Peter Damian (old) (talk | contribs) |
Peter Damian (old) (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:There occurred a remarkable celestial portent; for [[Castor]] records that, in the brilliant star Venus, called Vesperugo by [[Plautus]], and the lovely Hesperus by [[Homer]], there occurred so strange a prodigy, that it changed its colour, size, form, course, which never appeared before nor since. [[Adrastus of Cyzicus]], and [[Dion of Naples]], famous mathematicians, said that this occurred in the reign of [[Ogyges]]. |
:There occurred a remarkable celestial portent; for [[Castor]] records that, in the brilliant star Venus, called Vesperugo by [[Plautus]], and the lovely Hesperus by [[Homer]], there occurred so strange a prodigy, that it changed its colour, size, form, course, which never appeared before nor since. [[Adrastus of Cyzicus]], and [[Dion of Naples]], famous mathematicians, said that this occurred in the reign of [[Ogyges]]. |
||
: So great an author as Varro would certainly not have called this a portent had it not seemed to be contrary to nature. For we say that all portents are contrary to nature; but they are not so. For how is that contrary to nature which happens by the will of God, since the will of so mighty a Creator is certainly the nature of each created thing? A portent, therefore, happens not contrary to nature, but contrary to what we know as nature. (Modern Library, p. 776, tr. Dods, emphasis added.) |
|||
Augustine argues that there can be no true transgression of the laws of nature, because everything that happens according to God's will happens by nature, and a transgression of the laws of nature would therefore happen contrary to God's will. A miracle therefore is not contrary to nature as it really is, but only contrary to nature as our current understanding supposes it to be. |
Revision as of 11:35, 30 August 2008
The Epistemic Theory of Miracles is the name given by the philosopher William Vallicella, to the theory of miraculous events given by St. Augustine and Spinoza. According to the theory, there are no events contrary to nature: there are no "transgressions" in Hume's sense, of the laws of nature. An event is a miracle only in the sense that it does not agree with our understanding of nature, or fit our picture of nature, or thwarts our expectations as to how the world should behave, etc. According to a perfect scientific understanding there would be no miracles at all.
Augustine's account
In The City of God, Book XXI, Chapter 8, Augustine quotes Marcus Varro, Of the Race of the Roman People:
- There occurred a remarkable celestial portent; for Castor records that, in the brilliant star Venus, called Vesperugo by Plautus, and the lovely Hesperus by Homer, there occurred so strange a prodigy, that it changed its colour, size, form, course, which never appeared before nor since. Adrastus of Cyzicus, and Dion of Naples, famous mathematicians, said that this occurred in the reign of Ogyges.
- So great an author as Varro would certainly not have called this a portent had it not seemed to be contrary to nature. For we say that all portents are contrary to nature; but they are not so. For how is that contrary to nature which happens by the will of God, since the will of so mighty a Creator is certainly the nature of each created thing? A portent, therefore, happens not contrary to nature, but contrary to what we know as nature. (Modern Library, p. 776, tr. Dods, emphasis added.)
Augustine argues that there can be no true transgression of the laws of nature, because everything that happens according to God's will happens by nature, and a transgression of the laws of nature would therefore happen contrary to God's will. A miracle therefore is not contrary to nature as it really is, but only contrary to nature as our current understanding supposes it to be.