The page "Rupert sheldrake" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review or request that a redirect be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- User talk:Cillian flood (section Rupert Sheldrake edit)Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rupert Sheldrake may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't...3 KB (391 words) - 08:53, 2 May 2014
- 67.178. You might not be aware of this, but we are quite aware that Rupert Sheldrake is a pseudoscientist and MR is pseudoscientific. The WP:REDFLAGs (for...1 KB (177 words) - 15:24, 20 October 2021
- User talk:8i347g8gl (section Sheldrake article)Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rupert Sheldrake may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't...9 KB (679 words) - 18:26, 22 January 2022
- previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Rupert Sheldrake. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you...98 KB (13,311 words) - 11:10, 21 April 2023
- December 2013 (UTC) Hi Matthew, just regarding your recent edits to Rupert Sheldrake please note that this page along with others related to pseudo or fringe...2 KB (262 words) - 03:35, 22 March 2014
- Hi. You've been reverted a few times at Rupert Sheldrake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). These changes have...3 KB (368 words) - 23:46, 15 February 2020
- User talk:HappyWanderer15/Archive 2 (section Sheldrake)I'll do so later in the week. There is definitely a problem with the Rupert Sheldrake article, and also with the users that have taken control of it. I'll...17 KB (2,483 words) - 00:40, 17 June 2020
- let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Rupert Sheldrake have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would...735 bytes (63 words) - 17:36, 8 January 2022
- 18 November 2013 (UTC) You have reverted three times today at the Rupert Sheldrake article. You are already aware that the article is subject to discretionary...24 KB (3,308 words) - 11:08, 12 January 2014
- Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rupert Sheldrake on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly...873 bytes (82 words) - 03:22, 5 June 2023
- you may have been involved. The thread is Consensus by exhaustion at Rupert Sheldrake. Thank you. Mangoe (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC) The Arbitration...6 KB (647 words) - 19:01, 30 November 2013
- be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rupert Sheldrake. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively...1 KB (173 words) - 19:24, 6 August 2013
- WRONG: the authorship is listed as "08 July 2009 by Lewis Wolpert and Rupert Sheldrake". HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC) The following is a section...6 KB (798 words) - 07:45, 16 July 2021
- Hello! I noticed your contributions to Talk:Rupert_Sheldrake#Shameful_Article and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it...2 KB (168 words) - 23:33, 9 May 2021
- think this is something that all sides can accept. Paragraph 1: Alfred Rupert Sheldrake (born 28 June 1942) is a British biologist and author, most notable...5 KB (740 words) - 16:08, 7 October 2013
- II talk 17:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC) A tag has been placed on Talk:Rupert Sheldrake/Archive index requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia...8 KB (741 words) - 06:32, 6 December 2023
- to more accurately reflect the field. That is all. Dean Radin and Rupert Sheldrake have posted articles on this issue as shown below: 1) https://noetic...1 KB (196 words) - 18:28, 30 November 2021
- the inability of pure science to answer many fundamental questions. Rupert Sheldrake's concepts on the interconnection of the Universe is plainly a philosophical...1 KB (223 words) - 17:17, 4 October 2013
- refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rupert Sheldrake. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted....2 KB (247 words) - 11:28, 6 September 2021
- confusing. I created an account because of the controversy on the Rupert sheldrake article. I wanted to lend a voice to the page and want to be neutral...7 KB (999 words) - 19:44, 28 October 2013
- Quotes from WikiquoteI have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Rupert sheldrake, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions