Nederlandse Leeuw (talk | contribs) |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Misc citation tidying. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Use British English from April 2024 | #UCB_Category 319/716 |
||
(25 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{About|the 16th-century chronicle discovered by [[Nikolay Lvov]]|the 17th-century chronicle from Halych (Galicia)|Lviv Chronicle}} |
{{About|the 16th-century chronicle discovered by [[Nikolay Lvov]]|the 17th-century chronicle from Halych (Galicia)|Lviv Chronicle}} |
||
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2024}}{{use British English|date=April 2024}} |
|||
{{Infobox medieval text |
{{Infobox medieval text |
||
| name = ''Lvov Chronicle'' |
| name = ''Lvov Chronicle'' |
||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
* ''Etter Manuscript'' |
* ''Etter Manuscript'' |
||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''Lvov Chronicle''' ({{lang-ru|Львовская летопись|translit=L'vovskaya letopis'}}) is a [[Rus' chronicle]] from the 16th century, containing [[annals|annalistic]] entries until the year 1533.<ref name="СКК">Iakov Lur'e, '' [http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=4283 Летопись Львовская] {{ |
The '''''Lvov Chronicle''''' ({{lang-ru|Львовская летопись|translit=L'vovskaya letopis'}}) is a [[Rus' chronicle]] from the 16th century, containing [[annals|annalistic]] entries until the year 1533.<ref name="СКК">Iakov Lur'e, '' [http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=4283 Летопись Львовская] {{Internet Archive|url=http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=4283 |date=20210118005847 }} // Словарь книжников и книжности Древней Руси (''Dictionary of scribes and bookishness of Ancient Rus'') : [в 4 вып.] / [[Russian Academy of Sciences]], [[Pushkin House]]; Revised edition by [[Dmitry Likhachev]] [et al.]. Leningrad: [[Nauka (publisher)|Nauka]], 1987—2017. Vol. 2 : The second half of the 14th-16th century, chapter 2 : L-Ya / ed. D. M. Bulanin, G. M. Prokhorov. 1989.</ref> It is named after its discoverer, [[Nikolay Lvov]] (1753–1803). |
||
== Contents == |
== Contents == |
||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
The text is full of typos, misspellings, and errors in chronology and history.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} |
The text is full of typos, misspellings, and errors in chronology and history.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} |
||
* The beginning of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' is lost.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} The opening section is devoted to genealogy and [[regnal list]]s. The surviving text starts with what appears to be a Byzantine imperial genealogy, mentioning the names of [[Palaiologos]] family members. Then it states 'In the year 6663 [1155], the first to come from the Varangians was Riurikŭ and his two brothers, Seneus and Tuvor. Riurikŭ's son was Igor'.'{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=1}} By contrast, the ''[[Primary Chronicle]]'' dates the [[calling of the Varangians]] to ''[[Anno Mundi]]'' 6360 (862 in the [[Gregorian calendar]]). A [[Bible|biblical]] regnal list follows, misdating the [[birth of Jesus]] to 5500 (284), then a regnal list of Roman and Byzantine emperors until [[Constantine VII]].{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|pp=1–11}} Then a confused genealogy of Rus' princes starts with [[Rurik|Riurikŭ]].{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|pp=11–12}} Finally, there is a regnal list of khans of the [[Golden Horde]] beginning with [[Batu Khan|Baty]].{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=12}} |
* The beginning of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' is lost.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} The opening section is devoted to genealogy and [[regnal list]]s. The surviving text starts with what appears to be a Byzantine imperial genealogy, mentioning the names of [[Palaiologos]] family members. Then it states 'In the year 6663 [1155], the first to come from the Varangians was Riurikŭ and his two brothers, Seneus and Tuvor. Riurikŭ's son was Igor'.'{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=1}} By contrast, the ''[[Primary Chronicle]]'' dates the [[calling of the Varangians]] to ''[[Anno Mundi]]'' 6360 (862 in the [[Gregorian calendar]]). A [[Bible|biblical]] regnal list follows, misdating the [[birth of Jesus]] to 5500 (284), then a regnal list of Roman and Byzantine emperors until [[Constantine VII]].{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|pp=1–11}} Then a confused genealogy of Rus' princes starts with [[Rurik|Riurikŭ]].{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|pp=11–12}} Finally, there is a regnal list of khans of the [[Golden Horde]] beginning with [[Batu Khan|Baty]].{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=12}} |
