developer of the game if I could do improve this page as she could not due to a conflict of interest https://mobile.twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/529632613682909185. As a fan of the game I did so. My edits have been fair to the point of including negative reviews, and I have provided what I believe are sufficient citations from verifiable sources. I have no connection to the game developers other than 'follows' on Twitter and expect no compensation in any form from those affected for editing this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Branmacmuffin (talk • contribs) 06:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
General notability guidelines query
I'm curious as to why this has arisen.
The topic has received coverage in numerous press articles pertaining to the game itself and not to the developers
The sources are verifiable
The sources, where possible are secondary. However, where background factual detail on the game itself has been required, this has been supplied by the lead developer in interviews. Such information has been restricted to objective information.
"Independent of the subject" - where facts about the game are required, I've accessed different areas, including reviews (not press releases) and interviews.
Is it a case of not enough 3rd party sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Branmacmuffin (talk • contribs) 16:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Just pointing something out
I won't probably participate on this a lot since since my actions could be seen as part of the GamerGate controversy, but really for one second let's think straight here, how the hell is this game notable? Even more, how can it be so long, its development section is longer than some triple AAA games. The main author seems to have a personal relationship with the developer, it's a truly Single-purpose account, and the article reads like an advertisement, it even cites Brianna Wu's own Tumblr for god's sake. Half the sources are to "iMore" and a podcast noone ever heard of, Gamesauce isn't RS, neither is "GameBreaker.tv", then you got another podcast called "Devchat.tv"? Noone hasn't even heard of these sites, so far the only sources that could stand are Kotaku and Eurogamer (which barely mentions the game). The Guardian mentions it as part of the GamerGate controversy, but the difference with Zoe Quinn's game is that her game was previously mentioned separate from the controversy. I'll propose its deletion soon, I'm really trying to be neutral, but this article is laughable Loganmac (talk) 16:48, 17 December 2014 (UTC)