Cumbrowski (talk | contribs) reworked based on comments by reviewer (GA evaluation) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Publisher Code of Conduct''' or '''Code of Conduct''' |
The '''Publisher Code of Conduct''' or '''Code of Conduct''' is a guideline for ethical online advertising. It was released by the [[affiliate networks]] [[Commission Junction]], now part of ValueClick (NYSE:VCLK), but an independent company at that time, BeFree, a [[ValueClick]] company, and [[Performics]], a [[DoubleClick]] company, on December 10, 2002. It was created to guide practices and adherence to ethical standards for online advertising in the [[affiliate marketing]] industry. |
||
⚫ | The original code of conduct is titled "Publisher Code of Conduct", because it only included rules that affected publishers or [[affiliates]]. Commission Junction extended the code in its fourth amendment to included rules for advertisers (merchants) as well and dropped the word "publisher" from the title.<ref name=coccj0507>May 9, 2007, [http://www.cj.com/code_of_conduct.html Code of Conduct (Update May 9, 2007)], ''CJ.com'', retrieved September 25, 2007</ref> The original core of the code was brief and generic, consisting of only four small paragraphs.<ref name=orgcoccj>December 10, 2002, [http://www.cj.com/news/press_releases0102/press_021210.html Online Marketing Service Providers Announce Web Publisher Code of Conduct] (contains original CoC text), ''CJ.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref> |
||
==Original core of the code== |
|||
⚫ | The original core of the code was brief and generic, consisting of only four small paragraphs.<ref name=orgcoccj>December 10, 2002, [http://www.cj.com/news/press_releases0102/press_021210.html Online Marketing Service Providers Announce Web Publisher Code of Conduct] (contains original CoC text), ''CJ.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref> |
||
==Historic Background== |
|||
{{cquote|The following actions, practices and conduct, whether active or passive, direct or indirect, are prohibited: |
|||
⚫ | In [[New York City]], New York on November 7, 2002, [[affiliate marketing]] industry leaders convened at the [[Yale Club of New York City|Yale Club]]. They held a debate and fact finding mission to better understand the nature of [[adware]] and to assist leading affiliate networks like [[Commission Junction]], BeFree and [[Performics]] in preparing a [[policy]] that would be fair to all parties<ref name=xblock>Wayne Porter (2005), [http://www.xblock.com/articles/article_show.php?id=26 Code of Conduct and Adware Guidelines], ''XBlock.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref><ref name=cocmin1102>November 7, 2002, [http://www.afftrack.com/summit/ Meeting Minutes - Performance Marketing Summit], retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. |
||
*Interference with referrals. No Web publisher ("Publisher") or software download technology provider ("Technology Provider") may interfere with or seek to influence improperly the referral of a potential customer or visitor ("End-User") to the Web site of an online advertiser ("Advertiser"). No Publisher or Technology Provider will automatically replace or alter any component of a Service Provider's technology that results in a reduction of any compensation earned by another Publisher. For example, a Publisher or Technology Provider may not use methods or technology to automatically replace a Service Provider's tracking identifier of another Publisher with its own Service Provider's tracking identifier or otherwise intercept or redirect an End-User from being referred by another Publisher. |
|||
*Publisher may notify an End-User once that End-User has arrived at the Advertiser's Web site of an opportunity to utilize technology employed by that Publisher and obtain the End-User's consent via affirmative action upon each occurrence to proceed with the operation of such technology. Implementation of software application functionality requires that the notification be easily understood by the average End-User, that it occurs on each instance that the functionality is to be activated, and that it is not objectionable to the Advertiser. |
|||
*Altering another Publisher's site. Publishers may not alter, change, substitute or modify the content of or appearance to an End-User of another Publisher's Web pages, use that Publisher's content to obtain an End-User referral, or obstruct access to another Publisher's Web pages (regardless of receiving permission from the End-User). |
|||
*Software installation and de-installation. Publishers may not bundle downloadable shopping software applications with other applications, whereby the installation and de-installation is not obvious, easy or complete. Licensing and terms of all software downloads and applications of any type must be clearly presented to and accepted by the End-User, and de-installation must be obvious, easy and complete.}}{{sic}} |
|||
==History== |
|||