||
* The narrative part of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' commences with an interpretation of the [[Four kingdoms of Daniel]], and then relates a mixture of biblical, Greek, Roman and Byzantine history. The author identifies ''Rus{{'}}'' as an area in the part of the world given to [[Noah]]'s [[Japheth]] after [[Genesis flood narrative|the Flood]], and recounts the tradition that [[Andrew the Apostle]] visited ancient [[Kyiv|Kiev]]. From there, the ''Lvov Chronicle'' presents a similar narrative to the '' |
* The narrative part of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' commences with an interpretation of the [[Four kingdoms of Daniel]], and then relates a mixture of biblical, Greek, Roman and Byzantine history. The author identifies ''Rus{{'}}'' as an area in the part of the world given to [[Noah]]'s [[Japheth]] after [[Genesis flood narrative|the Flood]], and recounts the tradition that [[Andrew the Apostle]] visited ancient [[Kyiv|Kiev]].{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|pp=39–41}} From there, the ''Lvov Chronicle'' presents a similar narrative to the ''[[Ermolin Chronicle]]'' until the late 14th century.<ref name="СКК" /> |
||
* From the late 14th century to 1518, the text is similar to the ''[[Sofia Second Chronicle]]''.<ref name="СКК" /> The chronicle continues until 1533.<ref name="СКК" /> |
|||
* Then in a number of manuscripts reads ''Chronicler of the Beginning of the Kingdom''. |
* Then in a number of manuscripts reads ''Chronicler of the Beginning of the Kingdom''.<ref name="СКК" /> |
||
* The ''Lvov Chronicle'' contains, among other things, ''[[A Journey Beyond the Three Seas]]'' by [[Afanasy Nikitin]]. |
* The ''Lvov Chronicle'' contains, among other things, ''[[A Journey Beyond the Three Seas]]'' by [[Afanasy Nikitin]].<ref name="СКК"/> This is one of the sections omitted in the 1792 Lvov ''[[editio princeps]]''.<ref name="СКК"/> |
||
* A letter allegedly written by [[Ivan the Terrible]], which is similar to the text found in the ''[[Nikon Chronicle]]''.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=IV}} |
* A letter allegedly written by [[Ivan the Terrible]], which is similar to the text found in the ''[[Nikon Chronicle]]''.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=IV}} |
||
Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
The chronicle was [[editio princeps|first published]] in [[Saint Petersburg]] in 1792 by [[Nikolay Lvov|Nikolay Aleksandrovich Lvov]], from whom it takes its name, with a number of omissions.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} He gave it the title ''Chronicler of Rus' from the accession of Rurik to the death of Tsar John Vasilyevich'' ({{lang-ru|Лѣтописецъ Руской отъ пришествія Рурика до кончины Царя Іоанна Васильевича}};{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} the latter is better known as [[Ivan the Terrible]]). Lvov based himself on a manuscript from the [[Monastery of Saint Euthymius]] in [[Suzdal]], which was subsequently lost.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} In 1903, [[Alexander Presnyakov]] found Karl Etter's manuscript of the chronicle,<ref>[[National Library of Russia]], F.IV.144.</ref> which then formed the basis for the 1910–1914 edition of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' in the ''[[Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles]]'', prepared by Sergey Aleksandrovich Adrianov.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|pp=III–IV}} |
The chronicle was [[editio princeps|first published]] in [[Saint Petersburg]] in 1792 by [[Nikolay Lvov|Nikolay Aleksandrovich Lvov]], from whom it takes its name, with a number of omissions.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} He gave it the title ''Chronicler of Rus' from the accession of Rurik to the death of Tsar John Vasilyevich'' ({{lang-ru|Лѣтописецъ Руской отъ пришествія Рурика до кончины Царя Іоанна Васильевича}};{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} the latter is better known as [[Ivan the Terrible]]). Lvov based himself on a manuscript from the [[Monastery of Saint Euthymius]] in [[Suzdal]], which was subsequently lost.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|p=III}} In 1903, [[Alexander Presnyakov]] found Karl Etter's manuscript of the chronicle,<ref>[[National Library of Russia]], F.IV.144.</ref> which then formed the basis for the 1910–1914 edition of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' in the ''[[Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles]]'', prepared by Sergey Aleksandrovich Adrianov.{{sfn|Adrianov|1910|pp=III–IV}} |
||
[[Aleksey Shakhmatov]] noted the similarities of the text of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' and the ''[[Sofia Second Chronicle]]'' in entries from the late 14th century until the year 1518. In his opinion, the basis for both chronicles was the 1518 codex.<ref name="СКК" /> Arseniy Nikolaevich Nasonov |
[[Aleksey Shakhmatov]] (1892) noted the similarities of the text of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' and the ''[[Sofia Second Chronicle]]'' in entries from the late 14th century until the year 1518. In his opinion, the basis for both chronicles was the 1518 codex.<ref name="СКК" /> Arseniy Nikolaevich Nasonov (1930) suggested that the source of this code was the code of opposition to [[Ivan III of Moscow|Ivan III]] of the 1480s.<ref>Arseniy Nikolaevich Nasonov, Летописные памятники Тверского княжества (''Chronicle Monuments of the Tverian Principality'') (1930), p. 714–721. [[Nauka (publisher)|Izvestiia AN SSSR]]. VII series, no. 9. Leningrad.</ref><ref name="СКК"/> |
||
Iakov S. Lur'e (1989) pointed out the closeness of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' to the Archival manuscript of the ''Sofia Second Chronicle'', up to the repetition of the defects of this copy. At the same time, there are primary readings in a number of places in the ''Lvov Chronicle''. Thus, the latter has preserved some information, presumably dating back to the 1480s and lost in the ''Sofia Second Chronicle'': information about the murder of [[Dmitry Shemyaka]], carried out at the behest of [[Vasily II of Moscow|Vasily II the Dark]]; the full text of the story of the [[Battle of Shelon|Muscovite defeat of Novgorod in 1471]] and others. According to Lur'e, the source of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' was the 1518 corpus: the direct original of the Archival copy of the ''Sofia Second Chronicle''. The first part of the ''Lvov Chronicle'' has no direct correspondence with the ''Sofia Second Chronicle''. This part is close to the text of the ''Ermolin Chronicle'', coinciding with it in all the differences that the latter has here in relation to its source: a special processing of the hypothetical [[Novgorodsko-Sofiysky Svod]], reflected also in the 1479 ''Grand Princely Codex of Moscow''. The ''Lvov Chronicle'' also reflects a text close to the ''[[Radziwiłł Chronicle]]''.<ref name="СКК" /> |
|||
[[Лурье, Яков Соломонович|Я. С. Лурье]] указал на близость Львовской летописи к Архивскому списку Софийской второй летописи, вплоть до повторения дефектов этого списка. В то же время в ряде мест Львовской летописи имеются первичные чтения. Так, последняя сохранила известия, предположительно, восходящие к своду 1480-х годов и утраченные в Софийской второй летописи: известие об убийстве [[Дмитрий Юрьевич Шемяка|Дмитрия Шемяки]], осуществлённом по указанию [[Василий II Тёмный|Василия II]]; полный текст рассказа о [[Московско-новгородская война (1471)|завоевании Новгорода в 1471 году]] и др. По мнению Лурье, источником Львовской летописи являлся свод 1518 года — непосредственный оригинал Архивского списка Софийской второй летописи. Первая часть Львовской летописи не имеет прямого соответствия с Софийской второй летописью. Эта часть близка к тексту [[Ермолинская летопись|Ермолинской летописи]], совпадая с ней во всех отличиях, которые последняя имеет здесь по отношению к своему источнику — особой обработке «[[Новгородско-Софийский свод|свода 1448 года]]», отразившейся также в [[Московский великокняжеский свод 1479 года|Московском великокняжеском своде 1479 года]]. Львовская летопись отражает также текст, близкий к [[Радзивиловская летопись|Радзивиловской летописи]]<ref name="СКК" />. Согласно [[Клосс, Борис Михайлович|Б. М. Клоссу]], Львовская летопись является компиляцией двух памятников: вначале она следует своду 1518 года вплоть до его завершения, затем — своду 1560 года. |
|||
== References == |
|||
Выделяется две [[редакция (текстология)|редакции]] свода 1518 года. Первая редакция была создана в результате соединения Ростовского свода 1489 года и великокняжеской летописи, доведённой до 1518 года и известной в составе [[Летописец от 72-х язык|Уваровской летописи]]). Вторая возникла в результате дополнения первой из различных источников, в том числе из [[Московский великокняжеский свод конца XV века|Московского великокняжеского свода конца XV века]], [[Сокращённый летописный свод|Сокращённого летописного свода]] 1491 года, материалов митрополичьего архива, компиляции, включавшей Ермолинскую летопись, летописи, сходной с Типографской, и [[Софийская первая летопись|Софийской первой летописи]] (по Клоссу). Одним из основных источников свода 1518 года считается свод 1480-х годов, оппозиционный Ивану III. К этому своду восходит ряд уникальных известий в Львовской и Софийской второй летописях, завершающийся известиями 1480-х годов. По мнению Клосса и [[Назаров, Владислав Дмитриевич|В. Д. Назарова]], составителями свода 1518 года были книжники московского [[Успенский собор (Москва)|Успенского собора]]. По мнению Кистерёва — летописец священника московской [[Колокольня Ивана Великого|церкви Иоанна Лествичника]] Петра-Кифы, составившего также «Слова на второе перенесение мощей митрополита Петра» и «Сказания от чудес некоего любомудреца»<ref name="ПЭ">{{Православная энциклопедия|2463609|Летописание XVI—XVIII вв. // Летописание|40|628—644|[[Вовина-Лебедева В. Г.]], Жуков А. Е.}}</ref>. |
|||
== Примечания == |
|||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
== Literature == |
== Literature == |
||
⚫ | |||
* ''[[Шахматов, Алексей Александрович|Шахматов А. А.]]'' Разбор сочинения [[Тихомиров, Иван Александрович|И. А. Тихомирова]] «Обозрение летописных сводов Руси Северо-Восточной». — СПб., 1892. — С. 21, 41—48. |
|||
* ''Extract from the minutes of the meeting of the Archaeographic Commission. Annals of the activities of the Archaeographical Commission. Volume 26'' (1914), pp. 54–55. Saint Petersburg. |
|||
* ''Шахматов А. А.'' Исследование о Радзивиловской, или Кёнигсбергской, летописи // Радзивиловская, или Кёнигсбергская, летопись. — СПб., 1902. — Т. 2. С. 90 (Общество любителей древней письменности. — Вып. 118). |
|||
* Nasonov, Arseniy Nikolaevich, Летописные памятники Тверского княжества (''Chronicle Monuments of the Tverian Principality'') (1930), pp. 714–721. [[Nauka (publisher)|Izvestiia AN SSSR]]. VII series, no. 9. Leningrad. |
|||
⚫ | |||
* Likhachev, Dmitry, Русские летописи и их культурно-историческое значение (''Russian Chronicles and Their Cultural Significance'') (1947), pp. 474–475. Moscow; Leningrad. |
|||
* Извлечение из протоколов заседания Археографической комиссии // [[Летопись занятий Археографической комиссии]]. — СПб., 1914. — Вып. 26. — С. 54—55. |
|||
* Lur'e, Iakov, ''Kholmogorsky Chronicle. Proceedings of the Department of Old Rus' Literature. Volume 25.'' (1970), pp. 140–141. Moscow; Leningrad. |
|||
* ''[[Насонов, Арсений Николаевич|Насонов А. Н.]]'' Летописные памятники Тверского княжества // [[Известия АН СССР]]. — VII сер. — Л., 1930. — № 9. — С. 714—721. |
|||
* Lur'e, Iakov, ''All-Rus' Chronicles of the 14th–15th Centuries'' (1976), pp. 210–213, 223–240. Leningrad. |
|||
* ''[[Лихачёв, Дмитрий Сергеевич|Лихачёв Д. С.]]'' Русские летописи и их культурно-историческое значение. — М. ; Л., 1947. — С. 474—475. |
|||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Lvov Chronicle'' (16th century)}} |
|||
* ''[[Лурье, Яков Соломонович|Лурье Я. С.]]'' [[Холмогорская летопись]] // [[Труды Отдела древнерусской литературы]]. — М. ; Л., 1970. — Т. 25. — С. 140—141. |
|||
⚫ | |||
* ''Лурье Я. С.'' Общерусские летописи XIV—XV вв. — Л., 1976. — С. 210—213, 223—240. |
|||
⚫ | |||
* ''Лурье Я. С.'' Генеалогическая схема летописей XI—XVI вв., включённых в «Словарь книжников и книжности Древней Руси» // Труды Отдела древнерусской литературы. — Л., 1985. — Т. 40. — С. 190—205. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ |
Revision as of 11:39, 4 May 2024
Lvov Chronicle | |
---|---|
Author(s) | unknown |
Language | Church Slavonic |
Date | c. 1533 |
Manuscript(s) | 2 main textual witnesses:
|
Genre | Rus' chronicle |
Period covered | until 1533 |
The Lvov Chronicle (Russian: Львовская летопись, romanized: L'vovskaya letopis') is a Rus' chronicle from the 16th century, containing annalistic entries until the year 1533.[1] It is named after its discoverer, Nikolay Lvov (1753–1803).
Contents
The text is full of typos, misspellings, and errors in chronology and history.[2]
- The beginning of the Lvov Chronicle is lost.[2] The opening section is devoted to genealogy and regnal lists. The surviving text starts with what appears to be a Byzantine imperial genealogy, mentioning the names of Palaiologos family members. Then it states 'In the year 6663 [1155], the first to come from the Varangians was Riurikŭ and his two brothers, Seneus and Tuvor. Riurikŭ's son was Igor'.'[3] By contrast, the Primary Chronicle dates the calling of the Varangians to Anno Mundi 6360 (862 in the Gregorian calendar). A biblical regnal list follows, misdating the birth of Jesus to 5500 (284), then a regnal list of Roman and Byzantine emperors until Constantine VII.[4] Then a confused genealogy of Rus' princes starts with Riurikŭ.[5] Finally, there is a regnal list of khans of the Golden Horde beginning with Baty.[6]
- The narrative part of the Lvov Chronicle commences with an interpretation of the Four kingdoms of Daniel, and then relates a mixture of biblical, Greek, Roman and Byzantine history. The author identifies Rus' as an area in the part of the world given to Noah's Japheth after the Flood, and recounts the tradition that Andrew the Apostle visited ancient Kiev.[7] From there, the Lvov Chronicle presents a similar narrative to the Ermolin Chronicle until the late 14th century.[1]
- From the late 14th century to 1518, the text is similar to the Sofia Second Chronicle.[1] The chronicle continues until 1533.[1]
- Then in a number of manuscripts reads Chronicler of the Beginning of the Kingdom.[1]
- The Lvov Chronicle contains, among other things, A Journey Beyond the Three Seas by Afanasy Nikitin.[1] This is one of the sections omitted in the 1792 Lvov editio princeps.[1]
- A letter allegedly written by Ivan the Terrible, which is similar to the text found in the Nikon Chronicle.[8]
Textual criticism
The chronicle was first published in Saint Petersburg in 1792 by Nikolay Aleksandrovich Lvov, from whom it takes its name, with a number of omissions.[2] He gave it the title Chronicler of Rus' from the accession of Rurik to the death of Tsar John Vasilyevich (Russian: Лѣтописецъ Руской отъ пришествія Рурика до кончины Царя Іоанна Васильевича;[2] the latter is better known as Ivan the Terrible). Lvov based himself on a manuscript from the Monastery of Saint Euthymius in Suzdal, which was subsequently lost.[2] In 1903, Alexander Presnyakov found Karl Etter's manuscript of the chronicle,[9] which then formed the basis for the 1910–1914 edition of the Lvov Chronicle in the Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles, prepared by Sergey Aleksandrovich Adrianov.[10]
Aleksey Shakhmatov (1892) noted the similarities of the text of the Lvov Chronicle and the Sofia Second Chronicle in entries from the late 14th century until the year 1518. In his opinion, the basis for both chronicles was the 1518 codex.[1] Arseniy Nikolaevich Nasonov (1930) suggested that the source of this code was the code of opposition to Ivan III of the 1480s.[11][1]
Iakov S. Lur'e (1989) pointed out the closeness of the Lvov Chronicle to the Archival manuscript of the Sofia Second Chronicle, up to the repetition of the defects of this copy. At the same time, there are primary readings in a number of places in the Lvov Chronicle. Thus, the latter has preserved some information, presumably dating back to the 1480s and lost in the Sofia Second Chronicle: information about the murder of Dmitry Shemyaka, carried out at the behest of Vasily II the Dark; the full text of the story of the Muscovite defeat of Novgorod in 1471 and others. According to Lur'e, the source of the Lvov Chronicle was the 1518 corpus: the direct original of the Archival copy of the Sofia Second Chronicle. The first part of the Lvov Chronicle has no direct correspondence with the Sofia Second Chronicle. This part is close to the text of the Ermolin Chronicle, coinciding with it in all the differences that the latter has here in relation to its source: a special processing of the hypothetical Novgorodsko-Sofiysky Svod, reflected also in the 1479 Grand Princely Codex of Moscow. The Lvov Chronicle also reflects a text close to the Radziwiłł Chronicle.[1]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Iakov Lur'e, Летопись Львовская Lvov Chronicle (16th century) at the Internet Archive // Словарь книжников и книжности Древней Руси (Dictionary of scribes and bookishness of Ancient Rus) : [в 4 вып.] / Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkin House; Revised edition by Dmitry Likhachev [et al.]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1987—2017. Vol. 2 : The second half of the 14th-16th century, chapter 2 : L-Ya / ed. D. M. Bulanin, G. M. Prokhorov. 1989.
- ^ a b c d e Adrianov 1910, p. III.
- ^ Adrianov 1910, p. 1.
- ^ Adrianov 1910, pp. 1–11.
- ^ Adrianov 1910, pp. 11–12.
- ^ Adrianov 1910, p. 12.
- ^ Adrianov 1910, pp. 39–41.
- ^ Adrianov 1910, p. IV.
- ^ National Library of Russia, F.IV.144.
- ^ Adrianov 1910, pp. III–IV.
- ^ Arseniy Nikolaevich Nasonov, Летописные памятники Тверского княжества (Chronicle Monuments of the Tverian Principality) (1930), p. 714–721. Izvestiia AN SSSR. VII series, no. 9. Leningrad.
Editions
- Летописец русской от пришествия Рурика до кончины царя Иоанна Васильевича (Chronicler of Rus' from the accession of Rurik to the death of Tsar John Vasilyevich). Nikolay Lvov. Saint Petersburg, 1792. Parts 1–5.
- Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles. Volume 20. Lvov Chronicle (according to the Etter Manuscript).
- Volume 20. Lvov Chronicle. Part 1. Edited by Sergey Alexandrovich Adrianov. Saint Petersburg: Typography M.A. Aleksandrov, 1910. 418 pages.
- Volume 20. Lvov Chronicle. Part 2. Edited by Sergey Alexandrovich Adrianov. Saint Petersburg: Typography M.A. Aleksandrov, 1914. Pages 420–686.
- Volume 20. Lvov Chronicle. Мoscow, 2004. 704 pages.
- Lvov Chronicle. Ryazan: Uzorochie, 1999.
- Part 1. 720 p.
- Part 2. 648 p. (Series ‘Rus' Chronicles’, vol. 4, 5).
Literature
- Shakhmatov, Aleksey, Ермолинская летопись и Ростовский владычный свод (The Ermolin Chronicle and Rostov Vladychny Codex) (1904), pp. 26–48. Saint Petersburg.
- Extract from the minutes of the meeting of the Archaeographic Commission. Annals of the activities of the Archaeographical Commission. Volume 26 (1914), pp. 54–55. Saint Petersburg.
- Nasonov, Arseniy Nikolaevich, Летописные памятники Тверского княжества (Chronicle Monuments of the Tverian Principality) (1930), pp. 714–721. Izvestiia AN SSSR. VII series, no. 9. Leningrad.
- Likhachev, Dmitry, Русские летописи и их культурно-историческое значение (Russian Chronicles and Their Cultural Significance) (1947), pp. 474–475. Moscow; Leningrad.
- Lur'e, Iakov, Kholmogorsky Chronicle. Proceedings of the Department of Old Rus' Literature. Volume 25. (1970), pp. 140–141. Moscow; Leningrad.
- Lur'e, Iakov, All-Rus' Chronicles of the 14th–15th Centuries (1976), pp. 210–213, 223–240. Leningrad.