Andrew Norman (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 208.47.99.78 (talk) to last version by Andrew Norman |
208.47.98.254 (talk) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Constant Vandal == |
== Constant Vandal == |
||
I posted a bit about the research justifying manna as the mushroom... |
|||
It was a scientific study called the "Good Friday Experiment", I love how every time |
|||
there really is convincing evidence people deny it in favor of closed minded views. |
|||
I am sorry that none of you have had the gift of vision, but other people would like to speak to God, and to inhibit the increase in acurate knowledge (which is pointless because the secret is out) you are shameful and despicable. It is obvious that you are all Godless creatures. None of you seem to know anything about manna, so why do you try to deny those of us that do? It IS MY GOD we are talking about here, and some of us take that seriously. If you do not have God's will to be working on this page you shouldn't deny those of us that are called to it. |
|||
This is not some little fringe topic this is the potential salvation of mankind. With warring muslims jews and christians, dont you think that the plan calls for something to unify? IT DOES. |
|||
You can thank the mushroom for the increase in the mental capacity of your monkey ancestors, you can thank the mushroom for everything from the developement of language to the declaration of independance. But you do not give any respect to that which is higher than you and for that I pray... |
|||
God have mercy on the blind. |
|||
PS Manna is not for squares, so if you aren't hip just get lost. |
|||
Does anyone want to back me up on this constant reverting? I mean, the person who keeps putting irrelevent, weird bible rants shouldn't be doing that, right? I'm cool with reverting them, right? Why is it always ''me'' doing it? Does anyone else read this article? |
Does anyone want to back me up on this constant reverting? I mean, the person who keeps putting irrelevent, weird bible rants shouldn't be doing that, right? I'm cool with reverting them, right? Why is it always ''me'' doing it? Does anyone else read this article? |
Revision as of 19:16, 11 May 2006
- Part of this talk page has been archived here on May 8 2006 (UTC).
Cleanup and Accuracy tags added
This is article is pretty embarrasing. It has included this for almost 2 months, not as a attributed quote, but as part of the article.
- "Then said the LORD unto Moses, Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather a certain rate every day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law or no. Exodus(16:4). And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground. Exodus(16: 14). And when the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another It is manna: for they wist not what it was. And Moses said unto them, This is the bread which the Lord hath given you to eat. And the house of Israel called the name there of manna: and it was like coriander seed, white; and the taste of it was like wafers made with honey. Exodus(l6: 31). And Moses said, This is the thing which the LORD commandeth. Fill an omer of it to be kept for your generations: that they may see the bread where with I have fed you in the wilderness, when I brought you forth from the land of Egypt. Exodus(16: 32). And after the second vail, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all: Which had the golden censer and the Ark of the Covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna. Hebrews 9:3&4 But now our soul is dried away: there is nothing at all, beside this manna, before our eyes. And the manna was as coriander seed, and the colour thereof as the colour of bdelliaum. And the people went about and gathered it, and ground it in mills, or beat it in a mortar and baked it in pans: and made cakes of it: and the taste of it was as the taste of fresh oil. And when the dew fell upon the camp in the night, the manna fell upon it."
Much of the content throughout is from a Jewish or Christian point of view. The real need is cleanup, but I put on the accuracy tag also because there were substantive content changes made from an IP (82.35.86.253) that also made some of the offending edits, so that needs to get parsed out. -Bubamara 01:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I made some crude edits to make it less . . . bad. But it needs some work still. -Bubamara 01:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- oh my. User 136.245.4.252 has made more bad edits to the page (and to this talk page, above). -Bubamara 08:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Well.... I'm new to all this jazz....
This is one of the few good articles on manna that I've seen:
http://www.bibleorigins.net/MannaSinaiBodenheimer.html
Hope it helps...
I ask the observant to notice how the candidates for manna in the above link do not even match the description given in Exodus 16, If you would like to think that it's something other than the sacred mushroom you have two options: Go ahead to the detriment of mankind and the disapointment of God, or go find some manna. I am sorry that you have to deal with the organized crime to recieve your sacrament, you should vote against idiots next time. REPEAL NIXONIAN LAW. I mean really wasn't JFK nice? --Mannaseejah 06:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)-
Constant Vandal
I posted a bit about the research justifying manna as the mushroom... It was a scientific study called the "Good Friday Experiment", I love how every time there really is convincing evidence people deny it in favor of closed minded views. I am sorry that none of you have had the gift of vision, but other people would like to speak to God, and to inhibit the increase in acurate knowledge (which is pointless because the secret is out) you are shameful and despicable. It is obvious that you are all Godless creatures. None of you seem to know anything about manna, so why do you try to deny those of us that do? It IS MY GOD we are talking about here, and some of us take that seriously. If you do not have God's will to be working on this page you shouldn't deny those of us that are called to it.
This is not some little fringe topic this is the potential salvation of mankind. With warring muslims jews and christians, dont you think that the plan calls for something to unify? IT DOES.
You can thank the mushroom for the increase in the mental capacity of your monkey ancestors, you can thank the mushroom for everything from the developement of language to the declaration of independance. But you do not give any respect to that which is higher than you and for that I pray...
God have mercy on the blind.
PS Manna is not for squares, so if you aren't hip just get lost.
