Educationtemple (talk | contribs) |
Ugog Nizdast (talk | contribs) WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2014: assessed as mid imp |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|s&a-work-group=yes |
|s&a-work-group=yes |
||
|listas=Singh, Lalji |
|listas=Singh, Lalji |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject India|class=GA |
{{WikiProject India|class=GA |
||
|importance=}} |
|importance=mid|assess-date=March 2015}} |
||
{{dyktalk|13 February|2015|entry= ... that '''[[Lalji Singh]]''' ''(pictured)'' is popularly known as the "Father of DNA Fingerprinting" in India?}} |
{{dyktalk|13 February|2015|entry= ... that '''[[Lalji Singh]]''' ''(pictured)'' is popularly known as the "Father of DNA Fingerprinting" in India?}} |
||
Revision as of 08:44, 5 March 2015
Biography: Science and Academia GA‑class | ||||||||||
|
India GA‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lalji Singh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) 16:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Review
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Notes
I made some improvements to the article, but some things still need tending to:
"These findings later became the foundation for the discovery of a similar phenomenon of sex reversal in human." needs a ref.All of the things listed in "Awards and Honors" that don't have refs need them.Nevermind- While not required, a little more copyediting would be great.
--AmaryllisGardener talk 17:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Assuming w.carter is done copyediting, I've decided to promote this article to GA. --AmaryllisGardener talk 01:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Recent format editing by a user
Dear @W.carter:, I noticed that a user had done lots of citation format editing on Lalji Singh. We had discussed the citation format in length and these were also checked by other senior editors, reviewed in GA too. Are the changes made by the user @Skr15081997: appropriate?? If not, {{u|Skr15081997)) should explain, why he did it being an experienced user and I request him to undo them in that case. Views? Educationtemple (talk) 14:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- The Times of India is a newspaper and should be used in the
|work=
parameter instead of|publisher
. Publisher for The Times of India is The Times Group.
References
- ^ "Nailing a criminal the DNA way". http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); More than one of|website=
|work=
and|website=
specified (help)
--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks @W.carter: for the advise and revert. Thanks to @Skr15081997: too for "good edits" (that you could please go ahead and do by saving them in between, as per the discussion above. Cheers! Educationtemple (talk) 14:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- I hadn't removed all of the
|website=
. Please check the edit carefully. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)- @Educationtemple: If you are so much concerned about linkrot then you should use
|archiveurl=
and|archivedate=
. Use https://archive.org/web/ to track archived versions of the cited url. Providing a bare url in the|website=
field isn't an aesthetic solution to the problem. I still can't understand why my edit was reverted.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:43, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Educationtemple: If you are so much concerned about linkrot then you should use
- I hadn't removed all of the
I acted too soon and have apologized to the injured party. w.carter-Talk 14:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Cheers my friends! I too thanked @Skr15081997: for his original edits. Let me learn something here, I am trying to understand archive.org, how it functions! Cheers! Educationtemple (talk) 15:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)