Station statistics | |
---|---|
SATCAT no. | 25544 |
Call sign | Alpha |
Crew | 6 Expedition 28 |
Launch | 1998–2012 |
Launch pad | Baikonur LC-81/23, LC-1/5 KSC LC-39, |
Mass | 417,289 kg (919,965 lb) (as of 03/09/2011)[1] |
Length | 51 m (167.3 ft) from PMA-2 to Zvezda |
Width | 109 m (357.5 ft) along truss, arrays extended |
Height | c. 20 m (c. 66 ft) nadir–zenith, arrays forward–aft (27 November 2009)[needs update] |
Pressurised volume | 837 m3 (29,600 cu ft) (21 March 2011) |
Atmospheric pressure | 101.3 kPa (29.91 inHg, 1 atm) |
Periapsis altitude | 352 km (190 nmi) AMSL (21 March 2011) |
Apoapsis altitude | 355 km (192 nmi) AMSL (21 March 2011) |
Orbital inclination | 51.6 degrees |
Orbital speed | 7,706.6 m/s (27,743.8 km/h, 17,239.2 mph) |
Orbital period | 91 minutes |
Days in orbit | 9331 (7 June) |
Days occupied | 8618 (7 June) |
No. of orbits | 146465 (7 June) |
Orbital decay | 2 km/month |
Statistics as of 9 March 2011 (unless noted otherwise) References:[2][3][4][5][6][7] | |
Configuration | |
The International Space Station (ISS) is an internationally-developed research facility, which is being assembled in low Earth orbit and is the largest space station ever constructed.[8] On-orbit construction of the station began in 1998 and is expected to be finished in 2012. The station is expected to remain in operation until at least 2020, and potentially to 2028.[9][10] Like many artificial satellites, the ISS can be seen from Earth with the naked eye. The ISS serves as a research laboratory that has a microgravity environment in which crews conduct experiments in biology, human biology, physics, astronomy and meteorology.[11][12][13] The station has a unique environment for the testing of the spacecraft systems that will be required for missions to the Moon and Mars.[14] The ISS is operated by Expedition crews, and has been continuously staffed since 2 November 2000—an uninterrupted human presence in space for the past Template:Ageand.[15] As of June 2011, the crew of Expedition 28 is aboard.[16]
The ISS is a synthesis of several space station projects that includes the American Freedom, the Soviet/Russian Mir-2, the European Columbus and the Japanese Kibō.[17][18] Budget constraints led to the merger of these projects into a single multi-national programme.[17] The ISS project began in 1994 with the Shuttle-Mir program,[19] and the first module of the station, Zarya, was launched in 1998 by Russia.[17] Since then, pressurised modules, external trusses and other components have been launched by American space shuttles, Russian Proton rockets and Russian Soyuz rockets.[18] As of June 2011, the station consisted of 15 pressurised modules and an extensive integrated truss structure (ITS). The planned final module, the Russian laboratory module, is expected to launch in 2012. Power is provided by 16 solar arrays mounted on the external truss, in addition to four smaller arrays on the Russian modules.[20] The station is maintained at an orbit between 278 km (173 mi) and 460 km (286 mi) altitude, and travels at an average ground speed of 27,724 km (17,227 mi) per hour, completing 15.7 orbits per day.[21]
Operated as a joint project between the five participant space agencies, the station's sections are controlled by mission control centres on the ground operated by the American National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Russian Federal Space Agency (RKA), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), and the European Space Agency (ESA).[22][23] The ownership and use of the space station is established in intergovernmental treaties and agreements[24] that allow the Russian Federation to retain full ownership of its own modules,[25] with the remainder of the station allocated between the other international partners.[24] The station is serviced by Soyuz spacecraft, Progress spacecraft, space shuttles, the Automated Transfer Vehicle and the H-II Transfer Vehicle,[23] and has been visited by astronauts and cosmonauts from 15 different nations.[26] The cost of the station has been estimated by ESA as €100 billion over 30 years,[27] although other estimates range from 35 billion dollars to 160 billion dollars.[28] The financing, research capabilities and technical design of the ISS programme have been criticised because of the high cost.[29][30]
Purpose
According to the original Memorandum of Understanding between NASA and RSA, the International Space Station was intended to be a laboratory, observatory and factory in space. It was also planned to provide transportation, servicing and act as a staging base for possible future missions to the Moon, Mars and asteroids.[25]
Scientific research
The ISS is a long-term platform in the space environment where extended studies are conducted.[26][31] The presence of a permanent crew affords the ability to monitor, replenish, repair, and replace experiments and components of the spacecraft itself. The ISS provides a platform to conduct experiments that require one or more of the unusual conditions present on the station. The primary fields of research include human research, space medicine, life sciences, physical sciences, astronomy and meteorology.[11][12][13][32][33] Scientists on Earth have access to the crew's data and can modify experiments or launch new ones; benefits generally unavailable on unmanned spacecraft.[31] Crews fly expeditions of several months duration, providing approximately 160 man-hours a week of labor with a crew of 6.[11][34]
Research on the ISS improves knowledge about the effects of long-term space exposure on the human body, including muscle atrophy, bone loss, and fluid shift. This data will be used to determine whether lengthy human spaceflight and space colonization are feasible. As of 2006, data on bone loss and muscular atrophy suggest that there would be a significant risk of fractures and movement problems if astronauts landed on a planet after a lengthy interplanetary cruise, such as the six-month interval required to travel to Mars.[35][36] Medical studies are conducted aboard the ISS on behalf of the National Space and Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI). Prominent among these is the Advanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Microgravity study in which astronauts perform ultrasound scans under the guidance of remote experts. The study considers the diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions in space. Usually, there is no physician onboard the ISS and diagnosis of medical conditions is a challenge. It is anticipated that remotely guided ultrasound scans will have application on Earth in emergency and rural care situations where access to a trained physician is difficult.[37][38][39]
Exploration
The ISS provides a location in the relative safety of Low Earth Orbit to test spacecraft systems that will be required for long-duration missions to the Moon and Mars. This provides experience in the maintenance, repair, and replacement of systems on-orbit, which will be essential in operating spacecraft further from Earth. Mission risks are reduced, and the capabilities of interplanetary spacecraft are advanced.[14] The ESA states that "Whereas the ISS is essential for answering questions concerning the possible impact of weightlessness, radiation and other space-specific factors, other aspects such as the effect of long-term isolation and confinement can be more appropriately addressed via ground-based simulations".[40]
A Mars exploration mission may be a multinational effort involving space agencies and countries outside the current ISS partnership. In 2010 ESA Director-General Jean-Jacques Dordain stated his agency was ready to propose to the other 4 partners that China, India and South Korea be invited to join the ISS partnership.[41] NASA chief Charlie Bolden stated in Feb 2011 "Any mission to Mars is likely to be a global effort".[42]
As of 2011, the space agencies of Europe, Russia and China are carrying out the ground-based preparations in the Mars500 project, which complement the ISS-based preparations for a manned mission to Mars.[43] China is planning to launch its own Space station in 2011,[44] and has officially initiated its program for a modular station.[45] However, China has indicated a willingness to cooperate further with other countries on manned exploration.[46]
Education and Cultural Outreach
Part of the crew's mission is educational outreach and international cooperation. The crew of the ISS provide opportunities for students on Earth by running student-developed experiments, making educational demonstrations, allowing for student participation in classroom versions of ISS experiments, and directly engaging students using radio, videolink and email. The ISS program itself allows more than 20 nations to live and work together in space, providing lessons in international cooperation for future multi-national missions.[23][47]
Amateur Radio on the ISS (ARISS) is a volunteer program which inspires students worldwide to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics through amateur radio communications opportunities with the ISS crew. ARISS is an international working group, consisting of delegations from 9 countries including several countries in Europe as well as Japan, Russia, Canada, and the USA. The organization is run by volunteers from the national amateur radio organizations and the international AMSAT (Radio Amateur Satellite Corporation) organizations from each country.[48]
Origins
The International Space Station represents a union of several national space station projects that originated during the Cold War. In the early 1980s, NASA planned to launch a modular space station called Freedom as a counterpart to the Soviet Salyut and Mir space stations, while the Soviets were planning to construct Mir-2 in the 1990s as a replacement for Mir.[17] Because of budget and design constraints, Freedom never progressed past mock-ups and minor component tests.
With the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Space Race, Freedom was nearly cancelled by the United States House of Representatives. The post-Soviet economic chaos in Russia led to the cancellation of Mir-2, though only after its base block, DOS-8, had been constructed.[17] Similar budgetary difficulties were faced by other nations with space station projects, which prompted the American government to negotiate with European states, Russia, Japan, and Canada in the early 1990s to begin a collaborative project.[17]
In June 1992, American president George H. W. Bush and Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed to cooperate on space exploration. The resulting Agreement between the United States of America and the Russian Federation Concerning Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes called for a short, joint space program, with one American astronaut deployed to the Russian space station Mir and two Russian cosmonauts deployed to a Space Shuttle.[17]
In September 1993, American Vice-President Al Gore, Jr., and Russian Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin announced plans for a new space station, which eventually became the International Space Station.[49] They also agreed, in preparation for this new project, that the United States would be heavily involved in the Mir program as part of an agreement that later included Space Shuttle orbiters docking with Mir.[19] According to the plan, the International Space Station program would combine the proposed space stations of all participant agencies: NASA's Freedom, the RSA's Mir-2 (with DOS-8 later becoming Zvezda), ESA's Columbus, and the Japanese Kibō laboratory.[citation needed] When the first module, Zarya, was launched in 1998, the station was expected to be completed by 2003. Delays have led to a revised estimated completion date of 2011.[50]
The Russian Orbital Segment is the eleventh Soviet-Russian space station. Mir and the ISS are successors to the Salyut and Almaz stations. Salyut 6 included Soviet crews and cosmonauts from Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Cuba, Mongolia, Vietnam, and East Germany. Salyut 7 included crew from India and France during its almost 9-year lifespan. Mir was visited by crews from a dozen nations during the station's 15-year lifespan, and ISS expands on this international co-operation with crew from more than 14 nations.[17]
Station structure
Assembly
The assembly of the International Space Station, a major endeavour in space architecture, began in November 1998.[3] Russian modules launch and dock robotically, with the exception of Rassvet. All other modules were delivered by space shuttle, which required installation by ISS and shuttle crewmembers using the SSRMS and EVAs; as of 5 June 2011, they had added 159 components during more than 1,000 hours of EVA activity. 127 of these spacewalks originated from the station,while the remaining 32 were launched from the airlocks of docked space shuttles.[2] Rassvet was delivered by NASA's Atlantis Space Shuttle in 2010 in exchange for the Russian Proton delivery of the US-funded Russian-built Zarya Module in 1998.[51] Robot arms rather than EVAs were utilized in its installation (docking).
The first segment of the ISS, Zarya, was launched on 20 November 1998 on an autonomous Russian Proton rocket. It provided propulsion, orientation control, communications, electrical power, but lacked long-term life support functions. Two weeks later a passive NASA module Unity was launched aboard Space Shuttle flight STS-88 and attached to Zarya by astronauts during EVAs. This module has two Pressurized Mating Adapters (PMAs), one connects permanently to Zarya, the other allows the space shuttle to dock to the space station. At this time, the Russian station MIR was still inhabited. The ISS remained unmanned for two years, during which time MIR was de-orbited. On July 12, 2000 Zvezda was launched into orbit. Preprogrammed commands onboard deployed its solar arrays and communications antenna. It then became the passive vehicle for a rendezvous with the Zarya and Unity. As a passive "target" vehicle, the Zvezda maintained a stationkeeping orbit as the Zarya-Unity vehicle performed the rendezvous and docking via ground control and the Russian automated rendezvous and docking system. Zarya's computer transferred control of the station to Zvezda's computer soon after docking. Zvezda added sleeping quarters, a toilet, kitchen, CO2 scrubbers, dehumidifier, oxygen generators, exercise equipment, plus data, voice and television communications with mission control. This enabled permanent habitation of the station.[52][53]
The first resident crew, Expedition 1, arrived in November 2000 on Soyuz TM-31, midway between the flights of STS-92 and STS-97. These two Space Shuttle flights each added segments of the station's Integrated Truss Structure, which provided the station with Ku-band communication for U.S. television, additional attitude support needed for the additional weight of the USOS, and substantial solar arrays supplementing the station's existing 4 solar arrays.[54]
Over the next two years the station continued to expand. A Soyuz-U rocket delivered the Pirs docking compartment. The Space Shuttles Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour delivered the Destiny laboratory and Quest airlock, in addition to the station's main robot arm, the Canadarm2, and several more segments of the Integrated Truss Structure.[55]
The expansion schedule was interrupted by the destruction of the Space Shuttle Columbia on STS-107 in 2003, with the resulting hiatus in the Space Shuttle program halting station assembly until the launch of Discovery on STS-114 in 2005.[56]
The official resumption of assembly was marked by the arrival of Atlantis, flying STS-115, which delivered the station's second set of solar arrays. Several more truss segments and a third set of arrays were delivered on STS-116, STS-117, and STS-118. As a result of the major expansion of the station's power-generating capabilities, more pressurised modules could be accommodated, and the Harmony node and Columbus European laboratory were added. These were followed shortly after by the first two components of Kibō. In March 2009, STS-119 completed the Integrated Truss Structure with the installation of the fourth and final set of solar arrays. The final section of Kibō was delivered in July 2009 on STS-127, followed by the Russian Poisk module. The third node, Tranquility, was delivered in February 2010 during STS-130 by the Space Shuttle Endeavour, alongside the Cupola, closely followed in May 2010 by the penultimate Russian module, Rassvet, delivered by Space Shuttle Atlantis on STS-132. The last pressurised module of the USOS, Leonardo, was brought to the station by Discovery on her final flight, STS-133, followed by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on STS-134, delivered by Endeavour.
As of June 2011, the station consisted of fifteen pressurised modules and the Integrated Truss Structure. Still to be launched are the Russian Multipurpose Laboratory Module Nauka and a number of external components, including the European Robotic Arm. Assembly is expected to be completed by 2012, by which point the station will have a mass in excess of 400 metric tons (440 short tons).[3][50]
Pressurised modules
When completed in late 2011, the ISS will consist of sixteen pressurised modules with a combined volume of around 1,000 cubic metres (35,000 cu ft).[57] These modules include laboratories, docking compartments, airlocks, nodes and living quarters. Fifteen of these components are already in orbit, with the remaining one awaiting launch. Each module was or will be launched either by the Space Shuttle, Proton rocket or Soyuz rocket.[55]
Module | Assembly mission | Launch date | Launch system | Nation | Isolated view | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zarya (lit. dawn) (FGB) |
1A/R | 20 November 1998 | Proton-K | Russia (builder) USA (financier) |
[58] | |
The first component of the ISS to be launched, Zarya provided electrical power, storage, propulsion, and guidance during initial assembly. The module now serves as a storage compartment, both inside the pressurised section and in the externally mounted tanks which hold over 5.4 tons of fuel. | ||||||
Unity (Node 1) |
2A | 4 December 1998 | Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-88 | USA | [59] | |
The first node module, connecting the American section of the station to the Russian section (via PMA-1), and providing berthing locations for the Z1 truss, Quest airlock, Destiny laboratory, Tranquility node and the PMM Leonardo. | ||||||
Zvezda (lit. star) (service module) |
1R | 12 July 2000 | Proton-K | Russia | [60] | |
The station's service module, which provides the main living quarters for resident crews, environmental systems and attitude & orbit control. The module also provides additional docking locations for Soyuz spacecraft, Progress spacecraft and the Automated Transfer Vehicle, and its addition rendered the ISS permanently habitable for the first time. | ||||||
Destiny (US laboratory) |
5A | 7 February 2001 | Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-98 | USA | [61] | |
The primary research facility for US payloads aboard the ISS, Destiny is intended for general experiments. The module houses 24 International Standard Payload Racks, some of which are used for environmental systems and crew daily living equipment. Destiny also serves as the mounting point for most of the station's Integrated Truss Structure. | ||||||
Quest (joint airlock) |
7A | 12 July 2001 | Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-104 | USA | [62] | |
The USOS airlock, Quest hosts spacewalks with both US EMU and Russian Orlan spacesuits. Quest consists of two segments; the equipment lock, that stores spacesuits and equipment, and the crew lock, from which astronauts can exit into space. This module has a separately controlled atmosphere. Crew sleep in this module, breathing a low nitrogen mixture the night before scheduled EVAs, to avoid decompression sickness (known as "the bends") in the low pressure suits. | ||||||
Pirs (lit. pier) (docking compartment) |
4R | 14 September 2001 | Soyuz-U, Progress M-SO1 | Russia | [63] | |
Pirs provides the ISS with additional docking ports for Soyuz and Progress spacecraft, and allows egress and ingress for spacewalks by cosmonauts using Russian Orlan spacesuits, in addition to providing storage space for these spacesuits. | ||||||
Harmony (node 2) |
10A | 23 October 2007 | Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-120 | Europe (builder) USA (operator) |
[64] | |
The second of the station's node modules, Harmony is the utility hub of the ISS. The module contains four racks that provide electrical power, bus electronic data, and acts as a central connecting point for several other components via its six Common Berthing Mechanisms (CBMs). The European Columbus and Japanese Kibō laboratories are permanently berthed to the module, and American Space Shuttle Orbiters dock with the ISS via PMA-2, attached to Harmony's forward port. | ||||||
Columbus (European laboratory) |
1E | 7 February 2008 | Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-122 | Europe | [65][66] | |
The primary research facility for European payloads aboard the ISS, Columbus provides a generic laboratory as well as facilities specifically designed for biology, biomedical research and fluid physics. Several mounting locations are affixed to the exterior of the module, which provide power and data to external experiments such as the European Technology Exposure Facility (EuTEF), Solar Monitoring Observatory, Materials International Space Station Experiment, and Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space. A number of expansions are planned for the module to study quantum physics and cosmology. | ||||||
Kibō Experiment Logistics Module (lit. hope and wish JEM–ELM) |
1J/A | 11 March 2008 | Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-123 | Japan | [67] | |
Part of the Kibō Japanese Experiment Module laboratory, the ELM provides storage and transportation facilities to the laboratory with a pressurised section to serve internal payloads. | ||||||
Kibō Pressurised Module (JEM–PM) |
1J | 31 May 2008 | Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-124 | Japan | [67][68] | |
Part of the Kibō Japanese Experiment Module laboratory, the PM is the core module of Kibō to which the ELM and Exposed Facility are berthed. The laboratory is the largest single ISS module and contains a total of 23 racks, including 10 experiment racks. The module is used to carry out research in space medicine, biology, Earth observations, materials production, biotechnology, and communications research. The PM also serves as the mounting location for an external platform, the Exposed Facility (EF), that allows payloads to be directly exposed to the harsh space environment. The EF is serviced by the module's own robotic arm, the JEM–RMS, which is mounted on the PM. | ||||||
Poisk (lit. 'search') (mini-research module 2) |
5R | 10 November 2009 | Soyuz-U, Progress M-MIM2 | Russia | [69][70] | |
Poisk is the second Russian airlock for spacewalks, almost identical to Pirs, but lacking Strela cargo cranes. It is one of the four main Russian docking ports for Soyuz and Progress spacecraft, and is used as an interface for scientific experiments. | ||||||
Tranquility (node 3) |
20A | 8 February 2010 | Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-130 | Europe (builder) USA (operator) |
[71][72] | |
The third and last of the station's US nodes, Tranquility contains an advanced life support system to recycle waste water for crew use and generate oxygen for the crew to breathe. The node also provides four berthing locations for more attached pressurised modules or crew transportation vehicles, in addition to the permanent berthing location for the station's Cupola. | ||||||
Cupola | 20A | 8 February 2010 | Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-130 | Europe (builder) USA (operator) |
[73] | |
The Cupola is an observatory module that provides ISS crew members with a direct view of robotic operations and docked spacecraft, as well as an observation point for watching the Earth. The module comes equipped with robotic workstations for operating the SSRMS and shutters to protect its windows from damage caused by micrometeorites. It features a 80-centimetre (31 in) round window, the largest window on the station. | ||||||
Rassvet (lit. dawn) (mini-research module 1) |
ULF4 | 14 May 2010 | Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-132 | Russia | [50] | |
Rassvet is being used for docking and cargo storage aboard the station. | ||||||
Leonardo (Permanent Multipurpose Module) |
ULF5 | 24 February 2011 | Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-133 | Italy (Builder) USA (Operator) |
[74][75][76] | |
The Leonardo PMM houses spare parts and supplies, allowing longer times between resupply missions and freeing space in other modules, particularly Columbus. The PMM was created by converting the Italian Leonardo Multi-Purpose Logistics Module into a module that could be permanently attached to the station. The arrival of the PMM module marked the completion of the US Orbital Segment. |
Launch schedule
Module | Assembly mission | Launch date | Launch system | Nation | Isolated view | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nauka (lit. 'science') (Multipurpose Laboratory Module) |
3R | May 2012[77] | Proton-M | Russia | [50][78] | |
The MLM will be Russia's primary research module as part of the ISS and will be used for general microgravity experiments, docking, and cargo logistics. The module provides a crew work and rest area, and will be equipped with a backup attitude control system that can be used to control the station's attitude. Based on the current assembly schedule, the arrival of Nauka will complete construction of the Russian Orbital Segment and it will be the last major component added to the station. |
Cancelled modules
Several modules planned for the station have been cancelled over the course of the ISS programme, whether for budgetary reasons, because the modules became unnecessary, or following a redesign of the station after the 2003 Columbia disaster. The cancelled modules include:
- The US Centrifuge Accommodations Module for Science experiments, not people, in varying levels of artificial gravity.[79]
- The US Habitation Module, which would have served as the station's living quarters. The sleep stations are now spread throughout the station.[80]
- The US Interim Control Module and ISS Propulsion Module were intended to replace functions of Zvezda in case of a launch failure.[81]
- The Russian Universal Docking Module, to which the cancelled Russian Research modules and spacecraft would have docked.[82]
- The Russian Science Power Platform would have provided the Russian Orbital Segment with a power supply independent of the ITS solar arrays.[82]
- Two Russian Research Modules that were planned to be used for scientific research.[83]
Unpressurised elements
The ISS features a large number of external components that do not require pressurization. The largest such component is the Integrated Truss Structure (ITS), to which the station's main solar arrays and thermal radiators are mounted.[20] The ITS consists of ten separate segments forming a structure 108.5 m (356 ft) long.[3]
The ITS serves as a base for the main remote manipulator system called the Mobile Servicing System (MSS). This consists of the Mobile Base System (MBS), the Canadarm2, and the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator. The MBS rolls along rails built into some of the ITS segments to allow the arm to reach all parts of the US segment of the station.[84] The MSS had its reach increased by an Enhanced Orbiter Boom Sensor System, installed by Astronauts in EVA during the STS-134 mission in May, 2011. To gain access to the extreme extents of the Russian Segment the crew also placed a PDGF to the forward docking section of Zarya, so that the SSRMS may inchworm itself onto that point[85]
Two other remote manipulator systems are present in the station's final configuration. The European Robotic Arm, which will service the Russian Orbital Segment, will be launched alongside the Multipurpose Laboratory Module.[86] The Japanese Experiment Module's Remote Manipulator System(JFM RMS) , which services the JEM Exposed Facility,[87] was launched on STS-124 and is attached to the JEM Pressurised Module. In addition to these robotic arms, there are two Russian Strela cargo cranes used for moving spacewalking cosmonauts and parts around the exterior of the Russian Orbital Segment.[88]
The station in its complete form has several smaller external components, such as the three External Stowage Platforms (ESPs), launched on STS-102, STS-114 and STS-118 as well as four ExPrESS Logistics Carriers (ELCs). ELCs 1 and 2 were delivered on STS-129 in November 2009. ELC 4 was installed on February 2011 by STS-133 and ELC 3 by STS-134 in May 2011.[50][89] These platforms will also allow experiments to be deployed and conducted in the vacuum of space, such as MISSE, the STP-H3 and the Robotic Refuelling Mission (RRM), providing the necessary electricity and computing to process experimental data locally. The platforms' primary function is to support Orbital Replacement Units (ORUs). ORUs are key elements of the ISS that can be readily replaced when the unit either passes its design life or fails. Examples of ORUs are: Pumps, Storage Tanks, Controller Boxes, Antennas, Battery Units. Such units are replaced either by Astronauts during EVA or by the SPDM Arm.
While spare parts/ORUs were routinely brought up and down during the ISS life time via Space Shuttle resupply missions, there was a heavy emphasis once the Station was considered complete. Several Shuttle missions were dedicated to the delivery of ORUs, including STS-129,[90] STS-133[91] and STS-134.[92]
To date only one other mode of transportation of ORUs was utilised by the station, the Japanese cargo vessel HTV-2 delivered an FHRC and CTC-2 via its Exposed Pallet (EP).[93]
There are also smaller exposure facilities mounted directly to laboratory modules: the JEM Exposed Facility serves as an external 'porch' for the Japanese Experiment Module complex,[94] and a facility on the European Columbus laboratory provides power and data connections for experiments such as the European Technology Exposure Facility[95][96] and the Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space.[97] A remote sensing instrument, SAGE III-ISS, is due to be delivered to the station in 2014 aboard a Dragon capsule.[98]
The largest such scientific payload externally mounted to the ISS is the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS), a particle physics experiment, was launched on STS-134 in May 2011, and mounted externally on the ITS. The AMS will measure cosmic rays and look for evidence of dark matter and antimatter.[99]
Power supply
Photovoltaic (PV) arrays power the ISS. The Russian segment of the station, like the space shuttle and most aircraft, uses 28 volt DC partly provided by four solar arrays mounted directly to Zarya and Zvezda. The rest of the station uses 130–180 V DC from the US PV array.[20]
The US solar arrays are arranged as four wing pairs, with each wing producing nearly 32.8 kW.[20] These arrays normally track the sun to maximise power generation. Each array is about 375 m2 (450 yd2) in area and 58 metres (63 yd) long. In the complete configuration, the solar arrays track the sun by rotating the alpha gimbal once per orbit while the beta gimbal follows slower changes in the angle of the sun to the orbital plane. The Night Glider mode aligns the solar arrays parallel to the ground at night to reduce the significant aerodynamic drag at the station's relatively low orbital altitude.[100]
The station uses rechargeable nickel-hydrogen batteries for continuous power during the 35 minutes of every 90 minute orbit that it is eclipsed by the Earth. The batteries are recharged on the day side of the earth. They have a 6.5 year lifetime (over 37,000 charge/discharge cycles) and will be regularly replaced over the anticipated 20-year life of the station.[101]
Power is stabilised and distributed at 160 V DC and converted to the user-required 124 V DC. The higher distribution voltage allows smaller, lighter conductors. The two station segments share power with converters, essential since the Columbia disaster forced the cancellation of the Russian Science Power Platform and Jaxa centrifuge modules.[102][103]
Orbit control
The ISS is maintained in a nearly circular orbit with a minimum mean altitude of 278 km (173 mi) and a maximum of 460 km (286 mi). It travels at an average speed of 27,724 kilometres (17,227 mi) per hour, and completes 15.7 orbits per day.[21] The normal maximum altitude is 425 km (264 mi) to allow Nasa Shuttle rendezvous missions. It is likely that, with the retirement of the shuttle, the nominal orbit of the space station will be raised in altitude.[104] As the ISS constantly loses altitude because of a slight atmospheric drag, it needs to be boosted to a higher altitude several times each year.[31][105] This boost can be performed by the station's two main engines on the Zvezda service module, a docked space shuttle, a Progress resupply vessel, or by ESA's ATV. It takes approximately two orbits (three hours) for the boost to a higher altitude to be completed.[105]
In December 2008 NASA signed an agreement with the Ad Astra Rocket Company which may result in the testing on the ISS of a VASIMR plasma propulsion engine.[106] This technology could allow station-keeping to be done more economically than at present.[107][108] The station's navigational position and velocity, or state vector, is independently established using the US Global Positioning System (GPS) and a combination of state vector updates from Russian Ground Sites and the Russian GLONASS system.
The Russian orbital segment handles Guidance, Navigation & Control for the entire Station.[109] Initially, Zarya, the first module of the station, controlled the station until a short time after the Russian service module Zvezda docked and was transferred control. Zvezda contains the ESA built DMS-R Data Management System.[110] The attitude (orientation) of the station is independently determined by a set of sun, star and horizon sensors on Zvezda and the US GPS with antennas on the S0 truss and a receiver processor in the US lab. The attitude knowledge is propagated between updates by rate sensors.[23] Attitude control is maintained by either of two mechanisms; normally, a system of four control moment gyroscopes (CMGs) keeps the station oriented, with Destiny forward of Unity, the P truss on the port side, and Rassvet on the Earth-facing (nadir) side. Once, during Expedition 10,[111] an incorrect command was sent to the station's computer, and the CMG system became 'saturated' (when the set of CMGs exceed their operational range or cannot track a series of rapid movements[112]) Attitude control was automatically taken over by the Russian Attitude Control System thrusters for about one orbit, using about 14 kilograms of propellant before the fault was noticed and fixed. Thrusters are deactivated during EVA's for crew safety. When a space shuttle or Soyuz is docked to the station, it can also be used to maintain station attitude such as for troubleshooting. Shuttle control was used exclusively during installation of the S3/S4 truss, which provides electrical power and data interfaces for station's electronics.[113]
Communications
Radio communications provide telemetry and scientific data links between the station and Mission Control Centres. Radio links are also used during rendezvous and docking procedures and for audio and video communication between crewmembers, flight controllers and family members. As a result, the ISS is equipped with internal and external communication systems used for different purposes.[114]
The Russian Orbital Segment communicates directly with the ground via the Lira antenna mounted to Zvezda.[23][115] The Lira antenna also has the capability to use the Luch data relay satellite system.[23] This system, used for communications with Mir, fell into disrepair during the 1990s, and as a result is no longer in use,[17][23][116] although two new Luch satellites—Luch-5A and Luch-5B—are planned for launch in 2011 to restore the operational capability of the system.[117] Another Russian communications system is the Voskhod-M, which enables internal telephone communications between Zvezda, Zarya, Pirs, Poisk and the USOS, and also provides a VHF radio link to ground control centres via antennas on Zvezda's exterior.[118]
The US Orbital Segment (USOS) makes use of two separate radio links mounted in the Z1 truss structure: the S band (used for audio) and Ku band (used for audio, video and data) systems. These transmissions are routed via the US Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) in geostationary orbit, which allows for almost continuous real-time communications with NASA's Mission Control Center (MCC-H) in Houston.[18][23][114] Data channels for the Canadarm2, European Columbus laboratory and Japanese Kibō modules are routed via the S band and Ku band systems, although the European Data Relay Satellite System and a similar Japanese system will eventually complement the TDRSS in this role.[18][119] Communications between modules are carried on an internal digital wireless network.[120]
UHF radio is used by astronauts and cosmonauts conducting EVAs. UHF is employed by other spacecraft that dock to or undock from the station, such as Soyuz, Progress, HTV, ATV and the Space Shuttle (except the shuttle also makes use of the S band and Ku band systems via TDRSS), to receive commands from Mission Control and ISS crewmembers.[23] Automated spacecraft are fitted with their own communications equipment; the ATV uses a laser attached to the spacecraft and equipment attached to Zvezda, known as the Proximity Communications Equipment, to accurately dock to the station.[121][122]
As a promotional outreach and for stress relief, crew may use their spare time, or officially scheduled times, to talk to amateur radio operators and groups, such as schoolchildren using amateur radio equipment on-board.[123] Using some basic amateur radio contact techniques and equipment, anyone can speak one-to-one with crew on-board the ISS, work schedules permitting.
Computers
The international space station is equipped with approximately 100 IBM and Lenovo ThinkPad model A31 and T61P laptop computers. Each computer is a commercial off-the-shelf purchase which is then modified for safety and operation including updates to connectors, cooling and power to accommodate the station's 28V DC power system and weightless environment. As of September 2000, the ThinkPad is the only laptop certified for long duration flight aboard the ISS though Mac and other laptop computers have been used aboard the ISS for specific experiments.[124] All laptops aboard the ISS are connected to the station's WLAN via wifi and are connected to the ground at 3Mbps up and 10Mbps down, comparable to home DSL connection speeds.[125]
Life support
The ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) provides or controls atmospheric pressure, fire detection and suppression, oxygen levels, waste management and water supply. The highest priority for the ECLSS is the ISS atmosphere, but the system also collects, processes, and stores waste and water produced and used by the crew—a process that recycles fluid from the sink, toilet, and condensation from the air. The Elektron system aboard Zvezda and a similar system in Destiny generate oxygen aboard the station.[126] The crew has a backup option in the form of bottled oxygen and Solid Fuel Oxygen Generation (SFOG) canisters.[127] Carbon dioxide is removed from the air by the Vozdukh system in Zvezda. Other by-products of human metabolism, such as methane from the intestines and ammonia from sweat, are removed by activated charcoal filters.[127]
The atmosphere on board the ISS is similar to the Earth's.[128] Normal air pressure on the ISS is 101.3 kPa (14.7 psi);[129] the same as at sea level on Earth. An Earth-like atmosphere offers benefits for crew comfort, and is much safer than the alternative, a pure oxygen atmosphere, because of the increased risk of a fire such as that responsible for the deaths of the Apollo 1 crew.[130]
Microgravity
Gravity is the only significant force acting upon the ISS, which is in constant freefall. This state of freefall, or perceived weightlessness, is not perfect however, being disturbed by four separate effects:[131]
- The drag resulting from the residual atmosphere. When the ISS enters the earth's shadow, the main solar panels are rotated to minimize this aerodynamic drag, helping reduce orbital decay.
- Vibratory acceleration caused by mechanical systems and the crew on board the ISS.
- Orbital corrections by the on-board gyroscopes or thrusters.
- The spatial separation from the real centre of mass of the ISS. Any part of the ISS not at the exact center of mass will tend to follow its own orbit. That is, parts on the underside, closer to the earth are pulled harder, towards the earth. Conversely, parts on the top of the station, further from earth, try to fling off into space. However, as each point is physically part of the station, this is impossible, and so each component is subject to small forces which keep them attached to the station as it orbits.[131] This is also called the tidal force.
Researchers are investigating the effect of the station's near-weightless environment on the evolution, development, growth and internal processes of plants and animals. In response to some of this data, NASA wants to investigate microgravity's effects on the growth of three-dimensional, human-like tissues, and the unusual protein crystals that can be formed in space.[12]
The investigation of the physics of fluids in microgravity will allow researchers to model the behaviour of fluids better. Because fluids can be almost completely combined in microgravity, physicists investigate fluids that do not mix well on Earth. In addition, an examination of reactions that are slowed by low gravity and temperatures will give scientists a deeper understanding of superconductivity.[12]
The study of materials science is an important ISS research activity, with the objective of reaping economic benefits through the improvement of techniques used on the ground.[132] Other areas of interest include the effect of the low gravity environment on combustion, through the study of the efficiency of burning and control of emissions and pollutants. These findings may improve our knowledge about energy production, and lead to economic and environmental benefits. Future plans are for the researchers aboard the ISS to examine aerosols, ozone, water vapour, and oxides in Earth's atmosphere, as well as cosmic rays, cosmic dust, antimatter, and dark matter in the universe.[12]
Sightings
Before sunrise or after sunset, the ISS can appear to observers on the ground, with the naked eye as a slow moving, bright, white dot, slowly crossing the sky in 2 to 5 minutes. This happens when after sunset or before sunrise the ISS is still sunlit, which is typically the case up to a few hours after sunset or before sunrise.[133] Because of its size, the ISS is the brightest man made object in the sky, with an approximate brightness of magnitude -4 when overhead, similar to Venus. The ISS can also produce flares as sunlight glints off reflective surfaces as it orbits of up to 8 or 16 times the brightness of Venus.[134] The ISS is also visible during broad daylight conditions, albeit with much much more effort.
