Bharatiya29 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
:@[[User:FreeatlastChitchat|FreeatlastChitchat]] If you think that the source and the person who gave the interview are unreliable, then prove it on [[WP:RSN]]. And please stop removing every pro-Indian content just because of your personal bias against Indian sources. [[User:Bharatiya29|<font color="#FF9933">Bharatiya</font>]][[User talk:Bharatiya29|<font color="#138808">29</font>]] 07:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC) |
:@[[User:FreeatlastChitchat|FreeatlastChitchat]] If you think that the source and the person who gave the interview are unreliable, then prove it on [[WP:RSN]]. And please stop removing every pro-Indian content just because of your personal bias against Indian sources. [[User:Bharatiya29|<font color="#FF9933">Bharatiya</font>]][[User talk:Bharatiya29|<font color="#138808">29</font>]] 07:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
::Pro-Indian content?? So you agree that you are just here to push your/Indian POV into a Pakistan related article? BTW, the info/POV you are trying to push is from a woman who belongs to BSO-Azad - a terrorist organization. I doubt Wikipedia is a propaganda mouthpiece of terrorists organizations. Also, this women, who is she? Why is here propaganda so important that she gets a space here at Wiki? Is she reliable? Only info I can find on her is from Baloch propaganda/terrorist websites which are no good then Al-Qaeda's propaganda websites. Lastly, the IP and FM are using similar modus oprendi to push the same POV by taking turns. I suspect some meat/sock-puppetry.—[[User:TripWire|<font face="Eras Demi ITC" size="3px"><b><font color="DarkMagenta">Trip</font><font color="DarkSlateGray">Wire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ </font></b></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:TripWire|ʞlɐʇ]] </sup> 09:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:40, 9 May 2016
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Map
Shouldnt the map also show the conflicted area in Iran? It is only showing the balochistan part of pakistan.Sohebbasharat (talk) 23:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
adding to article
Have made a lot of additions to the article. I use a lot of "according to ..." before telling what was said, and used a lot of quotations. I may make the writing more clunky but I thought it necessary because of the sensitive nature of the topic.
Have also separated info on the conflict in Iran in a separate section. Almost all the article is about the conflict in Pakistan that I thought it would server users better to consolidate the Iran story in one section and add more info to it. -- BoogaLouie (talk) 22:16, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Indian involvement
You cannot state, as fact, that India has admitted support for Baloch rebels. I would ask that another editor revert this repeated introduction of inappropriate material. Also, the conflict has not subsided and claiming this is rather silly. Curro2 (talk) 02:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Curro2 did you even read the source which I am using? And the sources clearly states that the attack have largely decreased over the period of time 5.36.5.59 (talk) 02:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Balochistan conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140324171548/http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=142289 to http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=142289
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141023122109/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/13/false_flag to http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/13/false_flag
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130116212816/http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=48484 to http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=48484
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101011084818/http://maloykrishnadhar.com/balochistan-cruces-of-history-part-ii to http://maloykrishnadhar.com/balochistan-cruces-of-history-part-ii
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150724211655/http://www.terminalx.org/2012/02/indian-raws-kao-plan-unleashed-in.html to http://www.terminalx.org/2012/02/indian-raws-kao-plan-unleashed-in.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131014190119/http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=14998&Cat=2&dt=5/6/2011 to http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=14998&Cat=2&dt=5/6/2011
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151222084018/http://www.terminalx.org/2014/07/influential-baloch-lobby-group-in-us-decides-to-end-activism-against-pakistan.html to http://www.terminalx.org/2014/07/influential-baloch-lobby-group-in-us-decides-to-end-activism-against-pakistan.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141016183559/http://epaper.dawn.com/print-textview.php?StoryImage=08_09_2014_008_006 to http://epaper.dawn.com/print-textview.php?StoryImage=08_09_2014_008_006
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110516152149/http://www.hindu.com:80/2005/01/18/stories/2005011808360100.htm to http://www.hindu.com/2005/01/18/stories/2005011808360100.htm
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120430202004/http://www.centralasiaonline.com/en_GB/articles/caii/features/pakistan/2010/04/09/feature-01 to http://www.centralasiaonline.com/en_GB/articles/caii/features/pakistan/2010/04/09/feature-01
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101027185144/http://www.amnesty.org:80/en/news-and-updates/pakistan-urged-investigate-murder-and-torture-baloch-activists-2010-10-26 to http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/pakistan-urged-investigate-murder-and-torture-baloch-activists-2010-10-26
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110122090834/http://thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=8617 to http://www.thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=8617
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Content removal
Why is sourced information being removed? The sources support it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedom Mouse (talk • contribs) 05:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Freedom Mouse because the sources do not support the said statements, or sources are not reliable as per WP:RS and sources are not present. Also some of the content has very bad language and was unintelligible. If you have some reliable sources for the content please link them here I will put in the content and attach the citations myself. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
The sources do support the content, and how are human rights watch and a mainstream newspaper not reliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedom Mouse (talk • contribs) 06:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Freedom Mouse The so called "newspaper" is from India and giving information from a non reliable person , hence it is unreliable. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Who are you to claim someone is unreliable? The newspaper quoting him obviously believed he was reliable for what he himself says, you removal sourced content on spurious grounds. ' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedom Mouse (talk • contribs) 06:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat If you think that the source and the person who gave the interview are unreliable, then prove it on WP:RSN. And please stop removing every pro-Indian content just because of your personal bias against Indian sources. Bharatiya29 07:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Pro-Indian content?? So you agree that you are just here to push your/Indian POV into a Pakistan related article? BTW, the info/POV you are trying to push is from a woman who belongs to BSO-Azad - a terrorist organization. I doubt Wikipedia is a propaganda mouthpiece of terrorists organizations. Also, this women, who is she? Why is here propaganda so important that she gets a space here at Wiki? Is she reliable? Only info I can find on her is from Baloch propaganda/terrorist websites which are no good then Al-Qaeda's propaganda websites. Lastly, the IP and FM are using similar modus oprendi to push the same POV by taking turns. I suspect some meat/sock-puppetry.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 09:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)