Does anyone want to back me up on this constant reverting? I mean, the person who keeps putting irrelevent, weird bible rants shouldn't be doing that, right? I'm cool with reverting them, right? Why is it always me doing it? Does anyone else read this article?
Sparsefarce 21:35, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're doing the right thing. I just stumbled across this page but it's now on my watchlist and I'll keep an eye on it, too. It certainly needs a lot of work but I'm afraid I don't care enough or know enough about this subject to clean it up. But I can certainly keep if from getting any worse. :) --ElKevbo 22:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- that's kind of where i am. i'm just trying to keep it from getting worse too. Sparsefarce 23:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't vandalism, it is a content dispute. Please treat it as such and we weary of the 3RR. ---J.S (t|c) 21:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm I take that back... this is somewhere between content dispute and vandalism. ---J.S (t|c) 21:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's hard to separate those two (content dispute and vandalism) in this article. No offense to anyone, but I find some edits to this article downright weird. It's hard to separate the well-intended but poorly-written additions from vandalism. --ElKevbo 22:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm I take that back... this is somewhere between content dispute and vandalism. ---J.S (t|c) 21:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't vandalism, it is a content dispute. Please treat it as such and we weary of the 3RR. ---J.S (t|c) 21:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Manna as a mushroom
Wow... Mannaseejah, you need to calm down a bit. I think you have something with the Manna as a Mushroom, but we need to approach it in an academic way. Help me find some reliable sources so we can present verification that the theory exists. (I know I've heard the theory before... so I know that this isn't just OR) ---J.S (t|c) 21:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- i agree. i mean, if there's some serious evidence out there that talks about manna being psychedelic mushrooms, then that definitely needs to be in there, but form is incredibly important. the strange edits that the user keeps putting into this article are not encyclopedic. i mean, just look at the top of the talk page here. (personally i think that the top of the talk page needs to be cleared off. wikipedia is not a soapbox, and that goes for talk pages, too) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparsefarce (talk • contribs)
To my fellow wikipedians:
Well this is interesting guys, I was thinking about it and everything... I KNOW what it is, and I know that there is far more evidence than I could ever even assemble, never mind try to explain in a crappy language like english (Except shakespeare) but God knows I tryed and will continue to try. The problem really is that english itself is a veil of the truth unlike hebrew and aramaic. (That is not to say that english doesn't have something good about it; can't really think of what it is but... I think in this other language and when it comes out in english it only makes sense if you understand the word varience and multiple meanings and symbols and parody and comedy and all these things related to an ancient language that nobody speaks and many unfortunate minds simply cannot handle it.
I realized that not everyone is supposed to know this information... yet. Some people are too young or don't have nearly the amount of faith in God to deal with the implications of HIS knowledge. So I came to the page today, not to make sure that all my stuff was still there, but to delete it myself.
This knowledge is such a beautiful burden to bear, but to the unexpecting it is potentially damaging. As a frustrated and confused child of a very big and sometimes scary God (Or the biggest and scariest God as most are well aware of), I do not have any right to place burdens on the shoulders of babes.
So I have decided to create a site with a disclaimer and more organized navigation to reveal the secret. Some say there are few that are worthy, however that is not my call to make. It is God's will and it is God's plan. Knowledge will increase in this age, and there is a very big shift underway. Behind closed doors there are people making things happen: My frustration is in my unworthiness.
It would be nice to think that I had the freedom and liberty to propegate my beliefs however in this day I DO NOT. Once again I am faced with ignorance and it was my face and not the pope's. And so by putting this knowledge which I willingly sought, forcably into people's heads I realized just tonight (with help from the unseen) a few things:
1.) I was doing injustice to seekers of knowledge 2.) I was doinging injustice to the knowledge itself
3.) I was not in accordance to HIS WILL (This is the hardest thing for me)
4.) And God forbid I was proposing to strap a yoke the size of jupiter on unwilling little lambs.
I concede to my human limitations, I am no better than a greedy president or yeast munching Roman
(However I am still working on forgiving the vatican for mass genocide and other crimes that it has committed ever since stealing the religion of the most beautiful man to ever live, and ruining it for most everyone. I have faith God will judge them on an individual basis in 100% truth, and I have faith that Rome's days are numbered. God's will be done.)
This is getting long but I am really trying to get something accross here... Please bear with me, this one last time.
Part II of my final wikipedia rant:
Freedom of Religion is my main frustration in life. One thing I do know, is that what I don't see and what I don't know is much greater than what little I do know and what little I am (quite litterally and even by my own standards) capable of visualizing. I cry and beg for mercy from my lord constantly and I know his mercy is great...
Please forgive me if I seemed fanatical. I am A harmless fanatic of God, peace, liberty and all kinds of other stuff I'm not probably not worthy; however this is my calling.
God bless you all, and thank you for not banning me. Unfortunately any information I have to add to this site is not designed for this site and visa versa. I retire as a failed wikipedian. Knowledge is unfortunately still controlled by rome. As controlled as my sacrament unfortunately.
Possibly wikipedia is just not the place (or time) for the information that lies beyond the veil. No not here, definately for another spot. I'm just glad that I realized this myself before I did anything worse in my ignorance. I commend you all for good work.
Sincerely the overly wize fool (Hebrew: Gershom Koheleth) --Mannaseejah 07:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)