Red-tailed hawk (talk | contribs) →3...Nxg4: add Tag: Visual edit |
Red-tailed hawk (talk | contribs) Tag: Visual edit |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Black has multiple responses available on move three that provide black with comfortable play.<ref name=":3" /> However, the aggressive opening may offer [[practical chances]] for White, particularly in [[fast chess]];<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|page=194}} following Mamedyarov's 2022 game against Espineko the Devin Gambit has become more frequently played in [[blitz chess]].<ref name=":3" /> |
Black has multiple responses available on move three that provide black with comfortable play.<ref name=":3" /> However, the aggressive opening may offer [[practical chances]] for White, particularly in [[fast chess]];<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|page=194}} following Mamedyarov's 2022 game against Espineko the Devin Gambit has become more frequently played in [[blitz chess]].<ref name=":3" /> |
||
=== 3...Bb4+ === |
=== 3. ...Bb4+ === |
||
{{Chess position |
{{Chess position |
||
| pgn = 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g4 Bb4|footer=Position after 3... Bb4+ |
| pgn = 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g4 Bb4|footer=Position after 3... Bb4+ |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Considering 4. Bd2, Bok recommends that Black capture the [[Bishop (chess)|bishop]] on d2 by playing 4...Bxb2+. After 5. Qxd2 Nxg4 6. Nf3 f5, Bok argues that black has achieved equality by the end of move 6. Should White recapture on d2 with the queen's knight on the fifth move instead of with the queen, Bok argues that 5 ...Nxg4 6. e4 f5 allows Black to maintain a material advantage over White without providing any compensation, writing that after 7. exf5 exf5 8. Qe2+ Qe7, White is simply a clean pawn down.<ref name=":3" /> |
Considering 4. Bd2, Bok recommends that Black capture the [[Bishop (chess)|bishop]] on d2 by playing 4...Bxb2+. After 5. Qxd2 Nxg4 6. Nf3 f5, Bok argues that black has achieved equality by the end of move 6. Should White recapture on d2 with the queen's knight on the fifth move instead of with the queen, Bok argues that 5 ...Nxg4 6. e4 f5 allows Black to maintain a material advantage over White without providing any compensation, writing that after 7. exf5 exf5 8. Qe2+ Qe7, White is simply a clean pawn down.<ref name=":3" /> |
||
=== 3...Nxg4 === |
=== 3. ...Nxg4 === |
||
{{Chess position |
{{Chess position |
||
| pgn = 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g4 Nxg4|footer=Position after 3... Nxg4 |
| pgn = 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g4 Nxg4|footer=Position after 3... Nxg4 |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
After 3. ...Nxg4, White aims to play for central control by following up with 4. e4.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=194–195|page=}}<ref name=":6" />{{Rp|pages=201–202}} In ''Unorthodox Chess Openings'', Schiller analyzes a line following White's central pawn push beginning with 4. ...Qh4 5. Nh3 Bb4+ 6. Bd2, recommending that Black play 6. ...Bxd2+. After 7. Qxd2 Nf6, Schiller states that Black has a significant advantage.<ref name=":6" />{{Rp|pages=201–202}} In ''Taming Wild Chess Openings'', Watson and Schiller also advocate that Black reply with 4... Qh4, but provide the White reply of 5. Qe2. After 5. ...Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Nc6 7. Nf3 Bxd2+ 8. Nbxd2 Qh6 White obtains good piece activity, though it was not clear if the activity provided sufficient compensation for the g-pawn.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=194–195|page=}} |
After 3. ...Nxg4, White aims to play for central control by following up with 4. e4.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=194–195|page=}}<ref name=":6" />{{Rp|pages=201–202}} In ''Unorthodox Chess Openings'', Schiller analyzes a line following White's central pawn push beginning with 4. ...Qh4 5. Nh3 Bb4+ 6. Bd2, recommending that Black play 6. ...Bxd2+. After 7. Qxd2 Nf6, Schiller states that Black has a significant advantage.<ref name=":6" />{{Rp|pages=201–202}} In ''Taming Wild Chess Openings'', Watson and Schiller also advocate that Black reply with 4... Qh4, but provide the White reply of 5. Qe2. After 5. ...Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Nc6 7. Nf3 Bxd2+ 8. Nbxd2 Qh6 White obtains good piece activity, though it was not clear if the activity provided sufficient compensation for the g-pawn.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=194–195|page=}} |
||
Watson and Schiller analyze 4. Nf3 as a fourth-move alternative to the above for White, though conclude that after 4. ...d5 Black will obtain a solid position and White will lack compensation for the gambited pawn.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=|page=194}} |
Watson and Schiller analyze 4. Nf3 as a fourth-move alternative to the above for White, though conclude that after 4. ...d5 Black will obtain a solid position and White will lack compensation for the gambited pawn.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=|page=194}} |
||
===3. ...d5=== |
|||
<ref>{{Cite book |last=Keetman |first=Maaike |url=https://www.chessable.com/the-fierce-vienna-catalan-and-sidelines/course/143331/ |title=The Fierce Vienna, Catalan and Sidelines |date=Feb 13, 2023 |publisher=[[Chessable]] |year= |chapter=16) 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 - 3rd Move Alternatives}}</ref> |
|||
== Selected games == |
== Selected games == |
||
Devin vs Zachs (Lansing, 1966):<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=16}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Johnson |first=Joel |url=https://www. |
Devin vs Zachs (Lansing, 1966):<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=16}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Johnson |first=Joel |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Positional_Attacks/7H14BgAAQBAJ |title=Positional Attacks |publisher=Lulu Press, Inc |year=2014 |isbn=9781312029965 |editor-last=Hammond |editor-first=Patrick |language=en}}</ref>{{Rp|pages=296–297}} |
||
Revision as of 17:07, 16 March 2024
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moves | 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO | A50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Queen's Pawn Game |
The Devin gambit is an offbeat chess opening that begins with the moves:[1]: 194–195 [2]: 455 [3]: 201–202
In this gambit, White offers a sacrifice of the g-pawn on g4, where it can be captured by Black's knight. White plans to play for central control by placing a pawn on e4.[1]: 194 [3]: 201–202
History
The opening was played in 1966 in a game at the Lansing Chess Club. Bill Devin, playing with the white pieces, opened with the gambit in a game that resulted in a twenty-one move checkmate.[5]: 16 By August 1971, the gambit had become known in Michigan as the Devin Gambit, and a reader of Chess Life & Review wrote to grandmaster and chess columnist Larry Evans asking if the gambit offered a free pawn or if white gained sufficient compensation for the g-pawn offered in the gambit. Evans evaluated the gambit as being unfavorable for White; per Evans, Black accepting the gambit by taking the pawn with the f6 knight would not to open up the position to White's benefit and would not lead to sufficient attacking chances for White.[2]: 455
The line was played by Shakhriyar Mamedyarov in a game against Andrey Esipenko during the 2022 Tata Steel Masters tournament in Wijk aan Zee.[6][7] The use of the line was shocking to observers;[6] the move has rarely been seen at high-level play.[4][6]
Variations and analysis
Black has multiple responses available on move three that provide black with comfortable play.[6] However, the aggressive opening may offer practical chances for White, particularly in fast chess;[1]: 194 following Mamedyarov's 2022 game against Espineko the Devin Gambit has become more frequently played in blitz chess.[6]
3. ...Bb4+
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
Benjamin Bok, a grandmaster from the Netherlands, argues that 3 ...Bb4+ is the easiest continuation for black to play. After this reply, White may choose to continue play with 4. Nd2, 4. Nc3, or 4. Bd2.[6]
Against the formermost option, Bok recommends that black capture the pawn on g4 on move four. Should White continue with their ordinary plan of pushing the e-pawn and play 5. e4, Bok recommends that Black respond with 5...f5, arguing that White lacks compensation for the sacrificed g-pawn. Against other knight move, which places the piece on c3, Bok recommends that Black respond by pushing the d-pawn with 4 ...d5, arguing that the resulting position will yield Black a slight advantage.[6]
Considering 4. Bd2, Bok recommends that Black capture the bishop on d2 by playing 4...Bxb2+. After 5. Qxd2 Nxg4 6. Nf3 f5, Bok argues that black has achieved equality by the end of move 6. Should White recapture on d2 with the queen's knight on the fifth move instead of with the queen, Bok argues that 5 ...Nxg4 6. e4 f5 allows Black to maintain a material advantage over White without providing any compensation, writing that after 7. exf5 exf5 8. Qe2+ Qe7, White is simply a clean pawn down.[6]
3. ...Nxg4
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
Evans briefly argued in 1971 that the Devin Gambit is not favorable for White after 3...Nxg4, stating that accepting the gambit granted White insufficient compensation for the sacrificed pawn.[2]: 455 Eric Schiller, writing in his 1998 book Unorthodox Chess Openings, analyzes 3...Nxg4 as better for Black with accurate play.[3]: 201–202 John L. Watson and Schiller, writing jointly in their 2015 book Taming Wild Chess Openings, likewise advocate for immediately accepting White's gambit on move 3.[1]: 194
After 3. ...Nxg4, White aims to play for central control by following up with 4. e4.[1]: 194–195 [3]: 201–202 In Unorthodox Chess Openings, Schiller analyzes a line following White's central pawn push beginning with 4. ...Qh4 5. Nh3 Bb4+ 6. Bd2, recommending that Black play 6. ...Bxd2+. After 7. Qxd2 Nf6, Schiller states that Black has a significant advantage.[3]: 201–202 In Taming Wild Chess Openings, Watson and Schiller also advocate that Black reply with 4... Qh4, but provide the White reply of 5. Qe2. After 5. ...Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Nc6 7. Nf3 Bxd2+ 8. Nbxd2 Qh6 White obtains good piece activity, though it was not clear if the activity provided sufficient compensation for the g-pawn.[1]: 194–195
Watson and Schiller analyze 4. Nf3 as a fourth-move alternative to the above for White, though conclude that after 4. ...d5 Black will obtain a solid position and White will lack compensation for the gambited pawn.[1]: 194
3. ...d5
Selected games
Devin vs Zachs (Lansing, 1966):[5]: 16 [9]: 296–297
Mamedyarov v Espineko (Wijk an Zee, 2022):[7]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g Watson, John; Schiller, Eric (2015). Taming Wild Chess Openings: How to Deal with the Good, the Bad and the Ugly Over the Chess Board. New in Chess. ISBN 9789056915711.
- ^ a b c Evans, Larry (August 1971). "Larry Evans on Chess" (PDF). Chess Life & Review. 26 (8).
- ^ a b c d e Schiller, Eric (1998). Unorthodox Chess Openings (1st ed.). Cardoza Books. ISBN 9780940685734.
- ^ a b "Tata Steel Masters: Magnus Carlsen join leaders". International Chess Federation. June 16, 2022.
- ^ a b Root, Alexey (2021). "Bill Devin: Sacrifice Requested" (PDF). Texas Knights. 62 (3). Texas Chess Association.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Bok, Benjamin (April 17, 2023). "13) 1.d4 Sidelines". Lifetime Repertoires: Nimzo-Queen's Indian − Part 1. Chessable.
- ^ a b "Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs Andrey Esipenko: 84th Tata Steel Masters (2022), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 2, Jan-16". Chessgames.com. 2022.
- ^ Keetman, Maaike (February 13, 2023). "16) 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 - 3rd Move Alternatives". The Fierce Vienna, Catalan and Sidelines. Chessable.
- ^ Johnson, Joel (2014). Hammond, Patrick (ed.). Positional Attacks. Lulu Press, Inc. ISBN 9781312029965.