Police brutality is the use of excessive and/or unnecessary force by personnel affiliated with law enforcement duties when dealing with suspects and civilians. The term is also applied to abuses by corrections personnel in municipal, state, and federal penal facilities, including military prisons. Highly publicized incidents of police misconduct have adverse effects, both on the victims and on the public perception of the implicated police departments.
The term police brutality is usually applied in the context of causing physical harm to a person. It may also involve psychological harm through the use of intimidation tactics beyond the scope of officially sanctioned police procedure. From the 18th-20th centuries, those who engaged in police brutality may have acted with the implicit approval of the local legal system, such as during the Civil Rights Movement era. In the contemporary era, individuals who engage in police brutality may do so with the tacit approval of their superiors or they may be rogue officers. In either case, they may perpetrate their actions under color of law and, more often than not, engage in a subsequent cover-up of their illegal activity.
The rate, magnitude, and impact of police brutality in the United States has not been properly documented or investigated.[1] The federal government attempted tracking the number of people killed in interactions with US police, but the program was defunded.[2] In 2006, a law was passed to require reporting of homicides at the hands of the police, but many police departments do not follow such rules. Some journalists have attempted to estimate potential numbers; research conducted by the Guardian and Washington Post found documentation of 1,080 deaths at the hands of he police in 2016, 991 deaths in 2015, and 1,1000 deaths in 2014. However, this data was only based on data that was available to them.[3]
Since the 20th century, there have been many public, private, and community efforts to combat police corruption and brutality. These efforts have identified various core issues that contribute to police brutality, including the insular culture of police departments (including the Blue wall of silence), the aggressive defense of police officers and resistance to change in police unions,[4] the broad legal protections granted to police officers (such as qualified immunity), the historic racism of police departments, the militarization of the police, the adoption of tactics that escalate tension (such as zero tolerance policing and stop-and-frisk), the inadequacies of police training and/or police academies, and the psychology of possessing absolute power.[5][6][7][8] The US legal doctrine of qualified immunity has been widely criticized as "[having] become a nearly failsafe tool to let police brutality go unpunished and deny victims their constitutional rights," as summarized in a 2020 Reuters report.[9]
Regarding solutions, activists and advocates have taken different approaches. Those who advocate for police reform offer specific suggestions to combat police brutality, such as body cameras, civilian review boards, improved police training, demilitarization of police forces,[10] and legislation aimed at reducing brutality (such as the Justice in Policing Act of 2020). Those who advocate to defund the police call for the full or partial diversion of funds allocated to police departments, which would be redirected toward community and social services.[11] Those who advocate to dismantle the police call for police departments to be dismantled and rebuilt from the ground up. Those who advocate to abolish police departments call for police departments to be disbanded entirely and to be replaced by other community and social services.[12][13]
History
Slave patrols roots
Some of the earliest roots of American policing, particularly in the Southern United States, can be found in slave patrols. Beginning in the 18th century, white volunteers developed slave patrols (also known as "paddyrollers"), which were squadrons that acted as vigilantes. [14] In 1704, the first slave patrol was established in South Carolina.[15] Eventually, all states with legal slavery had slave patrols, and they functioned as the first publicly funded police force in the South.[16] These patrols focused on enforcing discipline and policing of African-American slaves. They captured and returned fugitive slaves, quashed slave rebellions, terrorized slaves in order to prevent rebellions (including beatings and[14][17] searches of slave lodges), broke up slave meetings, and kept slaves off of roadways.[16] The patrols also administered discipline of indentured servants.[16] The patrols had broad influence and powers; they could forcefully enter all people's homes, if there was any suspicion of sheltering fugitive slaves.[14] During the American Civil War, slave patrols remained in place. After the Civil War, in the Reconstruction period, the former slave patrol groups joined with other white militias and groups, such as the Klu Klux Klan. Meanwhile, early police forces of the South began to take on the role of policing and regulating the movement of African-Americans who had gained their freedom. New laws were put in place to restrict their rights, which were known as Black Codes.[14] According to some historians, the transition from slave patrols to police forces in the South was a seamless one.[16]
Early police departments
In the 1838, the United States developed its first formal police department in Boston. This was followed by New York City (1845), Albany, New York (1851), Chicago (1851), New Orleans (1853), Cincinnati (1853), Philadelphia (1855), Newark, New Jersey (1857), Baltimore (1857). By the 1880s, all major US cities had police departments.[18] As written by Dr. Garry Potter, "Early American police departments shared two primary characteristics: they were notoriously corrupt and flagrantly brutal. This should come as no surprise in that police were under the control of local politicians."[19] The local political ward leader, who was often a tavern owner or gang leader, would appoint the chief of police of a neighborhood. The chief would be expected to follow the orders and expectations of the ward leader, which often included intimidating voters, harassing political opponents, and ensuring that the ward's business interests remain intact.[20] The police officers typically had little qualifications or training as law enforcement officers, and they often took bribes and kickbacks. If conflicts arose, it was common for police officers to use force and brutality.[21]
In the 19th century, police brutality was often directed at European immigrant communities,[20] particularly those from Ireland, Italy, Germany, and Eastern Europe.[22] The different cultures of these communities were often framed as "dangerous," which called for the enforcement of law and order.[20] For example, Irish immigrants were considered a "dangerous" class, and they experienced discrimination by nativists.[23] Meanwhile, organized crime and political parties were often intertwined, and police typically cast a blind eye toward gambling and prostitution, if managed by politically influential figures.[24]
Strike breaking
After the Civil War, industrialization and urbanization grew rapidly in the United States. This was accompanied by a rising organized labor movement, in which workers formed unions and joined in organized actions, such as strikes. Between 1880-1900, New York City had 5,090 strikes and Chicago had 1,737 strikes. The economic elites of the era typically characterized these strikes as "riots," and they encouraged the police to break the strikes. Consequently, the police broke up strikes through two primary methods: extreme violence and making "public order" arrests at a mass scale.[25]
Jim Crow South
By the late 19th century, local and state governments began to pass Jim Crow laws. These laws enforced strict racial segregation in schools, parks, neighborhoods, restaurants, and other public places.[26] This era saw a rise in lynchings and mob murders of African-Americans, with the police not arresting the perpetrators.[14] It was estimated that "at least one-half of the lynchings are carried out with police officers participating, and that in nine-tenths of the others the officers either condone or wink at the mob action," as reported by Arthur F. Rapper in 1933.[27] Meanwhile, African-Americans suffered police brutality, such as the 1946 beating of Isaac Woodward in Batesburg, South Carolina.[28] Due to the brutality of Jim Crowe laws, many African-Americans fled to Northern cities, where they experienced police brutality, as well.[20]
Professionalization of police
During Prohibition (1919-33), the problem of police corruption was only worsened. Police officers were commonly bribed so that bootlegging and speakeasies could continue, in addition to the flourishing organized crime underworlds of cities such as Chicago, New York City, and Philadelphia.[29] Some police officers became employed by organized crime syndicates, and they helped perform duties, such as harassment and intimidation of rivals.[30] Consequently, President Herbert Hoover established the Wickersham Commission in1929, which was tasked with investigating law enforcement in the country. The result was the beginning of a new era in law enforcement in the United States, which aimed to professionalize and reform the industry. It was decided that police should function separately from political wards or leaders, and police precincts were altered to no longer overlap with political wards.[22] Police departments became more bureaucratic with a clear chain of command. New practices were put into place to recruit, train, and reward police officers. However, these changes were not welcomed by all community members. Police departments adopted tactics that often antagonized people, such as aggressive stop and frisk.[31] Police departments also became increasingly insular and "isolated from public life" as a result of these changes, according to crime historian Samuel Walker. For these reasons, among other reasons, they were particularly unequipped to handle the cultural and social upheaval of the 1960s.[22]
Civil Rights Movement era
The Civil Rights Movement was the target of numerous incidents of police brutality in its struggle for justice and racial equality, notably during the Birmingham campaign of 1963–64 and during the Selma to Montgomery marches of 1965. Media coverage of the brutality sparked national outrage, and public sympathy for the movement grew rapidly as a result. Martin Luther King Jr. criticized police brutality in his speeches. Furthermore, the period was marked by riots in response to police violence against African-Americans and Latinos, including the Harlem riot of 1964, 1964 Philadelphia race riot, Watts riots (1965), Division Street riots (1966), and 1967 Detroit riot.[32] In 1966, the Black Panther Party was formed by Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale, in order to challenge police brutality against African-Americans from disproportionately white police departments.[33][34] The conflict between the Black Panther Party and various police departments often resulted in violence with the deaths of 34 members of the Black Panther Party[35] and 15 police officers.[36]
The Civil Rights Movement was also targeted by the FBI in a program called COINTELPRO (1956-71). Under this program, the FBI would use undercover agents to create violence and chaos within political groups, such as the Socialist Worker's Party and Black Panther Party.[37] The police would harm organizers and assassinate Black Panther leaders like Mark Clark and Fred Hampton, both of whom were killed in a 1969 FBI raid in Chicago.[38]
In the United States, race and accusations of police brutality continue to be closely linked, and the phenomenon has sparked a string of race riots over the years. Especially notable among these incidents was the uprising caused by the arrest and beating of Rodney King on March 3, 1991, by officers of the Los Angeles Police Department. The atmosphere was particularly volatile because the brutality had been videotaped by a civilian and widely broadcast afterwards. When the four law enforcement officers charged with assault and other violations were acquitted, the 1992 Los Angeles Riots broke out.
Anti-war demonstrations
During the Vietnam War, anti-war demonstrations were sometimes quelled through the use of billy clubs and tear gas. In 1967, student protesters experienced violent confrontations with police during a sit-in protest of Dow Chemical producing napalm.[39] The most notorious of these assaults took place during the August 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Some rogue police officers took off their badges, in order to escape identification, and brutally assaulted protesters. Journalists were assaulted inside the convention hall.[40] The actions of the police were later described as a "police riot" in the Walker Report to the U.S. National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence.[41] On May 15, 1969, police opened fire on protesters in People's Park in Berkeley, California, which resulted in serious injuries for some protesters.[42]
War on drugs
In June 1971, President Richard M. Nixon declared a War on Drugs. This new "war" brought in stricter policing and criminal laws, including no-knock warrants and mandatory sentencing. As was the case with Prohibition, the War on Drugs was marked by increased police misconduct. War on drugs policing - notably stop and frisk and Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams - contributed to police brutality, especially targeting minority communities.[43] Years later, Nixon aide John Ehrlichman, explained: "The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people... We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either... but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news."[44]
The war on drugs has been seen as responsible for police misconduct towards African-Americans and Latinos. While white people and African-Americans both use and sell drugs at roughly similar rates, African-Americans are over six times as likely to be incarcerated for drug-related charges, according to 2015 data.[45][38] Specifically, the use of stop and frisk tactics by police have targeted African-Americans and Latinos. In looking at data from New York in the early 2000s up to 2014, people who had committed no offense made up 82% to 90% of those who were stopped and frisked. Of those people stopped, only 9% to 12% were white. People who were stopped felt that they had experienced psychological violence, and the police sometimes used insults against them. Stop and frisk tactics caused people to experience anxiety about leaving their homes, due to fears of police harassment and abuse.[43]
With the militarization of the police, SWAT teams have been used more frequently in drug possession situations.[6] SWAT teams can be armed with weapons like diversionary grenades. In cases where SWAT teams were used, only 35% of the time were drugs found in peoples' homes. African-Americans and Latinos are disproportionately the targets of these raids,[43] and according to the ACLU, "Sending a heavily armed team of officers to perform 'normal' police work can dangerously escalate situations that need never have involved violence."[46]
Post 9/11
After the attacks of September 11, 2001, human rights observers raised concerns about increased police brutality in the U.S. An extensive report prepared for the United Nations Human Rights Committee, published in 2006, stated that in the U.S. the War on Terror "created a generalized climate of impunity for law enforcement officers, and contributed to the erosion of what few accountability mechanisms exist for civilian control over law enforcement agencies. As a result, police brutality and abuse persist unabated and undeterred across the country."[47] During the "war on terror," there has been noted increases in enforcement power for officers. By 2007, discussion on the appropriateness of using racial profiling and force against people of color has decreased since 9/11.[47] Racial profiling specifically increased for those of South Asian, Arab, Middle Eastern, and Muslim origins.[47] An example of increased use of police use of force has been in the use of tasers. From 2001 to 2007, at least 150 deaths were attributed to tasers and many injuries occurred. People of color have been the main people who have been targeted the most with regards to increased taser use.[47]
A decision by the House and the Senate in Hawaii was expected in May 2014 after police agreed in March 2014 not to oppose the revision of a law that was implemented in the 1970s, allowing undercover police officers to engage in sexual relations with sex workers during the course of investigations. (A similar program in the United Kingdom resulted in physical and emotional abuse of victims, and children born without fathers when the undercover operation ended; see UK undercover policing relationships scandal). Following initial protest from supporters of the legislation, all objections were retracted on March 25, 2014. A Honolulu police spokeswoman informed Time magazine that, at the time of the court's decision, no reports had been made in regard to the abuse of the exemption by police, while a Hawaiian senator stated to journalists: "I suppose that in retrospect the police probably feel somewhat embarrassed about this whole situation." However, the Pacifica Alliance to Stop Slavery and other advocates affirmed their knowledge of police brutality in this area and explained that the fear of retribution is the main deterrent for sex workers who seek to report offending officers. At a Hawaiian Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, also in March 2014, an attorney testified that his client was raped three times by Hawaiian police before prostitution was cited as the reason for her subsequent arrest.[48]
Recent incidents
The prevalence of police brutality in the United States is not comprehensively documented, and the statistics on police brutality are much less available. The few statistics that exist include a 2006 Department of Justice report, which showed that out of 26,556 citizen complaints made in 2002 about excessive use of police force among large U.S. agencies (representing 5% of agencies and 59% of officers), about 2,000 were found to have merit.[49]
Other studies have shown that most police brutality goes unreported. In 1982, the federal government funded a "Police Services Study," in which over 12,000 randomly selected citizens were interviewed in three metropolitan areas. The study found that 13.6 percent of those surveyed claimed to have had cause to complain about police service (including verbal abuse, discourtesy and physical abuse) in the previous year. Yet only 30 percent of those filed formal complaints.[50] A 1998 Human Rights Watch report stated that in all 14 precincts it examined, the process of filing a complaint was "unnecessarily difficult and often intimidating."[51]
Statistics on the use of physical force by law enforcement are available. For example, an extensive U.S. Department of Justice report on police use of force released in 2001 indicated that in 1999, "approximately 422,000 people 16 years old and older were estimated to have had contact with police in which force or the threat of force was used."[52] Research shows that measures of the presence of black and Hispanic people and majority/minority income inequality are related positively to average annual civil rights criminal complaints.[53]
Police brutality can be associated with racial profiling. Differences in race, religion, politics, or socioeconomic status often exist between police and the citizenry. Some police officers may view the population (or a particular subset thereof) as generally deserving of punishment. Portions of the population may perceive the police to be oppressors. In addition, there is a perception that victims of police brutality often belong to relatively powerless groups, such as minorities, the disabled, and the poor.[54] According to a 2015 and 2016 project by The Guardian, more white people are killed by police in raw numbers than black people are, but after adjusting this finding based on the fact that the black population is smaller than the white population, twice as many black people are killed by police per capita than white people are, and black victims are more likely to be unarmed when they are killed than white victims are.[55][56] A 2019 study showed that people of color face a higher likelihood of being killed by police than white men and women do, that risk peaks in young adulthood, and men of color face a nontrivial lifetime risk of being killed by police.[57][58]
Race was suspected to play a role in the shooting of Michael Brown in 2014. Brown was an unarmed 18-year-old African American who was shot by Darren Wilson, a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. The predominately black city erupted after the shooting. Riots following the shooting generated much debate about the treatment of African-Americans by law enforcement.
Recent Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch reports have found that prison guard brutality is common in the U.S. A 2006 Human Rights Watch report revealed that five state prison systems permit the use of aggressive, unmuzzled dogs on prisoners as part of cell removal procedures.[59]
In May 2020, the issue of police brutality saw a surge in public response following the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Related protests occurred nationwide and internationally beginning in Minneapolis, Minnesota on May 26, 2020. In 2016, Tony Timpa was killed in the same way in Dallas.[60]
Investigation
In the United States, investigation of cases of police brutality has often been left to internal police commissions and/or district attorneys (DAs). Internal police commissions have often been criticized for a lack of accountability and for bias favoring officers, as they frequently declare upon review that the officer(s) acted within the department's rules, or according to their training. For instance, an April 2007 study of the Chicago Police Department found that out of more than 10,000 police abuse complaints filed between 2002 and 2003, only 19 (0.19%) resulted in meaningful disciplinary action. The study charges that the police department's oversight body allows officers with "criminal tendencies to operate with impunity," and argues that the Chicago Police Department should not be allowed to police itself.[61]
Investigations can be conducted by civilian complaint review board (CCRB), which act as an independent agency that can investigate, conduct hearings, and make recommendations in response to complaints of police brutality.[62] However, only 19% of large municipal police forces have a CCRB, such as the Civilian Complaint Review Board (New York City), Civilian Office of Police Accountability (Chicago), Citizen Police Review Board (Pittsburgh), and Police Review Commission (Berkeley).[63] Law enforcement jurisdictions that have a CCRB have an excessive force complaint rate against their officers of 11.9% verses 6.6% complaint rate for those without a CCRB. Of those forces without a CCRB, only 8% of the complaints were sustained.[64] Thus, for the year 2002, the rate at which police brutality complaints were sustained was 0.53% for the larger police municipalities nationwide.
The ability of district attorneys to investigate police brutality has also been called into question, as DAs depend on help from police departments to bring cases to trial. It was only in the 1990s that serious efforts began to transcend the difficulties of dealing with systemic patterns of police misconduct.
Beyond police departments and DAs, mechanisms of government oversight have gradually evolved. The Rodney King case triggered the creation of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, informally known as the Christopher Commission, in 1991. The commission, mandated to investigate the practices of the LAPD, uncovered disturbing patterns of misconduct and abuse, but the reforms it recommended were put on hold. Meanwhile, media reports revealed a frustration in dealing with systemic abuse in other jurisdictions as well, such as New York and Pittsburgh. Selwyn Raab of the New York Times wrote about how the "Blue Code of Silence among police officers helped to conceal even the most outrageous examples of misconduct."[67]
Within this climate, the police misconduct provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 was created, which authorized the Attorney General to "file lawsuits seeking court orders to reform police departments engaging in a pattern or practice of violating citizens' federal rights."[68] As of January 31, 2003, the Department of Justice has used this provision to negotiate reforms in twelve jurisdictions across the U.S. (Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, Steubenville Police Department, New Jersey State Police, Los Angeles Police Department, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, Highland Park, Illinois Police Department, Cincinnati Police Department, Columbus Police Department, Buffalo Police Department, Mount Prospect, Illinois Police Department, Seattle Police Department, and the Montgomery County, Maryland Police Department).[69]
Data obtained by The Associated Press in 2016 showed a racial disparity in officers' use of stun guns.[70]
Causes
Numerous doctrines, such as federalism, separation of powers, causation, deference, discretion, and burden of proof have been cited as partial explanations for the judiciaries' fragmented pursuit of police misconduct. However, there is also evidence that courts cannot or choose not to see systemic patterns in police brutality.[71] Other factors that have been cited as encouraging police brutality include institutionalized systems of police training, management, and culture; a criminal-justice system that discourages prosecutors from pursuing police misconduct vigorously; a political system that responds more readily to police than to the residents of inner-city and minority communities; and a political culture that fears crime and values tough policing more than it values due process for all its citizens.[72] It is believed that without substantial social change, the control of police deviance is improbable at best.[73]
In the United States, the passage of the Volstead Act (popularly known as the National Prohibition Act) in 1919 had a long-term negative impact on policing practices. By the mid-1920s, crime was growing dramatically in response to the demand for illegal alcohol. Many law enforcement agencies stepped up the use of unlawful practices. By the time of the Hoover administration (1929–1933), the issue had risen to national concern and a National Committee on Law Observation and Enforcement (popularly known as the Wickersham Commission) was formed to look into the situation.[74] The resulting "Report on Lawlessness in Law Enforcement" (1931) concluded that "[t]he third degree—that is, the use of physical brutality, or other forms of cruelty, to obtain involuntary confessions or admissions—is widespread."[75] In the years following the report, landmark legal judgments such as Brown v. Mississippi helped cement a legal obligation to respect the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[76]
Police brutality can be associated with racial profiling. Differences in race, religion, politics, ability, or socioeconomic status sometimes exist between police and the citizenry. Some police officers may view the population (or a particular subset thereof) as generally deserving punishment. Portions of the population may perceive the police to be oppressors.[77] In addition, there is a perception that victims of police brutality often belong to relatively powerless groups, such as racial or cultural minorities, the disabled, and the poor.[54]
The war model of policing has been offered as a reason for why police brutality occurs. Through this model, police brutality is more likely to occur because police see crime as a war and have people who are their enemies.[78] Police who have been exposed to war have more than a 50% higher rate of excessive force complaints than non-veterans according to internal Boston PD documents.[79]
Academic theories such as the threat hypothesis and the community violence hypothesis have been used to explain police brutality. The threat hypothesis implies that "police use force in direct response to a perceived threat from racial and/or economic groups viewed as threatening to the existing social order."[80] According to the community violence hypothesis, "police use force in direct response to levels of violence in the community."[80] This theory explains that force is used to control groups that threaten the community or police themselves with violence.
Solutions
Body cameras
Many policies have been offered for how to prevent police brutality. One proposed solution is body worn cameras. The theory of using body cameras is that police officers will be less likely to commit misconduct if they understand that their actions are being recorded.[81] The United States Department of Justice under Obama's administration supplied $20 million for body cameras to be implemented in police departments.[82] During a case study attempting to test the effects that body cameras had on police actions, researchers found evidence that suggested that police used less force with civilians when they had body cameras.[81]
Police are supposed to have the cameras on from the time they receive a call of an incident to when the entire encounter is over.[83] However, there is controversy regarding police using the equipment properly.[84] The issue regarding an officer's ability to turn on and off the record button is if the police officer is trustworthy. In 2017, Baltimore Police Officer Richard A. Pinheiro Jr. was caught planting evidence. The officer did not realize 30 seconds of footage was available even before switching the camera on.[85] To solve this problem, it has been proposed to record police officers' entire shift and not allowing access for police officers to turn on and off the record button. This can cause technical and cost issues due to the large amount of data the camera would accumulate, for which various solutions have been proposed.[86][87][88][89]
According to a survey done by Vocativ in 2014, "41 cities use body cams on some of their officers, 25 have plans to implement body cams and 30 cities do not use or plan to use cams at this time."[84] There are other issues that can occur from the use of body cameras as well. This includes downloading and maintenance of the data which can be expensive. There is also some worry that if video testimony becomes more relied upon in court cases, not having video evidence from body cameras would decrease the likelihood that the court system believes credible testimony from police officers and witnesses[81]
Civilian review boards
Civilian review boards have been proposed as another solution to decreasing police brutality. Benefits of civilian review boards can include making sure police are doing their jobs and increasing the relationship the police have with the public.[90] Civilian review boards have gotten criticism though. They can be staffed with police who can weaken the effectiveness of the boards. Some boards do not have the authority to order investigations into police departments. They can also lack the funding to be an effective tool.[90]
Lawsuits and qualified immunity
Excessive use of force is a tort, and police officers may be held liable for damages should they take unconstitutional actions.[91] The ability to sue in federal court was first introduced as a remedy for police brutality and misconduct in 1871 during the Reconstruction era as the Third Enforcement Act. The act allowed plaintiffs to sue directly in federal courts which was important as it allowed plaintiffs to bypass state courts during the Jim Crow era. The theory behind this solution to police brutality is that by taking the civil action to a federal court level, the case will be heard fairly and the financial judgments are intended to have a deterrent effect on future police misconduct in that department.[92]
Since 1967, this remedy has been restricted by Supreme Court precedents through qualified immunity which grants police officers immunity from lawsuits unless their actions violated "clearly established" law.[93] In practice, most jurisdictions rely on court precedent to define clearly established law, so to be successful plaintiffs often must show that a previous court case found the particular act at hand unlawful.[94]: 45–4 For example, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals granted immunity to an officer who shot a 14-year-old who dropped a BB gun as he raised his hands, because unlike a 2011 case where an officer was held liable for shooting a man who lowered a shotgun, the boy had pulled the BB gun from his waistband.[95][96] This is often a stringent requirement, and in a majority of cases since 2005, police officer have been granted immunity for their actions.[95] Lawsuits are sometimes successful, however. For example in a 2001 settlement, New York City was required to pay a plaintiff $7.125 million in damages and the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association was required to pay $1.625 million. At that time, it was the most money the city had ever paid to settle a police brutality lawsuit and is considered the first time that a police union has paid a claim to settle a brutality suit.[97]
Redirecting funds to other departments (defund the police)
After the Killing of George Floyd in 2020, there have been widespread calls to defund the police.[98][99] The idea behind this is that money is diverted from policing to the areas needed to prevent crime, for example, housing, employment, welfare, etc.[98] There have been calls for this since society has seen a lack of reform in policing around police brutality and discrimination.