Tools are provided by a number of websites such as Heavens-Above as well as smartphone applications that use the known orbital data and the observer's longitude and latitude to predict when the ISS will be visible (weather permitting), where the station will appear to rise to the observer, the altitude above the horizon it will reach and the duration of the pass before the station disappears to the observer either by setting below the horizon or entering into Earth's shadow.[135][136][137][138]
The ISS orbits at an inclination of 51.6 degrees to Earth's equator, necessary to ensure that Russian Soyuz and Progress spacecraft launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome may be safely launched to reach the station.[139][140] While this orbit makes the station visible from 95% of the inhabited land on Earth, it is not visible from extreme northern or southern latitudes.[139]
Life on board
Crew schedule
The time zone used on board the ISS is Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). The windows are covered at night hours to give the impression of darkness because the station experiences 16 sunrises and sunsets a day. During visiting space shuttle missions, the ISS crew will mostly follow the shuttle's Mission Elapsed Time (MET), which is a flexible time zone based on the launch time of the shuttle mission.[141][142] Because the sleeping periods between the UTC time zone and the MET usually differ, the ISS crew often has to adjust its sleeping pattern before the space shuttle arrives and after it leaves to shift from one time zone to the other in a practice known as sleep shifting.[143]
A typical day for the crew begins with a wake-up at 06:00, followed by post-sleep activities and a morning inspection of the station. The crew then eats breakfast and takes part in a daily planning conference with Mission Control before starting work at around 08:10. The first scheduled exercise of the day follows, after which the crew continues work until 13:05. Following a one-hour lunch break, the afternoon consists of more exercise and work before the crew carries out its pre-sleep activities beginning at 19:30, including dinner and a crew conference. The scheduled sleep period begins at 21:30. In general, the crew works ten hours per day on a weekday, and five hours on Saturdays, with the rest of the time their own for relaxation or work catch-up.[144]
Food and drink
Most of the food eaten by station crews is stored frozen, refrigerated or canned. Menus are prepared by the astronauts, with the help of a dietitian, before the astronauts' flight to the station.[145] As the sense of taste is reduced in orbit because of fluid shifting to the head, spicy food is a favourite of many crews.[146] Each crewmember has individual food packages and cooks them using the onboard galley, which features two food warmers, a refrigerator, and a water dispenser that provides both heated and unheated water.[147] Drinks are provided in dehydrated powder form and are mixed with water before consumption.[145][147] Drinks and soups are sipped from plastic bags with straws, while solid food is eaten with a knife and fork, which are attached to a tray with magnets to prevent them from floating away. Any food that does float away, including crumbs, must be collected to prevent it from clogging up the station's air filters and other equipment.[145]
Exercise
The most significant adverse effects of long-term weightlessness are muscle atrophy and deterioration of the skeleton, or spaceflight osteopenia. Other significant effects include fluid redistribution, a slowing of the cardiovascular system, decreased production of red blood cells, balance disorders, and a weakening of the immune system. Lesser symptoms include loss of body mass, nasal congestion, sleep disturbance, excess flatulence, and puffiness of the face. These effects begin to reverse quickly upon return to the Earth.[35]
To prevent some of these adverse physiological effects, the station is equipped with two treadmills (including the COLBERT), the aRED (advanced Resistive Exercise Device) which enables various weightlifting exercises, and a stationary bicycle; each astronaut spends at least two hours per day exercising on the equipment.[146][147] Astronauts use bungee cords to strap themselves to the treadmill.[148] Researchers believe that exercise is a good countermeasure for the bone and muscle density loss that occurs when humans live for a long time without gravity.[149]
Sleeping in space
The station provides crew quarters for each member of the expedition's crew, with two 'sleep stations' in the Zvezda and four more installed in Harmony.[150][151] The American quarters are private, approximately person-sized soundproof booths. The Russian crew quarters include a small window, but don't provide the same amount of ventilation or block the same amount of noise as their American counterparts. A crewmember can sleep in a crew quarter in a tethered sleeping bag, listen to music, use a laptop, and store personal items in a large drawer or in nets attached to the module's walls. The module also provides a reading lamp, a shelf and a desktop.[145][146][147] Visiting crews have no allocated sleep module, and attach a sleeping bag to an available space on a wall—it is possible to sleep floating freely through the station, but this is generally avoided because of the possibility of bumping into sensitive equipment.[152] It is important that crew accommodations be well ventilated; otherwise, astronauts can wake up oxygen-deprived and gasping for air, because a bubble of their own exhaled carbon dioxide has formed around their heads.[146]
Hygiene
The ISS does not feature a shower, although it was planned as part of the now cancelled Habitation Module. Instead, crewmembers wash using a water jet and wet wipes, with soap dispensed from a toothpaste tube-like container. Crews are also provided with rinseless shampoo and edible toothpaste to save water.[152]
There are two space toilets on the ISS, both of Russian design, located in Zvezda and Tranquility.[147] These Waste and Hygiene Compartments use a fan-driven suction system similar to the Space Shuttle Waste Collection System. Astronauts first fasten themselves to the toilet seat, which is equipped with spring-loaded restraining bars to ensure a good seal.[146] A lever operates a powerful fan and a suction hole slides open: the air stream carries the waste away. Solid waste is collected in individual bags which are stored in an aluminium container. Full containers are transferred to Progress spacecraft for disposal.[147][153] Liquid waste is evacuated by a hose connected to the front of the toilet, with anatomically correct “urine funnel adapters” attached to the tube so both men and women can use the same toilet. Waste is collected and transferred to the Water Recovery System, where it is recycled back into drinking water.[145]
Station operations
Expeditions
Each permanent station crew is given a sequential expedition number. Expeditions have an average duration of half a year, and they commence following the official handover of the station from one Expedition commander to another. Expeditions 1 through 6 consisted of three person crews, but the Columbia accident led to a reduction to two crew members for Expeditions 7 to 12. Expedition 13 saw the restoration of the station crew to three, and the station has been permanently staffed as such since. While only three crew members are permanently on the station, several expeditions, such as Expedition 16, have consisted of up to six astronauts or cosmonauts, who are flown to and from the station on separate flights.[154][155]
On 27 May 2009, Expedition 20 began. Expedition 20 was the first ISS crew of six. Before the expansion of the living volume and capabilities from STS-115 the station could only host a crew of three. Expedition 20s crew was lifted to the station in two separate Soyuz-TMA flights launched at two different times (each Soyuz-TMA can hold only three people): Soyuz TMA-14 on 26 March 2009 and Soyuz TMA-15 on 27 May 2009. However, the station would not be permanently occupied by six crew members all year. For example, when the Expedition 20 crew (Roman Romanenko, Frank De Winne and Bob Thirsk) returned to Earth in November 2009, for a period of about two weeks only two crew members (Jeff Williams and Max Surayev) were aboard. This increased to five in early December, when Oleg Kotov, Timothy Creamer and Soichi Noguchi arrived on Soyuz TMA-17. It decreased to three when Williams and Surayev departed in March 2010, and finally returned to six in April 2010 with the arrival of Soyuz TMA-18, carrying Aleksandr Skvortsov, Mikhail Korniyenko and Tracy Caldwell Dyson.[154][155] Expedition size may be increased to seven crew members, the number originally planned.[156]
The International Space Station is the most-visited spacecraft in the history of space flight. As of 15 December 2010, it had received 297 visitors (196 different people).[26][157] Mir had 137 visitors (104 different people).[17]
Visiting spacecraft
Spacecraft (or 'visiting vehicles') from four different space agencies visit the ISS, serving a variety of purposes. The Automated Transfer Vehicle from the European Space Agency, the Russian Roskosmos Progress spacecraft and the HTV from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency have provided resupply services to the station. In addition, Russia supplies a Soyuz spacecraft used for crew rotation and emergency evacuation, which is replaced every six months. Finally, the US services the ISS through its Space Shuttle programme, providing resupply missions, assembly and logistics flights, and crew rotation. As of 9 March 2011, there have been 25 Soyuz, 41 Progress, 2 ATV, 2 HTV and 35 space shuttle flights to the station.[2] Expeditions require, on average, 2 722 kg of supplies, and as of 9 March 2011, crews had consumed a total of around 22 000 meals.[2] Soyuz crew rotation flights and Progress resupply flights visit the station on average two and three times respectively each year,[158] with the ATV and HTV planned to visit annually from 2010 onwards.
Following the retirement of the Space Shuttle, a number of other spacecraft are expected to fly to the station. Two, the Orbital Sciences Cygnus and SpaceX Dragon, will fly under NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services and Commercial Resupply Services contracts, delivering cargo to the station until at least 2015.[159][160]
Docking
Spacecraft from Russia and Europe are able to launch, fly and dock themselves without human intervention. This includes both Russian manned and unmanned spacecraft. American craft are manually docked, while Japanese craft are berthed with the use of manually controlled robot arms. Russian and European Supply craft can remain at the ISS for 6 months,[161][162] allowing great flexibility in crew time for loading and unloading of supplies and trash. Japanese spacecraft berth for 1–2 months. American space shuttles can remain in space for up to 17 days, the longest docking being 11 days.
The American Manual approach to docking allows greater initial flexibility and less complexity. The downside to this mode of operation is that each mission becomes unique and requires specialized training and planning, making the process more labor-intensive and expensive. The Russians pursued an automated methodology that used the crew in override or monitoring roles. Although the initial development costs were high, the system has become very reliable with standardizations that provide significant cost benefits in repetitive routine operations.[163] The Russian approach allows assembly of space stations orbiting other worlds in preparation for manned missions. The Nauka module of the ISS will be used in the 12th Russian(/Soviet) space station, OPSEK, whose main goal is supporting manned deep space exploration.
Currently docked
As of 10 July 2011, there are 5 spacecraft docked with the ISS. The current docking of STS-135 is last time that Space Shuttle will dock with the ISS. All dates and times are UTC.
Spacecraft | Mission | Docking port | Docked | Undocking | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Soyuz TMA-21 | Expedition 27/28 | Poisk | 6 April 2011 23:09 | September 2011 | [164] | |
Progress M-10M | Progress 42 Cargo | Pirs | 29 April 2011 14:29 | 25 October 2011 | [165] | |
Soyuz TMA-02M | Expedition 28/29 | Rassvet | 9 June 2011 21:18 | November 2011 | [166] | |
Progress M-11M | Progress 43 Cargo | Zvezda aft. | 23 June 2011 07:37 | 29 August 2011 | [167] | |
Atlantis | STS-135/ULF7 | Harmony forward | 10 July 2011 17:07 | 19 July 2011 | [168] |
From 26 February 2011 to 7 March 2011, during the docked phase of STS-133, four of the governmental partners (USA, ESA, Japan and Russia) had their current visiting vehicles (Space Shuttle, ATV, HTV, Progress and Soyuz) docked at the ISS at one time, the only time this has happened to date.[169]
Docking schedule
All dates are UTC. Dates are the earliest possible dates and may change. Forward ports are at the front of the station according to it's normal direction of travel and orientation (attitude). Aft is at the rear of the station, used by spacecraft boosting the station's orbit. Nadir is closest the earth, Zenith is on top.
