It has been claimed that Internet operations by Russian secret police services include a variety of "active measures" to influence the world events, including denial of service attacks, hacker attacks, dissemination of disinformation over the internet, participation of state-sponsored teams in political blogs, internet surveillance using SORM technology, and persecution of cyber-dissidents. According to investigative journalist Andrei Soldatov [1], some of these activities are coordinated by the Russian signals intelligence, which is currently a part of the FSB but has been formerly a part of 16th KGB department, but others are directed by the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs.
According to a publication in Russian computer weekly Computerra, the involvement of Russian security services in such activities, especially in Russian wikipedia, almost certainly takes place, although "this is not even interesting — everyone knows perfectly well that security bodies have a special place in structure of our [Russian] state" [2]
Disinformation
US author Pete Earley described his interviews with former senior Russian intelligence officer Sergei Tretyakov who defected in the United States in 2000. According to him,
Sergei would send an officer to a branch of New York Public Library where he could get access to the Internet without anyone knowing his identity. The officer would post the propaganda on various websites and send it in emails to US publications and broadcasters. Some propaganda would be disguised as educational or scientific reports. ... The studies had been generated at the Center) by Russian experts. The reports would be 99% accurate but would always contain a kernel of disinformation that favored Russian foreign policy. ... "Our goal was to cause dissension and unrest inside the US and anti-American feelings abroad" [3]
.
Tretyakov did not specify the targeted web sites, but made clear they selected the sites which are most convenient for distributing the specific disinformation. During his work in New York in the end of 1990s, one of the most frequent disinformation subjects was War in Chechnya.
According to Soldatov, the group of people, who claimed they are GRU employees, published information on military progress of the US invasion of Iraq on a web-site publishing news about the campaign.[1]
Cyberattacs
It has been claimed that Russian security services organized a number of denial of service attacks as a part of their Cyber-warfare against other countries[4], most notably 2007 cyberattacks on Estonia and 2008 cyberattacks on Russia, South Ossetia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan [4]. One of young Russian hackers said that he was paid by the Russian state security services to lead the hacker attacks on NATO computers. He was majoring computer sciences at the Department of the Defense of Information. His tuition was paid by the FSB[5]
At the same time, speaking of 2007 cyberattacks, Estonia's defence minister Jaak Aaviksoo admitted he does not possess evidence of Russian involvement in cyberattacks.[6]
As to the 2008 cyberattacks on Georgia, an independent US-based research institute US Cyber Consequences Unit report stated the attacks had "little or no direct involvement from the Russian government or military". According to the institute's conclusions, some severalattacks were carried from PCs of multiple users, located in Russia, Ukraine and Latvia. These people were willingly participating in cyberwarfare, being Russia supporters during 2008 South Ossetia war. Some attacks also used botnets. [7][8]
According to Soldatov, a hacker attack on his web site Agentura was apparently directed by the secret services in the middle of Moscow theater hostage crisis[1].
Discussion on control over the Internet
In 2006 radio talk show hosted by Yevgenia Albats with a topic "Control over the Internet: How does that happen?", Russian journalist Andrei Soldatov made the following points[9]:
- There are countries with greater or less control over the Internet; but there is control over the Internet in Russia;
- During the US invasion of Iraq, a group of people calling themselves GRU officers published allegedly internal GRU information on American losses in Iraq — this information was shown on the background of Anti-american hysteria and was well consumed. Later it turned out this information was not credible, but this effectively didn't change the result;
- After 2005 Nalchik raid Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement that Kavkaz Center "is a very bad resource", and after two days two teams calling themselves hackers appeared, to arrange hacker attacks against Kavkaz Center;
- Soldatov doesn't think web brigades are fiction. He had related issues with his own site, especially during such events like Moscow theater hostage crisis;
- One of structures having related business with the Internet is signals intelligence, which is currently a part of the FSB and has been formerly a part of 16th KGB department;
- There is a related agency in Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs with competent people who can do such things. [9]
Persecution of cyber-dissidents by the FSB
- When Russian president Vladimir Putin called on his nation's women to have more children, journalist Vladimir Rakhmankov published a satiric article on the Internet calling Putin "the nation's phallic symbol". Rakhmankov was found guilty of offending Vladimir Putin and fined by the court to the sum of 20,000 roubles (about 680 USD).[10][11][12][13][14] Rakhmanov didn't plead guilty; actions of prosecutors lead a number of Russian and international newspapers to republish Rakhmanov's article. FSB wasn't involved in Rakhmanov's case. [10]
- Journalist Boris Stomakhin was convicted in 2006 to five years of prison on charges of inciting national and religious hatred in his monthly bulletin "Radical Politics". [15] FSB wasn't involved in Stomakhin's case. [15]
- Director of Russian-Chechen Friendship Society Stanislav Dmitrievsky received in 2006 a suspended two-year sentence for publishing articles of Aslan Maskhadov and Akhmed Zakayev in his newspaper "Pravo-zaschita". [16] [17] [18] FSB wasn't involved in Dmitrievsky's case. [18]
Disruption of political blogs
The appearance of Russian state security teams in RuNet was described in 2003 by journalist Anna Polyanskaya [19] (a former assistant to assassinated Russian politician Galina Starovoitova[20]), historian Andrey Krivov and political activist Ivan Lomako. They claimed the appearance of organized and fairly professional "brigades", composed of ideologically and methodologically identical personalities, who were working in practically every popular liberal and pro-democracy Internet forums and Internet newspapers of RuNet.[21].
Behavior
According to Polyanskaya and her colleagues, the behavior of people from the Internet brigades has distinct features, some of which are the following:[21] [22]
- Propaganda of the Communist ideology, and constant attempts to present in a positive light the entire history of Russia and the Soviet Union, minimizing the number of people who died in repressions.
- Boundless loyalty to Vladimir Putin and his circle.
- Respect and admiration for the KGB and FSB. The key word which "will force them to reveal their true colors is lustration"; the brigade will cry out in a choir about "bloody repressions by democratic murderers" and "witch hunts" after mentioning this word.
- Hatred of dissidents and human rights organizations and activists, political prisoners and journalists, especially Anna Politkovskaya, Sergei Kovalev, Elena Bonner, Grigory Pasko, Victor Shenderovich, and Valeria Novodvorskaya.
- Anti-Americanism and anti-Westernism.
- Accusation of Russophobia against everyone who disagrees with them.
- Tendency to accuse their opponents of being insane during arguments.
- Round-the-clock presence on forums. At least one of the uniform members of the team can be found online at all times, always ready to repulse any “attack” by a liberal.
Tactics
- Individual work on opponents. "As soon as an opposition-minded liberal arrives on a forum, expressing a position that makes them a clear "ideological enemy”, he is immediately cornered and subjected to “active measures” by the unified web-brigade. Without provocation, the opponent is piled on with abuse or vicious “arguments” of the sort that the average person cannot adequately react to. As a result, the liberal either answers sharply, causing a scandal and getting himself labeled a “boor” by the rest of the brigade, or else he starts to make arguments against the obvious absurdities, to which his opponents pay no attention, but simply ridicule him and put forth other similar arguments."[21]
- Accusations that opponents are working for “enemies”. The opponents are accused of taking money from Berezovskiy, the CIA, the MOSSAD, Saudi Arabia, the Zionists, or the Chechen rebels.
- Making personally offensive comments, especially of sexual nature.
- Remarkable ability to reveal personal information about their opponents and their quotes from old postings, sometimes more than a year old.
- Teamwork. "They unwaveringly support each other in discussions, ask each other leading questions, put fine points on each other’s answers, and even pretend not to know each other. If an opponent starts to be hounded, this hounding invariably becomes a team effort, involving all of the three to twenty nicknames that invariably are present on any political forum 24 hours a day."[21]
- Appealing to the Administration. The members of teams often "write mass collective complaints about their opponents to the editors, site administrators, or the electronic “complaints book”, demanding that one or another posting or whole discussion thread they don’t like be removed, or calling for the banning of individuals they find problematic."[21]
- Destruction of inconvenient forums. For example, on the site of the Moscow News, all critics of Putin and the FSB "were suddenly and without any explanation banned from all discussions, despite their having broken none of the site’s rules of conduct. All the postings of this group of readers, going back a year and a half, were erased by the site administrator."[21]
"LiveJournal fighters"
A member of National Bolshevik Party Roman Sadykhov reported about "LiveJournal fighters", directed and paid from the Kremlin and instructions given to them by Vladislav Surkov, a close aide of Vladimir Putin [23] Surkov allegedly called Livejournal "a very important sector of work" [24] and said that people's brains must be "nationalized" . He instructed "LiveJournal fighters" that
- "We are losing in the Internet in that respect. It is always easier to break down things than to do something positive. What you are doing are jokes and minor infractions. Not only methods, but also goals must be radical. We must blow this romantics out of them [our opponents]. It is important not only to protect the authorities - this is understood, but we need to attract young people who can work creatively in the Internet. This is an important communication place of young people. Make them interested in conversations with you."[24]
Comments by Russian government official
Alexander Yusupovskiy, head of the analytical department of the Federation Council of Russia (Russian Parliament) published in 2003 an article "Conspiracy theory" in Russian Journal with criticism of theory of web brigades. [25]
Russian agents in Polish web sites
According to claims of unnamed "Polish experts on Russian affairs", reported by the Polish newspaper Tygodnik Powszechny in 2005, at least a dozen active Russian agents work in Poland, also investigating the Polish Internet. The source also claims that the agents scrutinize Polish websites (like those supporting Belarusian opposition), and also perform such actions, as—for instance—contributing to Internet forums on large portals (like Gazeta.pl, Onet.pl, WP.pl). Labeled as Polish Internet users, they incite anti-Semitic or anti-Ukrainian discussions or disavow articles published on the web, according to the source.[26]
In popular culture
The alleged FSB activities on the Internet have been described in the short story "Anastasya" by Russian writer Grigory Svirsky, who was interested in the moral aspects of their work.[27] He wrote: "It seems that offending, betraying, or even "murdering" people in the virtual space is easy. This is like killing an enemy in a video game: one does not see a disfigured body or the eyes of the person who is dying right in front of you. However, the human soul lives by its own basic laws that force it to pay the price for the virtual crime in his real life".[28]
See also
- Information warfare
- Harassment by computer
- Jingjing and Chacha
- Computer crime
- Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China
- Astroturfing
- Web brigades
- 50_Cent_Party
References
- ^ a b c State control over the internet, a talk show by Yevgenia Albats at the Echo of Moscow, January 22, 2006; interview with Andrei Soldatov and others
- ^ Is there only one truth? by Kivy Bird, Computerra, 26 November 2008
- ^ Pete Earley, "Comrade J: The Untold Secrets of Russia's Master Spy in America After the End of the Cold War", Penguin Books, 2007, ISBN 978-0-399-15439-3, pages 194-195
- ^ Cyberspace and the changing nature of warfare. Strategists must be aware that part of every political and military conflict will take place on the internet, says Kenneth Geers.
- ^ Andrew Meier, Black Earth. W.W. Norton & Company, 2003, ISBN 0-393-05178-1, pages 15-16.
- ^ [1]
- ^ [2]
- ^ [3]
- ^ a b Control over the Internet: how does that happen?, a talk show by Yevgenia Albats at the Echo of Moscow, January 22, 2006; interview with Andrei Soldatov and others
- ^ a b Court estimated 'phallic symbol' to the sum of 20,000 roubles, by Kommersant
- ^ "GLASNOST DEFENSE FOUNDATION'S DIGEST No. 298". 2006-09-26. Retrieved 2007-05-11.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Russia: 'Phallic' Case Threatens Internet Freedom
- ^ U.S. Media Watchdog Criticizes Russia
- ^ Media freedom watchdog condemns conviction of journalist in Russia
- ^ a b Boris Stomakhin -- victim of the regime or extremist, Svoboda News
- ^ Russia: Activist’s Conviction Hurts Freedom of Expression statement by Human Rights Watch
- ^ KAVKAZ-CENTER WRITER APPEALS JAIL SENTENCE - by Jamestown Foundation
- ^ a b Dmitrievsky considers court decision political, Kavkaz Uzel
- ^ Articles by Anna Polyanskaya, MAOF publishing group
- ^ Template:Ru icon "They are killing Galina Starovoitova for the second time", by Anna Polyanskaya
- ^ a b c d e f Commissars of the Internet. The FSB at the Computer by Anna Polyanskaya, Andrei Krivov, and Ivan Lomko, Vestnik online, April 30, 2003 (English translation)
- ^ The Kremlin's virtual squad, Anna Polyanskaya Andrei Krivov, Ivan Lomko, 19 - 03 - 2009, openDemocracy.net
- ^ Template:Ru icon Interview with Roman Sadykhov, grani.ru, 3 April, 2007
- ^ a b Military wing of Kremlin (Russian), The New Times, 19 March, 2007
- ^ Conspiracy theory, by Alexander Yusupovskiy, Russian Journal, 25 April, 2003
- ^ Operation "Disinformation" - The Russian Foreign Office vs "Tygodnik Powszechny", Tygodnik Powszechny, 13/2005
- ^ " Grigory Svirsky Anastasya. A story on-line (Full text in Russian)
- ^ Template:Ru icon Eye for an eye