Public reaction
A 2001 publication noted that local media rarely reported scandals involving out-of-town police unless events made it onto a network videotape.[100] According to a 2002 analysis, there is often a dramatic increase in unfavorable attitudes toward the police in the wake of highly publicized events such as the Rampart scandal in the late 1990s and the killings of Amadou Diallo (February 1999) and Patrick Dorismond (March 2000) in New York City.[101] Experiments have found that when viewers are shown footage of police arrests, they may be more likely to perceive the police conduct as brutal if the arresting officers are Caucasian.[102]
Public opinion polls following the 1991 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles and the 1992 killing of Malice Green in Detroit indicate that the incidents appear to have had their greatest effect on specific perceptions of the way local police treat black people, and markedly less effect on broader perceptions of the extent of discrimination against them.[103]
To draw attention to the issue of police brutality in America, multiple basketball players for the NBA, including Kyrie Irving and LeBron James, wore shirts labeled "I Can't Breathe," referring to the death of Eric Garner at the hands of the New York City Police Department on July 17, 2014.[104] Concerned African-Americans also started a movement referred to as "Black Lives Matter" to try to help people understand how police are affecting African-American lives, initially prompted by the 2013 acquittal of George Zimmerman of the 2012 shooting of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida, and further sparked by the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 9, 2014.[105][106] In a related action, Colin Kaepernick, a quarterback then playing for the San Francisco 49ers, started a protest movement by refusing to stand for the national anthem at the start of games,[107][108] receiving widespread support and widespread condemnation, including from President Donald Trump.[109]
In May and June 2020, support for the Black Lives Matter movement surged among Americans as a result of the protests and unrest that broke out across the United States following the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. A tracking poll by Civiqs found that, for the first time ever, more white Americans supported the Black Lives Matter movement than opposed it.[110]
While many celebrities have joined in on the "Black Lives Matter" campaign, many of the initiatives occurring in communities across the country are led by local members of the Black Lives Matter Global Network. The purpose of this network is to demand change at the local level and stop unfair punishment or brutality towards Black communities.[111] The group has 22 chapters in many major cities across the United States.
Legal and institutional controls
Responsibility for investigating police misconduct has mainly fallen on local and state governments. The federal government does investigate misconduct but only does so when local and state governments fail to look into cases of misconduct.[112]
Laws intended to protect against police abuse of authority include the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures; the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects individuals against self-incrimination and being deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process; the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which bans cruel and unusual punishments; the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which includes the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses; the Civil Rights Act of 1871; and the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Civil Rights Act has evolved into a key U.S. law in brutality cases. However, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 has been assessed as ultimately ineffective in deterring police brutality.[113] The federal government can place charges on police officers who commit police misconduct. These prosecutions do not often occur as the federal government tends to defer to local and state governments for prosecution.[112] The federal government also has the ability to investigate police departments if they are committing unlawful actions. When an investigation reveals violations by a police department, the Department of Justice can use §14141[114] to file a lawsuit. Like other tools at their disposal, the federal government also rarely uses this statute.[112] In a 1996 law journal article, it was argued that Judges often give police convicted of brutality light sentences on the grounds that they have already been punished by damage to their careers.[115] A 1999 article attributed much of this difficulty in combating police brutality to the overwhelming power of the stories mainstream American culture tells about the encounters leading to police violence.[116]
In 1978, surveys of police officers found that police brutality, along with sleeping on duty, was viewed as one of the most common and least likely to be reported forms of police deviance other than corruption.[117]
In Tennessee v. Garner (1985), the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment prevents police from using deadly force on a fleeing suspect unless the police has good reason to believe that the suspect is a danger to others.[118]
The Supreme Court in Graham v. Connor (1989) stated that the reasonableness of a police officer using force should be based off what the officer's viewpoint was when the crime occurred. Reasonableness should also factor in things like the suspect's threat level and if attempts were made to avoid being arrested.[119]
In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court introduced the legal doctrine of qualified immunity, originally with the rationale of protecting law enforcement officials from frivolous lawsuits and financial liability in cases where they acted in good faith in an unclear legal situation.[120][9] Starting in around 2005, courts increasingly applied this doctrine to cases involving use of excessive force, eventually leading to widespread criticism that it "has become a nearly failsafe tool to let police brutality go unpunished and deny victims their constitutional rights" (as summarized in a 2020 Reuters report).[9]
In art
In July 2019, the Glimmerglass Festival in Cooperstown, New York premiered Jeanine Tesori and Tazewell Thompson′s opera Blue about African-American teenagers as an ′endangered species′; often falling victim to police brutality.[121]
See also
- Black Lives Matter
- Gypsy cop
- Human rights in the United States
- List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States
- Militarization of police
- Photography is Not a Crime
- Pitchess motion
- Police abolition
- Police brutality against Native Americans
- Police misconduct § United States
- Police riots in the United States
- Proactive policing
- Rough ride
- Torture in the United States § Domestic police and prisons
References
- ^ Weitzer, Ronald (September–October 2002). "Incidents of police misconduct and public opinion". Journal of Criminal Justice. 30 (5): 397–408. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00150-2.
- ^ March 18, 2015. The uncounted: why the US can't keep track of people killed by police. Archived 2019-09-11 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian.
- ^ Vitale, Alex S. (2017). The End of Policing. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books. ISBN 978-1-78478-289-4.
- ^ Scheiber, Noam; Stockman, Farah; Goodman, J. David (June 6, 2020). "How Police Unions Became Such Powerful Opponents to Reform Efforts". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
- ^ William A. Geller; Toch, Hans (1996). Police Violence: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force. Yale University Press.
- ^ a b "Police militarization fails to protect officers and targets black communities, study finds". PBS NewsHour. August 21, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ Lantigua-Williams, Juleyka (July 13, 2016). "How Much Can Better Training Do to Improve Policing?". The Atlantic. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "Why So Many Police Are Handling the Protests Wrong". The Marshall Project. June 1, 2020. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ a b c "Special Report: For cops who kill, special Supreme Court protection". Reuters. May 30, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2020.
- ^ "Solutions". Campaign Zero. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ Searcey, Dionne (June 8, 2020). "What Would Efforts to Defund or Disband Police Departments Really Mean?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
- ^ Andrew, Scottie. "There's a growing call to defund the police. Here's what it means". CNN. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "Calls to reform, defund, dismantle and abolish the police, explained". NBC News. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
- ^ a b c d e Hassett-Walker, Connie. "The history of police brutality in the US goes back to slave patrols of the 1700s". The Conversation. Retrieved June 7, 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "A Brief History of Slavery and the Origins of American Policing | Police Studies Online". plsonline.eku.edu. Retrieved June 7, 2020.
- ^ a b c d "The History of the Police" (PDF).
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Slave Patrols and the Origins of Policing". Ella Baker Center. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
- ^ "The History Of Policing In The United States, Part 1 | Police Studies Online | Eastern Kentucky University". plsonline.eku.edu. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
- ^ "The History of Policing in the United States, Part 2 | Police Studies Online". plsonline.eku.edu. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
- ^ a b c d Nodjimbadem, Katie. "The Long, Painful History of Police Brutality in the U.S." Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "The History of Policing in the United States, Part 2 | Police Studies Online". plsonline.eku.edu. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
- ^ a b c "How the U.S. Got Its Police Force". Time. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ Gershon, Livia. "How Stereotypes of the Irish Evolved From 'Criminals' to Cops". HISTORY. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "The History of Policing in the United States, Part 4 | Police Studies Online". plsonline.eku.edu. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "The History of Policing in the United States, Part 3".
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Editors, History com. "Jim Crow Laws". HISTORY. Retrieved June 7, 2020.
{{cite web}}
:|last=
has generic name (help) - ^ "What was Jim Crow - Jim Crow Museum - Ferris State University". www.ferris.edu. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
- ^ "The Police Beating That Opened America's Eyes to Jim Crow's Brutality". Snopes.com. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
- ^ "Prohibition: Unintended Consequences | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "The History of Policing in the United States, Part 4 | Police Studies Online". plsonline.eku.edu. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "The History of Policing in the United States, Part 5 | Police Studies Online". plsonline.eku.edu. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ BlackPast. "Racial Violence in the United States Since 1660 •". Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ The Black Panthers by Jessica McElrath, published as a part of afroamhistory.about.com Archived April 7, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, accessed on December 17, 2005.
- ^ Editors, History com. "Black Panthers". HISTORY. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
{{cite web}}
:|last=
has generic name (help) - ^ from an interview with Kathleen Cleaver on May 7, 2002, published by the PBS program P.O.V. and being published in Introduction to Black Panther 1968: Photographs by Ruth-Marion Baruch and Pirkle Jones, (Greybull Press). [1] Archived 2009-04-22 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ The Officer Down Memorial Archived 2007-10-13 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "COINTELPRO". FBI. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ a b Nelson, Jill (2000). Police Brutality: An Anthology. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
- ^ "Protests and Backlash | American Experience | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "News Analysis: Racism, unrest, police brutality. Is America living 1968 all over again? Yes, and no". Los Angeles Times. June 4, 2020. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ Walker, Daniel (1968). Johnson (ed.). Rights in Conflict: The violent confrontation of demonstrators and police in the parks and streets of Chicago during the week of the Democratic National Convention of 1968. A report submitted by Daniel Walker, director of the Chicago Study Team, to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. Braceland Brothers. p. 233.
- ^ Bingham, Clara (July 6, 2019). "The Battle for People's Park, Berkeley 1969: when Vietnam came home". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ a b c Cooper, Hannah LF (2015). "War on Drugs Policing and Police Brutality". Substance Use & Misuse. 50 (8–9): 1188–1194. doi:10.3109/10826084.2015.1007669. ISSN 1082-6084. PMC 4800748. PMID 25775311.
- ^ "A Brief History of the Drug War". Drug Policy Alliance. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "Rates of Drug Use and Sales, by Race; Rates of Drug Related Criminal Justice Measures, by Race | The Hamilton Project". www.hamiltonproject.org. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "Police Militarization". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ a b c d Ritchie, Andrea; Mogul, Joey (December 2007). "In the Shadows of the War on Terror: Persistent Police Brutality and Abuse in the United States" (PDF). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 26, 2017.
- ^ Dockterman, Eliana (March 26, 2014). "Hawaii Police Won't Get to Have Sex With Prostitutes Anymore". Time. Archived from the original on April 5, 2014. Retrieved April 5, 2014.
- ^ Hickman, Matthew (June 26, 2006). "Citizen Complaints about Police Use of Force". Bureau of Justice Statistics. Archived from the original on August 8, 2007. Retrieved August 27, 2007.
- ^ "Fighting Police Abuse: A Community Action Manual". American Civil Liberties Union. December 1, 1997. Archived from the original on October 19, 2009. Retrieved August 6, 2007.
- ^ "Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States". Human Rights Watch. June 1998. Archived from the original on August 18, 2007. Retrieved August 8, 2007.
- ^ "Contacts between Police and the Public: Findings from the 1999 National Survey". Bureau of Justice Statistics. March 21, 2001. Archived from the original on August 8, 2007. Retrieved August 27, 2007.
- ^ Holmes, Malcolm D. (2000), Minority Threat and Police Brutality: Determinants of Civil Rights Criminal Complaints in U.S. Municipalities, vol. 38, Criminology, p. 343, archived from the original on April 27, 2014, retrieved May 31, 2020
- ^ a b Powers, Mary D. (1995). "Civilian Oversight Is Necessary to Prevent Police Brutality". In Winters, Paul A. (ed.). Policing the Police. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. pp. 56–60. ISBN 1-56510-262-2.
- ^ "The Counted: People killed by police in the US". The Guardian.
- ^ Swaine, John; Laughland, Oliver; Lartey, Jamiles; McCarthy, Ciara (December 31, 2015). "Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths". The Guardian. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
- ^ Edwards, Frank; Lee, Hedwig; Esposito, Michael. "Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. PNAS. Archived from the original on April 22, 2020. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
- ^ Reiss Albert J (July 1968), "Police brutality-answers to key questions", Society, 5 (8), Springer New York: 10–19, doi:10.1007/BF02804717, ISSN 0147-2011
- ^ "Cruel and Degrading: The Use of Dogs for Cell Extractions in U.S. Prisons". Human Rights Watch. 2006. Archived from the original on July 7, 2007. Retrieved August 8, 2007.
- ^ "'This Rage That You Hear Is Real': On the Ground at the Dallas Protests". D Magazine. June 1, 2020.
- ^ Gallagher, Ryan (April 4, 2007). "Study: Police abuse goes unpunished". Medill School, Northwestern University, Alabama. Archived from the original on June 3, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
- ^ "About - CCRB". www1.nyc.gov. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ "Police Oversight by Jurisdiction (USA)". National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
- ^ U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. "Citizen Complaints about Police Use of Force". Archived from the original on August 12, 2007. Retrieved February 18, 2013.
- ^ Scumbag T-Shirt Raises Money For Police Youth Program Archived 2008-11-02 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Suit against top cop cites "Scumbag" T-shirt". Archived from the original on March 26, 2010. Retrieved August 13, 2010.
- ^ Raab, Selwyn (May 2, 1993). "The Dark Blue Code of Silence". New York Times. Archived from the original on April 10, 2009. Retrieved August 27, 2007.
- ^ Civil Rights Division (August 16, 2007). "Conduct of Law Enforcement Agencies". U.S. Department of Justice. Archived from the original on August 7, 2007. Retrieved August 27, 2007.
- ^ Civil Rights Division (January 1, 2003). "Department of Justice Police Misconduct Pattern or Practice Program". U.S. Department of Justice. Archived from the original on December 25, 2007. Retrieved August 27, 2007.
- ^ Collins, Dave (January 27, 2016). "APNewsBreak: Racial Disparities in Connecticut Stun Gun Use". ABC News. Archived from the original on January 27, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2016.
- ^ Bandes, Susan (1999), Patterns of Injustice: Police Brutality in the Courts, vol. 47, Buff. L. Rev., p. 1275
- ^ Regina G. Lawrence (November 6, 2000). The politics of force: media and the construction of police brutality. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-22192-5.
- ^ Victor E. Kappeler; Richard D. Sluder; Geoffrey P. Alpert (1998). Forces of Deviance: Understanding the Dark Side of Policing, Second Edition. ISBN 0-88133-983-0. Archived from the original on October 14, 2006. Retrieved May 4, 2010.
- ^ "Wicker shambles". Time. February 2, 1931. Retrieved September 5, 2007.
- ^ University Publications of America (December 1997). "Records of the Wickersham Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement". LexisNexis. Retrieved September 5, 2007.
- ^ United States Supreme Court (February 17, 1936). "BROWN et al. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI". www.injusticeline.com. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved September 5, 2007.
- ^ Donelson, Raff (2017). "Blacks, Cops, and the State of Nature". Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. 15 (1): 183–192. SSRN 2941467.
- ^ Skolnick, Jerome; Fyfe, James (1993). Above the Law. New York: The Free Press.
- ^ "when some veterans become cops, some bring war home".
- ^ a b Smith, Brad W. (2003). "The Impact of Police Officer Diversity on Police-Caused Homicides". The Policy Studies Journal. 31 (2): 147–162. doi:10.1111/1541-0072.t01-1-00009. ProQuest 210572644.
- ^ a b c Arie, Barak; Farrar, William; Sutherland, Alex (September 2015). "The effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras On Use Of Force And Citizens' Complaints Against The Police" (PDF). Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 31 (3). Retrieved March 3, 2017.
- ^ Jackson, David (May 1, 2015). "Obama team will fund police body camera project". USA Today.
- ^ Layton, Julia (June 12, 2015). "How Police Body Cameras Work". How Stuff Works. Archived from the original on May 29, 2017.
- ^ a b Tracy, Abigail; Fox, EJ; Walsh, Ryan (November 15, 2014). "Is Your Police Force Wearing Body Cameras?". Vocativ. Archived from the original on May 16, 2017.
- ^ Fortin, Jacey (January 24, 2018). "Baltimore Police Officer Charged With Fabricating Evidence in Drug Case". New York Times. Archived from the original on January 20, 2020. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
- ^ Pasternack, Alex (March 3, 2017). "Police Body Cameras Will Do More Than Just Record You". Fast Company. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
- ^ Coldewey, Devin (April 5, 2017). "Taser rebrands as Axon and offers free body cameras to any police department". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
- ^ McManus, Scott (May 11, 2017). "The hidden challenge behind body cams-- storage". GCN. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
- ^ Hayduk, Ted (2016). "DEBUNKING THE MYTHS OF BODY CAMERA VIDEO STORAGE" (PDF). ECS Arrow.
- ^ a b "Is Civilian Oversight the Answer to Distrust of Police?". FRONTLINE. Archived from the original on March 7, 2017. Retrieved March 6, 2017.
- ^ 42 USC section 1983
- ^ Klan, Sina (June 3, 2020). "Supreme Court's key choice on police wrongdoing". CNN.
- ^ New York Times Editorial Board (May 29, 2020). "How the Supreme Court Lets Cops Get Away With Murder".
- ^ Finn, Tyler (2019). "Qualified Immunity Formalism: "Clearly established law" and the right to record police activity". Columbia Law Review. 119 (2). JSTOR 26651845.
- ^ a b Chung, Andrew; Hurley, Lawrence; Botts, Jackie; Januta, Andrea; Gomez, Guillermo (May 8, 2020). "For cops who kill, special Supreme Court protection". Reuters.
- ^ Nelson v. City of Battle Creek (6th Cir. February 26, 2020), Text.
- ^ "CITY SETTLES SUIT IN LOUIMA TORTURE". Archived from the original on July 10, 2018.
- ^ a b "What does 'defund the police' mean? The rallying cry sweeping the US – explained". June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Cities Ask if It's Time to Defund Police and 'Reimagine' Public Safety". June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Mcardle, Andrea; Erzen, Tanya (March 2001). Zero tolerance: quality of life and the new police brutality in New York City. NYU Press. ISBN 9780814756324.
- ^ Weitzer, Ronald (September–October 2002). "Incidents of police misconduct and public opinion". Journal of Criminal Justice. 30 (5): 397–408. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00150-2.
- ^ Levin, Jack; Alexander R. Thomas (September 1997). "Experimentally manipulating race: Perceptions of police brutality in an arrest: A research note". Justice Quarterly. 14 (3): 577–586. doi:10.1080/07418829700093481.
- ^ Sigelman, Lee; Welch, Susan; Bledsoe, Timothy; Combs, Michael (1997). "Police brutality and public perceptions of racial discrimination: A tale of two beatings". Political Research Quarterly. 50 (4): 777–791. doi:10.1177/106591299705000403.
- ^ Mahoney, Brian (December 8, 2014). "Irving, LeBron wear 'I Can't Breathe' shirts". National Basketball Association. Archived from the original on December 9, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2017 – via Associated Press.
- ^ Luibrand, Shannon (August 7, 2015). "How a death in Ferguson sparked a movement in America". CBS News. Archived from the original on August 8, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2017.
- ^ Day, Elizabeth (July 19, 2015). "#BlackLivesMatter: the birth of a new civil rights movement". The Observer. Archived from the original on July 19, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2017.
- ^ Sandritter, Mark (September 11, 2017). "A timeline of Colin Kaepernick's national anthem protest and the NFL players who joined him". SB Nation. Archived from the original on September 12, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2016.
- ^ Mindock, Clark (September 26, 2017). "Taking a knee: Why are NFL players protesting and when did they start kneeling?". The Independent. Archived from the original on September 26, 2017. Retrieved December 26, 2016.
- ^ "NFL player protests sweep league after President Donald Trump's hostile remarks". USA Today. September 25, 2017. Archived from the original on September 25, 2017. Retrieved December 26, 2017.
- ^ Fiddler, Carolyn (June 3, 2020). "Civiqs: Daily Tracking Poll Shows Dramatic Increase in Support for Black Lives Matter Movement". Daily Kos. Retrieved June 4, 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "About". Black Lives Matter. Archived from the original on May 11, 2018. Retrieved June 14, 2018.
- ^ a b c Simmons, Kami. "Cooperative Federalism and Police Reform" (PDF). Alabama Law Review. 62. Retrieved March 3, 2017.
- ^ Patton, Alison L. (1992–1993), Endless Cycle of Abuse: Why 42 U.S.C. 1983 Is Ineffective in Deterring Police Brutality, The, vol. 44, Hastings L.J., p. 753
- ^ "§ 14141. Cause of action (re-codified at 34 U.S.C. 12601)". The United States Department of Justice. August 6, 2015. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2020.
- ^ Alexa P. Freeman (March 1996), Unscheduled Departures: The Circumvention of Just Sentencing for Police Brutality, vol. 47, Hastings L.J., p. 677
- ^ Troutt, DD (1999), Screws, Koon, and Routine Aberrations: The Use of Fictional Narratives in Federal Police Brutality Prosecutions, NYUL Rev.
- ^ Barker, T (1978), An empirical study of police deviance other than corruption, Journal of Police Science and Administration
- ^ "Tennessee v. Garner". oyez. IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved March 6, 2017.
- ^ "Graham v. Connor". oyez. IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Archived from the original on March 17, 2017. Retrieved March 15, 2017.
- ^ Schwartz, Joanna C. (2017). "How Qualified ImmunityFails" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal. Yale Law School. Retrieved June 2, 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Blue". Archived from the original on July 16, 2019. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
Further reading
- Methods That Police Use on the Mentally Ill Are Madness. The Atlantic. March 25, 2015.
- Here Are 13 Killings by Police Captured on Video in the Past Year. Mother Jones. May 20, 2015.
- FBI chief: 'unacceptable' that Guardian has better data on police violence. The Guardian. October 8, 2015.
- Police Killings Surpass the Worst Years of Lynching, Capital Punishment, and a Movement Responds. Jerome Karabel for The Huffington Post. November 4, 2015.
- Police Killings Won’t Stop. Chris Hedges for Truthdig, September 25, 2016.
External links
- The Counted: Tracking people killed by police in the United States - The Guardian
- PuppycideDB. The first nationwide database tracking police shootings of animals.
- 3/7/91: Video of Rodney King Beaten by Police Released(ABC News)