Spacecraft | Launch | Mission | Planned Docking (UTC) | Docking port | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Progress M-12M | 30 August 2011 | Progress 44 Cargo | 1 September 2011 | Zvezda aft | [167] | |
Soyuz TMA-22 | 30 September 2011. | Expedition 29/30 | 2 October 2011 | Poisk | ||
Dragon C3 | 8 October 2011 | Dragon Demo | 10 October 2011 | Harmony nadir | ||
Progress M-13M | 26 October 2011 | Progress 45 Cargo | 28 October 2011 | Pirs | [167] | |
Dragon C4 | 7 December 2011 | Dragon 1 Cargo | 9 December 2011 | TBD | ||
Cygnus 1 | 14 December 2011 | Cygnus 1 Cargo | 16 December 2011 | TBD | ||
Progress M-14M | 27 December 2011 | Progress 46 Cargo | 29 December 2011 | Pirs | [167] | |
Soyuz TMA-03M | December 2011. | Expedition 30/31 | December 2011 | Rassvet | [167] | |
White Stork 3 | 12 January 2012 | HTV-3 Cargo | 17 January 2012 | Harmony nadir | ||
Edoardo Amaldi | 29 February 2012 | ATV-3 Cargo | 7 March 2012 | Zvezda aft | [170] | |
Soyuz TMA-04M | March 2012. | Expedition 31/32 | March 2012 | Poisk | [167] |
Mission control centres
The components of the ISS are operated and monitored by their respective space agencies at control centres across the globe, including:
- Roskosmos's Mission Control Center at Korolyov, Moscow Oblast, controls the Russian Orbital Segment which handles Guidance, Navigation & Control for the entire Station.,[109][110] in addition to individual Soyuz and Progress missions.[23]
- ESA's ATV Control Centre, at the Toulouse Space Centre (CST) in Toulouse, France, controls flights of the unmanned European Automated Transfer Vehicle.[23]
- JAXA's JEM Control Centre and HTV Control Centre at Tsukuba Space Centre (TKSC) in Tsukuba, Japan, are responsible for operating the Japanese Experiment Module complex and all flights of the 'White Stork' HTV Cargo spacecraft, respectively.[23]
- NASA's Mission Control Center at Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, serves as the primary control facility for the US segment of the ISS and also controls the Space Shuttle missions that visit the station.[23]
- NASA's Payload Operations and Integration Center at Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, serves as the centre that coordinates all payload operations in the US Segment.[23]
- ESA's Columbus Control Centre at the German Aerospace Centre (DLR) in Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, controls the European Columbus research laboratory.[23]
- CSA's MSS Control at Saint-Hubert, Quebec, Canada, controls and monitors the Mobile Servicing System, or Canadarm2.[23]
Utilisation rights
The Russian part of the station is operated and controlled by the Russian Federation's space agency and provides Russia with the right to nearly one-half of the crew time for the ISS. The allocation of remaining crew time (three to four crew members of the total permanent crew of six) and hardware within the other sections of the station has been assigned as follows:
- Columbus: 51% for the ESA, 46.7% for NASA, and 2.3% for CSA.[24]
- Kibō: 51% for the JAXA, 46.7% for NASA, and 2.3% for CSA.[119]
- Destiny: 97.7% for NASA and 2.3% for CSA.[171]
- Crew time, electrical power and rights to purchase supporting services (such as data upload and download and communications) are divided 76.6% for NASA, 12.8% for JAXA, 8.3% for ESA, and 2.3% for CSA.[24][119][171]
Maintenance
Unexpected problems and failures have impacted the station's assembly time-line and work schedules leading to periods of reduced capabilities.
During STS-120 on 2007, following the relocation of the P6 truss and solar arrays, it was noted during the redeployment of the array that it had become torn and was not deploying properly.[172] An EVA was carried out by Scott Parazynski, assisted by Douglas Wheelock, the men took extra precautions to reduce the risk of electric shock, as the repairs were carried out with the solar array exposed to sunlight.[173] The issues with the array were followed in the same year by problems with the starboard Solar Alpha Rotary Joint (SARJ), which rotates the arrays on the starboard side of the station. Excessive vibration and high-current spikes in the array drive motor were noted, resulting in a decision to substantially curtail motion of the starboard SARJ until the cause was understood. Inspections during EVAs on STS-120 and STS-123 showed extensive contamination from metallic shavings and debris in the large drive gear and confirmed damage to the large metallic race ring at the heart of the joint, and so the joint was locked to prevent further damage.[174] Repairs to the joint were carried out during STS-126 with lubrication of both joints and the replacement 11 of 12 trundle bearings on the joint.[175][176]
More recently, problems have been noted with the station's engines and cooling. In 2009, the engines on Zvezda were issued an incorrect command which caused excessive vibrations to propagate throughout the station structure which persisted for over two minutes.[177] While no damage to the station was immediately reported, some components may have been stressed beyond their design limits. Further analysis confirmed that the station was unlikely to have suffered any structural damage, and it appears that "structures will still meet their normal lifetime capability".[178] 2009 also saw damage to the S1 radiator, one of the components of the station's cooling system. The problem was first noticed in Soyuz imagery in September 2008, but was not thought to be serious.[179] The imagery showed that the surface of one sub-panel has peeled back from the underlying central structure, possibly due to micro-meteoroid or debris impact. It is also known that a Service Module thruster cover, jettisoned during an EVA in 2008, had struck the S1 radiator, but its effect, if any, has not been determined. On 15 May 2009 the damaged radiator panel's ammonia tubing was mechanically shut off from the rest of the cooling system by the computer-controlled closure of a valve. The same valve was used immediately afterwards to vent the ammonia from the damaged panel, eliminating the possibility of an ammonia leak from the cooling system via the damaged panel.[179]
Early on 1 August 2010, a failure in cooling Loop A (starboard side), one of two external cooling loops, left the station with only half of its normal cooling capacity and zero redundancy in some systems.[180][181][182] The problem appeared to be in the ammonia pump module that circulates the ammonia cooling fluid. Several subsystems, including two of the four CMGs, were shut down.
Planned operations on the ISS were interrupted through a series of EVAs to address the cooling system issue. A first EVA on 7 August 2010, to replace the failed pump module, was not fully completed due to an ammonia leak in one of four quick-disconnects. A second EVA on 11 August successfully removed the failed pump module.[183][184] A third EVA was required to restore Loop A to normal functionality.[185][186]
The USOS's cooling system is largely built by the American company Boeing,[187] which is also the manufacturer of the failed pump.[188]
Safety aspects
Orbital debris
At the low altitudes at which the ISS orbits there is a variety of space debris,[189] consisting of many different objects including entire spent rocket stages, dead satellites, explosion fragments—including materials from anti-satellite weapon tests, paint flakes, slag from solid rocket motors, coolant released by RORSAT nuclear powered satellites and some of the 480,000,000 small needles from the American military Project West Ford.[190] These objects, in addition to natural micrometeoroids,[191] are a significant threat to life for the crew, and the stations structure, despite their small size, because of their kinetic energy and direction in relation to the station.[192][193] Debris poses a risk to spacewalking crew, as such objects could puncture their spacesuits, causing them to depressurise.[194]
Space debris objects are tracked remotely from the ground, and the station crew can be notified of many objects with sufficient size to cause damage on impact. This allows for a Debris Avoidance Manoeuvre (DAM) to be conducted, which uses thrusters on the Russian Orbital Segment to alter the station's orbital altitude, avoiding the debris. DAMs are not uncommon, taking place if computational models show the debris will approach within a certain threat distance. Eight DAMs had been performed prior to March 2009,[195] the first seven between October 1999 and May 2003.[196] Usually the orbit is raised by one or two kilometres by means of an increase in orbital velocity of the order of 1 m/s. Unusually there was a lowering of 1.7 km on 27 August 2008, the first such lowering for 8 years.[196][197] There were two DAMs in 2009, on 22 March and 17 July.[198] If a threat from orbital debris is identified too late for a DAM to be safely conducted, the station crew close all the hatches aboard the station and retreat into their Soyuz spacecraft, so that they would be able to evacuate in the event it was damaged by the debris. This partial station evacuation has occurred twice, on 13 March 2009 and 28 June 2011.[192]
Space environment
The space environment is hostile to life. Unprotected presence in space is characterised by an intense radiation field (consisting primarily of protons and other subatomic charged particles from the solar wind, in addition to cosmic rays), high vacuum, extreme temperatures, and microgravity.[199] Some simple forms of life[200] including Tardigrades[201] can survive in this environment in a desiccated state.
The ISS is partially protected from this environment by the Earth's magnetic field. From an average distance of about 70,000 km, depending on Solar activity, the magnetosphere begins to deflect solar wind around the Earth and ISS. However, solar flares are still a hazard to the crew, who may receive only a few minutes warning. The crew of Expedition 10 took shelter as a precaution in 2005 in a more heavily shielded part of the ROS designed for this purpose during the initial 'proton storm' of an X-3 class solar flare.[202][203]
Without the protection of the Earth's atmosphere, astronauts are exposed to higher levels of radiation from a steady flux of cosmic rays. Subatomic charged particles, primarily protons from solar wind, penetrate living tissue and damage DNA. The station's crews are exposed to about 1 millisievert of radiation each day, which is about the same as someone would get in a year on Earth, from natural sources.[204] This results in a higher risk of astronauts' developing cancer. High levels of radiation can cause damage to the chromosomes of lymphocytes. These cells are central to the immune system and so any damage to them could contribute to the lowered immunity experienced by astronauts. Over time lowered immunity results in the spread of infection between crew members, especially in such confined areas. Radiation has also been linked to a higher incidence of cataracts in astronauts. Protective shielding and protective drugs may lower the risks to an acceptable level, but data is scarce and longer-term exposure will result in greater risks.[35]
Despite efforts to improve radiation shielding on the ISS compared to previous stations such as Mir, radiation levels within the station have not been vastly reduced, and it is thought that further technological advancement will be required to make long-duration human spaceflight further into the Solar System a possibility.[204] Large, acute doses of radiation from Coronal Mass Ejection can cause radiation sickness and can be fatal. Without the protection of the Earth's Magnetosphere, interplanetary manned missions are especially vulnerable.
The radiation levels experienced on ISS are about 5 times greater than those experienced by airline passengers and crew. The Earth's electromagnetic field provides almost the same level of protection against solar and other radiation in low Earth orbit as in the stratosphere. Airline passengers, however, experience this level of radiation for no more than 15 hours for the longest transcontinental flights. For example, on a 12 hour flight an airline passenger would experience 0.1 millisievert of radiation, or a rate of 0.2 millisieverts per day; only 1/5 the rate experienced by an astronaut in LEO.[205]
Anomalies
These incidents have led to periods of reduced capabilities and, in some cases, could have forced abandonment of the station for safety reasons, had these problems not been resolved.
An air leak from the USOS in 2004,[206] the venting of smoke from an Elektron oxygen generator in 2006,[207] and the failure of the computers in the ROS in 2007 during STS-117 which left the station without thruster, Elektron, Vozdukh and other environmental control system operations, the root cause of which was found to be condensation inside the electrical connectors leading to a short-circuit[citation needed].
Politics
Legal aspects
The ISS is a joint project of several space agencies: the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Russian Federal Space Agency (RSA), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and the European Space Agency (ESA).[22]
As a multinational project, the legal and financial aspects are complex. Issues of concern include the ownership of modules, station utilisation by participant nations, and responsibilities for station resupply. Obligations and rights are established by the Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). This international treaty was signed on 28 January 1998 by the primary nations involved in the Space Station project; the United States of America, Russia, Japan, Canada and eleven member states of the European Space Agency (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom).[24] A second layer of agreements was then achieved, called Memoranda of Understanding (MOU), between NASA and ESA, CSA, RKA and JAXA. These agreements are then further split, such as for the contractual obligations between nations, and trading of partners' rights and obligations.[24] Use of the Russian Orbital Segment is also negotiated at this level.[25]
In addition to these main intergovernmental agreements, Brazil originally joined the programme as a bilateral partner of the United States by a contract with NASA to supply hardware.[208] In return, NASA would provide Brazil with access to its ISS facilities on-orbit, as well as a flight opportunity for one Brazilian astronaut during the course of the ISS programme. However, due to cost issues, the subcontractor Embraer was unable to provide the promised ExPrESS pallet, and Brazil left the programme.[209] Italy has a similar contract with NASA to provide comparable services, although Italy also takes part in the programme directly via its membership in ESA.[210] The Chinese, who have their own space station, Project 921-2, scheduled for launch late in 2011, have reportedly expressed interest in the project, especially if it would be able to work with the RKA. Chinese manned spacecraft and space stations have Russian compatible docking systems. However, as of December 2010 China remains uninvolved.[211][212] The heads of both the South Korean and Indian space agency ISRO announced at the first plenary session of the 2009 International Astronautical Congress that their nations intend to join the ISS programme, with talks due to begin in 2010. The heads of agency also expressed support for extending ISS lifetime.[213] European countries not part of the programme will be allowed access to the station in a three-year trial period, ESA officials say.[214]
Station commander Yuri Malenchenko was married on his 3rd mission in space.
Costs
The cost estimates for the ISS range from 35 billion to 160 billion dollars.[28] ESA, estimates €100 billion for the entire station over 30 years.[27]
The NASA budget for 2007 estimates costs for the ISS (excluding shuttle costs) at $US25.6 billion for the years 1994 to 2005. NASA's annual contribution increase from 2010 to $US2.3 billion and is likely to remain at that level until 2017.
Based on costs incurred plus a projected $2.5 Billion per year from 2011–2017, NASA spending since 1993 not including shuttle spending comes to $US53 Billion. An additional 33 Shuttle assembly and supply flights equates to $35 Billion. With addition costs from development of the freedom station project precursor, NASA's contribution comes to approximately $US100 Billion.
ESA spending on a 30-year projected station lifespan is €8 billion. Consisting of Columbus development €1 Billion. ATV's First launch and development €1.35 Billion, subsequent launches €875 Million X 4 scheduled, Ariane-5 launch costs of €125 million each. ATV total costs €2.85 Billion.
JAXA Kibō $2.8 Billion, plus operating costs 350-400 Million annually. HTV development ¥68 billion, Plus HTV launch costs of about ¥ 250 billion.
Total costs for Kibō until 2010 ¥7,100 billion, consisting of development approximately ¥ 250 billion, Kibo laboratory equipment development cost about ¥450 billion, approximately ¥2,360 billion in costs and expenses of shuttle launches. Astronaut training, ground facilities, experiment-related expenses approximately 110 billion yen.
JAXA Annual costs since 2011 at about 400 billion yen, consisting of the operating costs (such as maintenance, astronaut training) about 90 billion yen, (experiment-related costs), about 40 billion yen, and HTV launches.
RSA costs are difficult to determine as substantial development costs of the Robotic Progress Cargoships, Manned/Robotic Soyuz spacecraft, and Proton Rockets used for module launches, are spread across previous Soviet rocket programmes. Cost of development for Module design such as DOS base blocks, life support, docking systems etc are spread across the budgets of the Salyut, Almaz, and MIR I and MIR II programmes. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin stated in Jan 2011 that the government will spend 115 billion rubles ($3.8 bln) on national space programmes in 2011, however this includes the entire space programme which will launch a spacecraft on average once per week during 2011.[215]
CSA spending over the last 20 years is estimated at $CA1.4 Billion. Including development of the Canadarm2 and SPDM.
Media
At the end of completion of the USOS in May 2011, media organizations such as msnbc[216] and Yahoo,[217] reported construction of the ISS station as a whole to be complete.[218] However, NASA's consolidated Launch manifest lists the Russian Laboratory module Nauka, as due for launch in May 2012 on a 3R Russian Proton Rocket.[219] Addition of the Russian multipurpose laboratory module with European robotic arm (ERA) will complete the station.
Criticism
Critics of the ISS contend that the time and money spent on the ISS could be better spent on other projects—whether they be robotic spacecraft missions, space exploration, investigations of problems on Earth, colonisation of Mars, or just tax savings.[29][30]
The research capabilities of the ISS have been criticised, particularly following the cancellation of the ambitious Centrifuge Accommodations Module, which, alongside other equipment cancellations, means scientific research performed on the station is generally limited to experiments which do not require any specialised apparatus. For example, in the first half of 2007, ISS research dealt primarily with human biological responses to living and working in space, covering topics like kidney stones, circadian rhythm, and the effects of cosmic rays on the nervous system.[220][221][222] Other criticisms hinge on the technical design of the ISS, including the high inclination of the station's orbit, which leads to a higher cost for US-based launches to the station.[223]
End of mission
As recently as 2009, NASA had stated plans to end the ISS programme and deorbit the ISS in early 2016.[224] this was in accordance with the then-President Bush's policy. President Obama announced new policy in 2010, extending the programme through 2020.[225]
All five ISS-participating space agencies had indicated in 2010 their desire to see the platform continue flying beyond 2015, but Europe struggled to agree on funding arrangements within its member states, until agreement was reached in March 2011.[226][227][228]
According to a 2009 report, RKK Energia is considering methods to remove from the station some modules of the Russian Orbital Segment when the end of mission is reached and use them as a basis for a new station, known as the Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex (OPSEK). The modules under consideration for removal from the current ISS include the Multipurpose Laboratory Module (MLM), currently scheduled to be launched at the end of 2011, with other Russian modules which are currently planned to be attached to the MLM until 2015, although still currently unfunded. Neither the MLM nor any additional modules attached to it would have reached the end of their useful lives in 2016 or 2020. The report presents a statement from an unnamed Russian engineer who believes that, based on the experience from Mir, a thirty-year life should be possible, except for micrometeorite damage, because the Russian modules have been built with on-orbit refurbishment in mind.[229]
Russia and ISS partners in a 2011 statement said that work is being done to make sure other modules can be used beyond 2015. So far, the partners have only manifested missions through about 2015. The first Russian module was launched in 1998, and the 30th anniversary of that module's launch has been chosen as a target date for certification of all components of the ISS.[226]
De-orbit
According to the Outer Space Treaty the US is legally responsible for all modules it has launched.[citation needed]
According to a Russian official in a BBC report. "(As) the primary integrator of the station (NASA) is responsible for a civilized end to the flight after the conclusion of the mission," "[The Americans] said they understood the issue, but did not go beyond that." To resolve the problem, Russian space officials are eyeing the European-built ATV spacecraft, which has a propulsion system powerful enough to guide the station towards a controlled destruction. But currently, the vehicle can only dock with the Russian segment, and would need significant modifications to implement the new plan.[229]
In ISS planning, NASA examined options including return to Earth via shuttle missions, natural orbital decay with random reentry similar to Skylab, boosting to a higher altitude and a controlled targeted de-orbit to a remote ocean area.[230]
NASA considered disassembly of the ISS too expensive, as the ISS (USOS) is not designed for disassembly and would require at least 27 shuttle missions.[231] Boosting to a higher orbit would only delay reentry, and reaching earth orbit escape velocity required new hardware as well as a high cost.
The technical feasibility of a controlled targeted deorbit into a remote ocean was found to be within the capability of the ISS, only with the US combining its resources with Russia.[230] At the time ISS was launched, the Russian Space Agency had experience from de-orbiting Salyut 4, 5, 6, and 7 space stations, while NASA's first intentional controlled de-orbit of a satellite would not occur for another two years.[232]
NASA currently has no spacecraft capable of de-orbiting the ISS at the time of decommissioning.[233]
While the entire USOS cannot be reused and will be discarded, final decisions are still to be made on which ROS modules will be used in OPSEK, and which modules will be discarded. Pirs module is to be de-orbited before the decommissioning of the ISS and Nauka will be re-used.[234]
See also
- Bigelow Commercial Space Station
- Rotating wheel space station
- Space stations and habitats in fiction
References
- ^ "NASA - The ISS to Date (03/09/2011)". Nasa.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ a b c d NASA (9 March 2011). "The ISS to Date". NASA. Retrieved 21 March 2011.
- ^ a b c d NASA (18 February 2010). "On-Orbit Elements" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 19 June 2010.
- ^ Chris Peat (18 June 2010). "ISS—Orbit Data". Heavens-Above.com. Retrieved 18 June 2010.
- ^ "STS-132 Press Kit" (PDF). NASA. 7 May 2010. Retrieved 19 June 2010.
- ^ "STS-133 FD 04 Execute Package" (PDF). NASA. 27 February 2011. Retrieved 27 February 2011.
- ^ "NASA — Facts and Figures — International Space Station". NASA. 21 March 2011. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- ^ Glenday, Craig (2010). Guinness world records, 2010 (2010 Bantam mass market ed. ed.). New York: Bantam Books. p. 13. ISBN 0553593374.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help) - ^ Smith, Marcia (27 April 2011). "ESA Formally Agrees to Continue ISS Through 2020". spacepolicyonline.com. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (11 March 2010). "Space station partners set 2028 as certification goal". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
- ^ a b c "International Space Station Overview". ShuttlePressKit.com. 3 June 1999. Retrieved 17 February 2009.
- ^ a b c d e "Fields of Research". NASA. 26 June 2007. Archived from the original on 25 March 2008.
{{cite web}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 23 January 2008 suggested (help) - ^ a b "Getting on Board". NASA. 26 June 2007. Archived from the original on 8 December 2007.
- ^ a b "ISS Research Program". NASA. Retrieved 27 February 2009.[dead link]
- ^ "We've Only Just Begun". NASA. 26 June 2008. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ "Expedition 28".[dead link]
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j David Harland (30 November 2004). The Story of Space Station Mir. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. ISBN 978-0-387-23011-5.
- ^ a b c d John E. Catchpole (17 June 2008). The International Space Station: Building for the Future. Springer-Praxis. ISBN 978-0387781440.
- ^ a b Kim Dismukes (4 April 2004). "Shuttle–Mir History/Background/How "Phase 1" Started". NASA. Retrieved 12 April 2007.
- ^ a b c d "Spread Your Wings, It's Time to Fly". NASA. 26 July 2006. Retrieved 21 September 2006.
- ^ a b NASA (15 December 2008). "Current ISS Tracking data". NASA. Retrieved 28 January 2009.
- ^ a b "Human Spaceflight and Exploration—European Participating States". European Space Agency (ESA). 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2009.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Gary Kitmacher (2006). Reference Guide to the International Space Station. Canada: Apogee Books. pp. 71–80. ISBN 978-1-894959-34-6. ISSN 1496-6921.
- ^ a b c d e f "ISS Intergovernmental Agreement". European Space Agency (ESA). 19 April 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2009.[dead link]
- ^ a b c "Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Russian Space Agency Concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station". NASA. 29 January 1998. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- ^ a b c "Nations Around the World Mark 10th Anniversary of International Space Station". NASA. 17 November 2008. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ a b "How Much Does It Cost?". European Space Agency (ESA). 9 August 2005. Retrieved 27 March 2008.
- ^ a b Alan Boyle (25 August 2006). "What's the cost of the space station?". MSNBC. Retrieved 30 September 2008.
- ^ a b Jim Wilson (December 2002). "Scientists Believe ISS Is Waste Of Money". Popular Mechanics. Hearst Corporation. Archived from the original on 10 February 2008. Retrieved 17 December 2009.
- ^ a b James P. Bagian; et al. (2001). Readiness Issues Related to Research in the Biological and Physical Sciences on the International Space Station. United States National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
{{cite book}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help) - ^ a b c James Oberg (2005). "International Space Station". World Book Online Reference Center. World Book, Inc. Retrieved 14 June 2008.
- ^ "Monitor of All-sky X-ray Image (MAXI)". JAXA. 2008. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
- ^ ESA via SPACEREF "SOLAR: three years observing and ready for solar maximum", March 14, 2011
- ^ "The International Space Station: life in space". Science in School. 10 December 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2009.
- ^ a b c Jay Buckey (23 February 2006). Space Physiology. Oxford University Press USA. ISBN 978-0-19-513725-5.
- ^ List Grossman (24 July 2009). "Ion engine could one day power 39-day trips to Mars". New Scientist. Retrieved 8 January 2010.
- ^ Brooke Boen (1 May 2009). "Advanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Microgravity (ADUM)". NASA. Retrieved 1 October 2009.
- ^ Sishir Rao; et al. (2008). "A Pilot Study of Comprehensive Ultrasound Education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine". Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 27 (5): 745–749. PMID 18424650.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help) - ^ Michael Fincke; et al. (2004). "Evaluation of Shoulder Integrity in Space: First Report of Musculoskeletal US on the International Space Station". Radiology. 234 (2): 319–322. doi:10.1148/radiol.2342041680. PMID 15533948.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help) - ^ "Mars500 study overview". ESA. Jun 4 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "ESA Chief Lauds Renewed U.S. Commitment to Space Station, Earth Science". Peter B. de Selding, Space News. 2 March 2010.
- ^ "Charlie Bolden". www.space.com. Jun 4 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Mars500 partners". ESA. Jun4 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Tiangong I". Chinese Space Agency. Jun4 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "China modular space station program officially initiated". Chinese Space Agency. Jun4 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Chinese space Agency statement of international cooperation". Chinese Space Agency. Jun 4 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Gro Mjeldheim Sandal and Dietrich Manzey (December 2009). "Cross-cultural issues in space operations: A survey study among ground personnel of the European Space Agency". Acta Astronautica. 65 (11–12): 1520–1529. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.074.
- ^ "Amateur Radio on the International Space Station". 6 June 2011. Retrieved 10 June 2011.
- ^ Donna Heivilin (21 June 1994). "Space Station: Impact of the Expanded Russian Role on Funding and Research" (PDF). Government Accountability Office. Retrieved 3 November 2006.
- ^ a b c d e NASA (2008). "Consolidated Launch Manifest". NASA. Retrieved 8 July 2008.
- ^ "Mini-Research Module 1 (MIM1) Rassvet (MRM-1)". Russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/spacenews/factsheets/pdfs/servmod.pdf
- ^ "STS-88". Science.ksc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
- ^ "STS-92". Science.ksc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
- ^ a b "HSF: ISS assembly sequence and on-orbit configuration". European Space Agency (ESA). Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ Chris Bergin (26 July 2005). "Discovery launches—The Shuttle is back". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ SOS Web Team. "SOS: ISS Track". Sos.noaa.gov. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
- ^ "Zarya Module". NASA. 14 October 2008. Retrieved 7 December 2009.
- ^ "Unity Connecting Module: Cornerstone for a Home in Orbit" (PDF). NASA. January 1999. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
- ^ "Zvezda Service Module". NASA. 11 March 2009. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
- ^ "NASA—US Destiny Laboratory". NASA. 26 March 2007. Retrieved 26 June 2007.
- ^ "Space Station Extravehicular Activity". NASA. 4 April 2004. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
- ^ "Pirs Docking Compartment". NASA. 10 May 2006. Retrieved 28 March 2009.
- ^ "Harmony Node 2". NASA. 26 September 2007. Retrieved 28 March 2009.
- ^ Chris Bergin (10 January 2008). "PRCB plan STS-122 for NET Feb 7—three launches in 10–11 weeks". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 12 January 2008.
- ^ "Columbus laboratory". European Space Agency (ESA). 10 January 2009. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ a b "NASA—Kibo Japanese Experiment Module". NASA. 23 November 2007. Retrieved 28 March 2009.
- ^ "About Kibo". Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). 25 September 2008. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ Anatoly Zak. "Docking Compartment-1 and 2". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Retrieved 26 March 2009.
- ^ Chris Bergin (10 November 2009). "Russian module launches via Soyuz for Thursday ISS docking". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 10 November 2009.
- ^ Robert Z. Pearlman (15 April 2009). "NASA Names Space Module After Moon Base, Not Stephen Colbert". Space.com. Retrieved 15 April 2009.
- ^ "Node 3: Connecting Module". European Space Agency (ESA). 23 February 2009. Retrieved 28 March 2009.
- ^ "Cupola". European Space Agency (ESA). 16 January 2009. Retrieved 28 March 2009.
- ^ Chris Gebhardt (5 August 2009). "STS-133 refined to a five crew, one EVA mission—will leave MPLM on ISS". NASASpaceflight.com.
- ^ Amos, Jonathan (29 August 2009). "Europe looks to buy Soyuz craft". BBC News.
- ^ "Shuttle Q&A Part 5". NASASpaceflight.com. 27 September 2009. Retrieved 12 October 2009.
- ^ "Consolidated Launch Manifest". NASA. Retrieved 1 March 2011.
- ^ "FGB-based Multipurpose Lab Module (MLM)". Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Centre. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 31 October 2008.
- ^ "Where is the Centrifuge Accommodation Module (CAM)?". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 12 October 2009.
- ^ Tariq Malik (14 February 2006). "NASA Recycles Former ISS Module for Life Support Research". Space.com. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
- ^ "ICM Interim Control Module". U.S. Naval Center for Space Technology. Archived from the original on 8 February 2007.
- ^ a b Anatoly Zak. "Russian segment of the ISS". russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 3 October 2009.
- ^ "Russian Research Modules". Boeing. Retrieved 21 June 2009.
- ^ "International Space Station". Canadian Space Agency. 9 March 2006. Retrieved 4 October 2009.
- ^ "STS-134 press kit cover print file 3-31-11" (PDF). Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ "ERA: European Robotic Arm". ESA. Retrieved 4 October 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Text "date-16 January 2009" ignored (help) - ^ "Remote Manipulator System:About Kibo". JAXA. 29 August 2008. Retrieved 4 October 2009.
- ^ "International Space Station Status Report #02-03". NASA. 14 January 2002. Retrieved 4 October 2009.
- ^ "EXPRESS Racks 1 and 2 fact sheet". NASA. 12 April 2008. Retrieved 4 October 2009.
- ^ L. D. Welsch (30 October 2009). "EVA Checklist: STS-129 Flight Supplement" (PDF). NASA.
- ^ "Space Shuttle Mission: STS-131" (PDF). NASA. February 2011.
- ^ "Space Shuttle Mission: STS-134" (PDF). NASA. April 2011.
- ^ "HTV2: Mission Press Kit" (PDF). Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. 20 January 2011.
- ^ "Exposed Facility:About Kibo". JAXA. 29 August 2008. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
- ^ "NASA—European Technology Exposure Facility (EuTEF)". NASA. 6 October 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2009.
- ^ "ESA—Columbus—European Technology Exposure Facility (EuTEF)". ESA. 13 January 2009. Retrieved 28 February 2009.
- ^ "Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space (ACES)". ESA. Retrieved 9 October 2009.[dead link]
- ^ Michael Finneran (1 March 2011). "Time to Fly: SAGE III — ISS Prepped for Space Station". NASA. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
- ^ "The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer Experiment". CERN. 21 January 2009. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ G. Landis & C-Y. Lu (1991). "Solar Array Orientation Options for a Space Station in Low Earth Orbit". Journal of Propulsion and Power. 7 (1): 123–125. doi:10.2514/3.23302.
- ^ Thomas B. Miller (24 April 2000). "Nickel-Hydrogen Battery Cell Life Test Program Update for the International Space Station". NASA. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
- ^ "NASA, Partners Set Space Station Construction Plan". 2 March 2006.
{{cite web}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); Missing or empty|url=
(help) - ^ "Boeing: Integrated Defense Systems—NASA Systems—International Space Station—Solar Power". Boeing. 2 November 2006. Retrieved 28 January 2009.
- ^ Rand Simberg (29 July 2008). "The Uncertain Future of the International Space Station: Analysis". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ a b "ISS Environment". Johnson Space Center. Archived from the original on 13 February 2008. Retrieved 15 October 2007.
- ^ "Press Release 121208" (PDF). AdAstra Rocket Company. 12 December 2008. Retrieved 7 December 2009.
- ^ "Propulsion Systems of the Future". NASA. Retrieved 29 May 2009.
- ^ David Shiga (5 October 2009). "Rocket company tests world's most powerful ion engine". New Scientist. Retrieved 7 October 2009.
- ^ a b "Exercising Control 49 months of DMS-R Operations" (PDF).[dead link]
- ^ "International Space Station Status Report #05-7". NASA. 11 February 2005. Retrieved 23 November 2008.
- ^ Carlos Roithmayr (2003). Dynamics and Control of Attitude, Power, and Momentum for a Spacecraft Using Flywheels and Control Moment Gyroscopes (PDF). Langley Research Center: NASA. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ Chris Bergin (14 June 2007). "Atlantis ready to support ISS troubleshooting". NASASPaceflight.com. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
- ^ a b "Communications and Tracking". Boeing. Archived from the original on 11 June 2008. Retrieved 30 November 2009.
- ^ Mathews, Melissa (25 March 2005). "International Space Station Status Report: SS05-015". NASA News. NASA. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Harvey, Brian (2007). The rebirth of the Russian space program: 50 years after Sputnik, new frontiers. Springer Praxis Books. p. 263. ISBN 0-387-71354-9.
- ^ Anatoly Zak (4 January 2010). "Space exploration in 2011". RussianSpaceWeb. Retrieved 12 January 2010.
- ^ "ISS On-Orbit Status 05/02/10". NASA. 2 May 2010. Retrieved 7 July 2010.
- ^ a b c "Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Government of Japan Concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station". NASA. 24 February 1998. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- ^ "Operations Local Area Network (OPS LAN) Interface Control Document" (PDF). NASA. February 2000. Retrieved 30 November 2009.
- ^ "ISS/ATV communication system flight on Soyuz". EADS Astrium. 28 February 2005. Retrieved 30 November 2009.
- ^ Chris Bergin (10 November 2009). "STS-129 ready to support Dragon communication demo with ISS". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 30 November 2009.
- ^ "Amateur Radio on the International Space Station". www.arrl.org. Jun 6 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "2001: A Space Laptop | SpaceRef - Your Space Reference". SpaceRef. 18 September 2000. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ "First Tweet from Space". New York Times.
- ^ Tariq Malik (15 February 2006). "Air Apparent: New Oxygen Systems for the ISS". Space.com. Retrieved 21 November 2008.
- ^ a b Patrick L. Barry (13 November 2000). "Breathing Easy on the Space Station". NASA. Retrieved 21 November 2008.
- ^ Craig Freudenrich (20 November 2000). "How Space Stations Work". Howstuffworks. Retrieved 23 November 2008.
- ^ "5–8: The Air Up There". NASAexplores. NASA. Archived from the original on 14 November 2006. Retrieved 31 October 2008.
- ^ Clinton Anderson (30 January 1968). Report of the Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences, United States Senate—Apollo 204 Accident (PDF). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. p. 8.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b "European Users Guide to Low Gravity Platforms" (PDF). European Space Agency. 6 December 2005. Retrieved 16 May 2006.[dead link]
- ^ "Materials Science 101". Science@NASA. 15 September 1999. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
- ^ Price, Pat (2005). The backyard stargazer : an absolute beginner's guide to skywatching with and without a telescope. Gloucester, Mass.: Quarry Books. p. 140. ISBN 1592531482.
- ^ "How to Spot the International Space Station (and other satellites)". Hayden Planetarium. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ NASA (2 July 2008). "International Space Station Sighting Opportunities". NASA. Retrieved 28 January 2009.
- ^ "ISS – Information". Heavens-Above.com. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
- ^ Harold F. Weaver (1947). "The Visibility of Stars Without Optical Aid". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 59 (350).
- ^ Spaceweather.com (5 June 2009). "ISS visible during the daytime". Spaceweather.com. Retrieved 5 June 2009.
- ^ a b Cooney, Jim. "Mission Control Answers Your Questions". Houston, TX.
Jim Cooney ISS Trajectory Operations Officer
- ^ Pelt, Michel van (2009). Into the Solar System on a String : Space Tethers and Space Elevators (1. Ed. ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York. p. 133. ISBN 0387765557.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Mission Elapsed Time explained". NASA. 13 September 1995. Archived from the original on 15 November 2007. Retrieved 9 November 2007.
- ^ "Ask the STS-113 crew: Question 14". NASA. 7 December 2002. Retrieved 9 November 2007.
- ^ "STS-113 Mission and Expedition Crew Question and Answer Board". NASA. November 2002. Retrieved 24 February 2009.
- ^ "ISS Crew Timeline" (PDF). NASA. 5 November 2008. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
- ^ a b c d e "Living and Working on the International Space Station" (PDF). CSA. Retrieved 28 October 2009.
- ^ a b c d e "Daily life". ESA. 19 July 2004. Retrieved 28 October 2009.
- ^ a b c d e f Cheryl L. Mansfield (7 November 2008). "Station Prepares for Expanding Crew". NASA. Retrieved 17 September 2009.
- ^ "Bungee Cords Keep Astronauts Grounded While Running". NASA. 16 June 2009. Retrieved 23 August 2009.
- ^ Amiko Kauderer (19 August 2009). "Do Tread on Me". NASA. Retrieved Augist 23, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ "At Home with Commander Scott Kelly (Video)". International Space Station: NASA. 6 December 2010. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
- ^ "International Space Station USOS Crew Quarters Development" (PDF). SAE International. 2008. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Tariq Malik (27 July 2009). "Sleeping in Space is Easy, But There's No Shower". Space.com. Retrieved 29 October 2009.
- ^ Ed Lu (8 September 2003). "Greetings Earthling". NASA. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
- ^ a b "International Space Station Expeditions". NASA. 10 April 2009. Retrieved 13 April 2009.
- ^ a b NASA (2008). "International Space Station". NASA. Retrieved 22 October 2008.
- ^ Hoversten, Paul (1 May 2011). "Assembly (Nearly) Complete". Air & Space Magazine. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
In fact, we're designed on the U.S. side to take four crew. The ISS design is actually for seven. We operate with six because first, we can get all our work done with six, and second, we don't have a vehicle that allows us to fly a seventh crew member. Our requirement for the new vehicles being designed is for four seats. So I don't expect us to go down in crew size. I would expect us to increase it.
- ^ "Facts and Figures". NASA. 15 December 2010. Retrieved 21 December 2010.
- ^ "Live listing of spacecraft operations". NASA. 1 December 2009. Archived from the original on 3 August 2008. Retrieved 8 December 2009.
- ^ Space Operations Mission Directorate (30 August 2006). "Human Space Flight Transition Plan" (PDF). NASA.
- ^ "NASA Seeks Proposals for Crew and Cargo Transportation to Orbit" (Press release). NASA. 18 January 2006. Retrieved 21 November 2006.
- ^ "ESA — ATV — Crew role in mission control". Esa.int. 2 March 2011. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- ^ "ESA — Human Spaceflight and Exploration — International Space Station — Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV)". Esa.int. 16 January 2009. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- ^ http://www.usu.edu/mae/aerospace/publications/JDSC_RoadToAutonomy.pdf
- ^ "NASA — Expedition 27". Nasa.gov. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- ^ Pete Harding (27 April 2011). "Progress M-10M launches on cargo run to International Space Station". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 2 May 2011.
- ^ "Expedition 28". NASA. Retrieved 9 June 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f Welcome to space-multimedia 2nd January 2011
- ^ http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts135/status.html>
- ^ "NASA proposes Soyuz photo op; shuttle launch readiness reviewed (UPDATED)". CBS. Retrieved 11 February 2011.
- ^ "ESA - ATV - ATV-3: Edoardo Amaldi". Esa.int. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ a b "Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Canadian Space Agency Concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station". NASA. 29 January 1998. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- ^ Liz Austin Peterson (30 October 2007). "Astronauts notice tear in solar panel". Associated Press. Retrieved 30 October 2007.
- ^ Stein, Rob (4 November 2007). "Space Station's Damaged Panel Is Fixed". The Washington Post. Retrieved 4 November 2007.
- ^ William Harwood (25 March 2008). "Station chief gives detailed update on joint problem". CBS News & SpaceflightNow.com. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
- ^ "Crew Expansion Prep, SARJ Repair Focus of STS-126". NASA. 30 October 2008. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
- ^ William Harwood (18 November 2008). "Astronauts prepare for first spacewalk of shuttle flight". CBS News & SpaceflightNow.com. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
- ^ James Olberg (3 February 2009). "Shaking on space station rattles NASA". MSNBC. Retrieved 4 February 2009.
- ^ Chris Bergin (10 February 2009). "Progress M-66 launches, heads for the International Space Station". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 10 February 2009.
- ^ a b Chris Bergin (1 April 2009). "ISS concern over S1 Radiator – may require replacement via shuttle mission". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 3 April 2009.
- ^ "Problem forces partial powerdown aboard station". Spaceflightnow.com. 31 July 2010. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- ^ "NASA ISS On-Orbit Status 1 August 2010 (early edition)". Spaceref.com. 31 July 2010. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- ^ "ISS Active Control System". Boeing.com. 21 November 2006. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- ^ Spaceflight Now "Wednesday spacewalk to remove failed coolant pump"
- ^ NASA spaceflight Aug 11 "Large success for second EVA as failed Pump Module is removed"
- ^ Spaceflight Now Aug 12 "Station's bad pump removed; more spacewalking ahead"
- ^ Spaceflight Now, Aug 18 ISS cooling configuration returning to normal confirming ETCS PM success
- ^ "Cooling System Malfunction Highlights Space Station's Complexity". Space.com. 2 August 2010.
- ^ "Spacewalks needed to fix station cooling problem". Spaceflightnow. 31 July 2010.
- ^ Michael Hoffman (3 April 2009). "National Space Symposium 2009: It's getting crowded up there". Defense News. Retrieved 7 October 2009.
- ^ Kendall, Anthony (2 May 2006). "Earth's Artificial Ring: Project West Ford". DamnInteresting.com. Retrieved 16 October 2006.
- ^ F. L. Whipple (1949). "The Theory of Micrometeoroids". Popular Astronomy. 57: 517. Bibcode:1949PA.....57..517W.
- ^ a b Chris Bergin (28 June 2011). "STS-135: FRR sets July 8 Launch Date for Atlantis – Debris misses ISS". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
- ^ Henry Nahra (24–29 April 1989). "Effect of Micrometeoroid and Space Debris Impacts on the Space Station Freedom Solar Array Surfaces" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 7 October 2009.
- ^ Leonard David (7 January 2002). "Space Junk and ISS: A Threatening Problem". Space.com. Retrieved 30 November 2008.[dead link]
- ^ Rachel Courtland (16 March 2009). "Space station may move to dodge debris". New Scientist. Retrieved 20 April 2010.
- ^ a b "ISS Maneuvers to Avoid Russian Fragmentation Debris" (PDF). Orbital Debris Quarterly News. 12 (4). NASA: 1&2. 2008. Retrieved 20 April 2010.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ "ATV carries out first debris avoidance manoeuvre for the ISS". ESA. 28 August 2008. Retrieved 26 February 2010.
- ^ "Avoiding satellite collisions in 2009" (PDF). Orbital Debris Quarterly News. 14 (1). NASA: 2. 2010. Retrieved 20 April 2010.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ G Horneck, DM Klaus & RL Mancinelli (March 2010). "Space Microbiology, section Space Environment (p. 122)" (PDF). Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
- ^ Jonathan Amos (23 August 2010). "Beer microbes live 553 days outside ISS". BBC News. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
- ^ "Spacesuits optional for 'water bears'". Nature.com. 8 September 2008. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
- ^ Ker Than (23 February 2006). "Solar Flare Hits Earth and Mars". Space.com.
- ^ "A new kind of solar storm". NASA. 10 June 2005.
- ^ a b Eugenie Samuel (23 October 2002). "Space station radiation shields 'disappointing'". New Scientist. Retrieved 7 October 2009.
- ^ "Galactic Radiation Received in Flight". FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- ^ James Oberg (11 January 2004). "Crew finds 'culprit' in space station leak". MSNBC. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
- ^ William Harwood (18 September 2006). "Oxygen Generator Problem Triggers Station Alarm". CBS News through Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 24 November 2008.
- ^ "NASA Signs International Space Station Agreement With Brazil". NASA. 14 October 1997. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
- ^ Emerson Kimura (2009). "Made in Brazil O Brasil na Estação Espacial Internacional" (in Portuguese). Gizmodo Brazil. Retrieved 9 March 2011.
- ^ "International Space Station (ISS)". Italian Space Agency. 18 January 2009. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
- ^ "It's decision time on international space program". Chinadaily.com.cn. 2 June 2010. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
- ^ "Can China enter the international space family?". Universetoday.com. 10 January 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
- ^ "South Korea, India to begin ISS partnership talks in 2010". Flight International. 19 June 2010. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
- ^ "EU mulls opening ISS to more countries". Space-travel.com. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- ^ "Russian Federal Space Agency - Roscosmos | News". Federalspace.ru. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ Pearlman, Robert Z. (30 May 2011). "Real space station done, now on to LEGO version - Technology & science - Space - Space.com - msnbc.com". MSNBC. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ Astronauts Complete Space Station in 4th, Final Spacewalk - Yahoo! News[dead link]
- ^ "Astronauts make history on final spacewalk, finish construction of International Space Station". www.newser.com. June 2011.[dead link]
- ^ "Launch Schedule". Nasa.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ NASA (2007). "Renal Stone Risk During Spaceflight: Assessment and Countermeasure Validation (Renal Stone)". NASA. Retrieved 13 November 2007.[dead link]
- ^ NASA (2007). "Sleep-Wake Actigraphy and Light Exposure During Spaceflight-Long (Sleep-Long)". NASA. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
- ^ NASA (2007). "Anomalous Long Term Effects in Astronauts' Central Nervous System (ALTEA)". NASA. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
- ^ James J. Secosky, George Musser (1996). "Up, Up, and Away". Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 10 September 2006.
- ^ Joel Achenbach (13 July 2009). "As Space Station Nears Completion, It Faces End of Mission". The Washington Post. Retrieved 18 July 2009.
- ^ "Statement by Charlie Bolden, NASA Budget Press Conference" (PDF) (Press release). NASA. 1 February 2010. Retrieved 1 February 2010.
- ^ a b Stephen Clark (11 March 2010). "Space station partners set 2028 as certification goal". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 14 March 2010.
- ^ "International Space Station Could Fly Through 2028, NASA Partners Say". Space.com. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- ^ "International Partners Discuss Space Station Extension and Use". SpaceRef.com. 22 September 2010. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- ^ a b Zak, Anatoly (22 May 2009). "Russia 'to save its ISS modules'". BBC News. Retrieved 23 May 2009.
- ^ a b "Tier 2 EIS for ISS" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ Thomas Kelly; et al. (2000). Engineering Challenges to the Long-Term Operation of the International Space Station. National Academies Press. pp. 28–30. ISBN 0-309-06938-6. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
{{cite book}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help) - ^ "Entry Debris Field estimation methods and application to Compton Gamma Ray Observatory" (PDF). Mission Operations Directorate Nasa Johnson Space Center. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
- ^ Rob Coppinger (7 March 2007). "NASA may buy ESA's ATV to de-orbit ISS at end of life". Flightglobal. Retrieved 27 September 2009.
- ^ "DC-1 and MIM-2". Russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
External links
- Official International Space Station webpages of the participating space agencies
- NASA
- RSC Energia
- Russian Federal Space Agency
- Canadian Space Agency
- European Space Agency
- Japanese Space Agency
- Italian Space Agency
- Daily ISS reports
- Interactive and multimedia
- ISS in telescope
- NASA's ISS interactive reference guide
- NASA's ISS image gallery search page
- Current position of the ISS
- ISS and satellite tracking website
- ISS Webcam
- Animation showing ISS assembly sequence
- ISS real-time tracking information
- Free App for iPhone/iPod touch to predict ISS sightings
- Free App for iPhone/iPad to follow ISS operations and status
- Experiments and science
- ESA – Columbus
- JAXA – Space Environment Utilization and Space Experiment
- NASA – Station Science
- RSC Energia – Science Research on ISS Russian Segment
- Media articles
Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA