Tag: Undo |
Brian Josephson (talk | contribs) Undid revision 967253644 This is a talk page not an article: do not edit items by other users. If you have criticisms, add them below the edit. Tag: Undo |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
[[User:BarryNL1|BarryNL1]] ([[User talk:BarryNL1|talk]]) 13:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
[[User:BarryNL1|BarryNL1]] ([[User talk:BarryNL1|talk]]) 13:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
:I agree entirely. The [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Guerrilla_Skepticism_on_Wikipedia Guerilla Skeptics] have taken over this page, as they so often do. --[[User:Brian Josephson|Brian Josephson]] ([[User talk:Brian Josephson|talk]]) 20:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:42, 12 July 2020
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
I J Good paper
Super556 and 82.132.214.149, This little edit war is a bit inappropriate. Please discuss on the talk page. Remember the "D" in WP:BRD. I can find zero evidence that this journal article was in any way retracted or that any correction was issued. If it was, what part was corrected, and does it affect the part of article that still cites this article? 0x0077BE (talk · contrib) 23:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Not a biography
I wanted to gain an impression of Dean Radin's life and work to date but, as it now is, this bio appears to be little more than a chance to put forward criticism of Radin and his career.
Criticism has its place but this page does seem to be unable to state anything positive at all and is therefore rendered one-sided, inadequate and, regrettably, unworthy of publication by Wikipedia.
BarryNL1 (talk) 13:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- I agree entirely. The Guerilla Skeptics have taken over this page, as they so often do. --Brian Josephson (talk) 20:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)