Content deleted Content added
Chrisjnelson (talk | contribs) |
Chrisjnelson (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{NewEnglandPatriotsProject}} |
{{NewEnglandPatriotsProject}} |
||
== |
== Cheating == |
||
I think the patriots cheating needs to be discussed, its pretty important to not only their season, but the Whole NFL.--[[User:Swainstonation|<sup><font color="Red">''The''</font></sup>]][[User talk:Swainstonation|<sup><font color="Blue">''Nation''</font></sup>]] 22:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
I think the patriots cheating needs to be discussed, its pretty important to not only their season, but the Whole NFL.--[[User:Swainstonation|<sup><font color="Red">''The''</font></sup>]][[User talk:Swainstonation|<sup><font color="Blue">''Nation''</font></sup>]] 22:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::There is nothing wrong with posting what the media has said. That is the story.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #005e6a">Nelson</span>]]''' 23:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
::There is nothing wrong with posting what the media has said. That is the story.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #005e6a">Nelson</span>]]''' 23:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Section heading== |
|||
The investigation was about "illegal videotaping." I can't see how you can argue this. Honestly, this is ridiculous. Spying has much broader, negative connotation connected to it and suggests more than what actually happened. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 19:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:"The investigation was about 'spying.' I can't see how you can argue this." They weren't being investigated because they were "illegally videotaping" the Jets. They were being investigated because they were spying on the other team and stealing their signals. Videotaping is just the method they used, but spying is the offense. '''[[User:Ksy92003|Ksy92003]]'''<small>[[User talk:Ksy92003|<font color="black">(talk)</font>]]</small> 20:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I don't really feel too strongly on the subject and I have no plans to edit anything related to this again. I agree with Pats1's argument here, and I disagree with Ksy92003 in saying videotaping was just the method. That is not true. The specific rule they broke WAS for videotaping, it is a more specific and totally accurate so it really can't be argued.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 21:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:02, 30 September 2007
National Football League Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
National Football League Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Cheating
I think the patriots cheating needs to be discussed, its pretty important to not only their season, but the Whole NFL.--TheNation 22:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing is preventing anyone from adding that information, provided it's fully sourced and is written from a NPOV. But it's difficult to source anything at this point, since everything is speculation -- the NFL hasn't said anything officially. Pats1 22:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- There is nothing wrong with posting what the media has said. That is the story.►Chris Nelson 23:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Section heading
The investigation was about "illegal videotaping." I can't see how you can argue this. Honestly, this is ridiculous. Spying has much broader, negative connotation connected to it and suggests more than what actually happened. Pats1 T/C 19:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- "The investigation was about 'spying.' I can't see how you can argue this." They weren't being investigated because they were "illegally videotaping" the Jets. They were being investigated because they were spying on the other team and stealing their signals. Videotaping is just the method they used, but spying is the offense. Ksy92003(talk) 20:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't really feel too strongly on the subject and I have no plans to edit anything related to this again. I agree with Pats1's argument here, and I disagree with Ksy92003 in saying videotaping was just the method. That is not true. The specific rule they broke WAS for videotaping, it is a more specific and totally accurate so it really can't be argued.►Chris NelsonHolla! 21:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)