⚫ | In [[New York City]], New York on November 7, 2002, affiliate marketing industry leaders convened at the [[Yale Club of New York City|Yale Club]]. They held a debate and fact finding mission to better understand the nature of [[adware]] and to assist leading affiliate networks like [[Commission Junction]] |
||
The goal of the meeting was to set up a unified standard between the major networks at the time as to what were acceptable methods for affiliates/publishers using adware to operate within the affiliate marketing channel. |
The goal of the meeting was to set up a unified standard between the major networks at the time as to what were acceptable methods for affiliates/publishers using adware to operate within the affiliate marketing channel. |
||
Line 23: | Line 12: | ||
On December 10, 2002, the [[affiliate networks]] [[Commission Junction]] and [[Performics]] released a Publisher Code of Conduct to guide practices and adherence to [[Ethics|ethical standards]] for [[online advertising]] as a direct result of the meeting the month earlier<ref name=orgcoccj>December 10, 2002, [http://www.cj.com/news/press_releases0102/press_021210.html Online Marketing Service Providers Announce Web Publisher Code of Conduct] (contains original CoC text), ''CJ.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. The other big player at the time, [[LinkShare]] (now a [[Rakuten]] company) did not join the Code of Conduct and published two days later, on December 12, 2002 in [[New York City]], NY, its own version of the Code of Conduct called: “LinkShare's Anti-Predatory Advertising Addendum”<ref name="lsadd">December 12, 2002, [http://www.linkshare.com/press/addendum.html LinkShare's Anti-Predatory Advertising Addendum], ''LinkShare.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. |
On December 10, 2002, the [[affiliate networks]] [[Commission Junction]] and [[Performics]] released a Publisher Code of Conduct to guide practices and adherence to [[Ethics|ethical standards]] for [[online advertising]] as a direct result of the meeting the month earlier<ref name=orgcoccj>December 10, 2002, [http://www.cj.com/news/press_releases0102/press_021210.html Online Marketing Service Providers Announce Web Publisher Code of Conduct] (contains original CoC text), ''CJ.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. The other big player at the time, [[LinkShare]] (now a [[Rakuten]] company) did not join the Code of Conduct and published two days later, on December 12, 2002 in [[New York City]], NY, its own version of the Code of Conduct called: “LinkShare's Anti-Predatory Advertising Addendum”<ref name="lsadd">December 12, 2002, [http://www.linkshare.com/press/addendum.html LinkShare's Anti-Predatory Advertising Addendum], ''LinkShare.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. |
||
==The |
==The Code of Conduct over time== |
||
Many do not consider the Code to be a final solution and consider it only to be a step in the right direction<ref name=clickzcoc>Declan Dunn (January 10, 2003), [http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=1566491 Regulating Chaos, Part 1: Adware and the Affiliate Code of Conduct], ''ClickZ Network'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. CJ amended the Code of Conduct three times (Performics only two times) since its introduction, first [[amendment]] February 10, 2003,<ref name=pf0103>Performics (February 10, 2003), [http://www.performics.com/our_company_files/pr_2_10_03.htm Performics Comments On Its Findings Since Release of Publishers' Code of Conduct], ''Performics.com'', retrieved September 24,2007</ref> second amendment July 25, 2004<ref name=cj0704>Way-Back-Machine at Archive.org [http://web.archive.org/web/20060708220647/http://www.cj.com/code_of_conduct.html Code of Conduct] at CJ.com, July 25, 2004 version</ref> (CJ only, followed by Performics on August 12, 2004) and the third and last amendment May 9, 2007<ref name=coccj0507>May 9, 2007, [http://www.cj.com/code_of_conduct.html Code of Conduct (Update May 9, 2007)], ''CJ.com'' and [http://www.performics.com/docs/code_of_conduct.pdf PDF Version] at ''Performics.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. The last amendment was an unilateral act by Commission Junction. Performics still uses the previous version from 2004, which they updated on 12 August, 2004. This means that there exist three different versions of the original code at the moment, Commission Junctions version from May 2007, the Performics version from 2004 and the LinkShare addendum from 2002. |
Many do not consider the Code to be a final solution and consider it only to be a step in the right direction<ref name=clickzcoc>Declan Dunn (January 10, 2003), [http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=1566491 Regulating Chaos, Part 1: Adware and the Affiliate Code of Conduct], ''ClickZ Network'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. CJ amended the Code of Conduct three times (Performics only two times) since its introduction, first [[amendment]] February 10, 2003,<ref name=pf0103>Performics (February 10, 2003), [http://web.archive.org/web/20060312222709/http://www.performics.com/our_company_files/pr_2_10_03.htm Performics Comments On Its Findings Since Release of Publishers' Code of Conduct], ''Performics.com'' (via WayBackMachine) , retrieved September 24,2007</ref> second amendment July 25, 2004<ref name=cj0704>Way-Back-Machine at Archive.org [http://web.archive.org/web/20060708220647/http://www.cj.com/code_of_conduct.html Code of Conduct] at CJ.com, July 25, 2004 version</ref> (CJ only, followed by Performics on August 12, 2004) and the third and last amendment May 9, 2007<ref name=coccj0507>May 9, 2007, [http://www.cj.com/code_of_conduct.html Code of Conduct (Update May 9, 2007)], ''CJ.com'' and [http://www.performics.com/docs/code_of_conduct.pdf PDF Version] at ''Performics.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref>. The last amendment was an unilateral act by Commission Junction. Performics still uses the previous version from 2004, which they updated on 12 August, 2004. This means that there exist three different versions of the original code at the moment, Commission Junctions version from May 2007, the Performics version from 2004 and the LinkShare addendum from 2002. |
||
The changes to the code are considered bad and weakening the codes effectiveness.<ref name=sjcoc05>Scott Jangro (October 5, 2005), [http://www.jangro.com/cj-psa-changes.htm Comparison of CJ's new and prior Publisher Service Agreements], ''Jangro.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref><ref name=afpcoc07>Kellie Stevens (May 24, 2007), [http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2007/05/24/cj-updates-the-code-of-conduct/ CJ Updates The Code of Conduct], ''AffiliateFairPlay.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref> |
The changes to the code are considered bad and weakening the codes effectiveness.<ref name=sjcoc05>Scott Jangro (October 5, 2005), [http://www.jangro.com/cj-psa-changes.htm Comparison of CJ's new and prior Publisher Service Agreements], ''Jangro.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref><ref name=afpcoc07>Kellie Stevens (May 24, 2007), [http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2007/05/24/cj-updates-the-code-of-conduct/ CJ Updates The Code of Conduct], ''AffiliateFairPlay.com'', retrieved June 26, 2007</ref> |
||
Line 45: | Line 34: | ||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{reflist|2}} |
{{reflist|2}} |
||
==External links== |
|||
[http://www.cumbrowski.com/CodeOfConduct.asp Original Publisher Code of Conduct] and its different versions |
|||
[[Category:Affiliate marketing]] |
[[Category:Affiliate marketing]] |
Revision as of 08:40, 26 January 2008
The Publisher Code of Conduct or Code of Conduct is a guideline for ethical online advertising. It was released by the affiliate networks Commission Junction, now part of ValueClick (NYSE:VCLK), but an independent company at that time, BeFree, a ValueClick company, and Performics, a DoubleClick company, on December 10, 2002. It was created to guide practices and adherence to ethical standards for online advertising in the affiliate marketing industry.
The original code of conduct is titled "Publisher Code of Conduct", because it only included rules that affected publishers or affiliates. Commission Junction extended the code in its fourth amendment to included rules for advertisers (merchants) as well and dropped the word "publisher" from the title.[1] The original core of the code was brief and generic, consisting of only four small paragraphs.[2]
Historic Background
In New York City, New York on November 7, 2002, affiliate marketing industry leaders convened at the Yale Club. They held a debate and fact finding mission to better understand the nature of adware and to assist leading affiliate networks like Commission Junction, BeFree and Performics in preparing a policy that would be fair to all parties[3][4].
The goal of the meeting was to set up a unified standard between the major networks at the time as to what were acceptable methods for affiliates/publishers using adware to operate within the affiliate marketing channel.
On December 10, 2002, the affiliate networks Commission Junction and Performics released a Publisher Code of Conduct to guide practices and adherence to ethical standards for online advertising as a direct result of the meeting the month earlier[2]. The other big player at the time, LinkShare (now a Rakuten company) did not join the Code of Conduct and published two days later, on December 12, 2002 in New York City, NY, its own version of the Code of Conduct called: “LinkShare's Anti-Predatory Advertising Addendum”[5].
The Code of Conduct over time
Many do not consider the Code to be a final solution and consider it only to be a step in the right direction[6]. CJ amended the Code of Conduct three times (Performics only two times) since its introduction, first amendment February 10, 2003,[7] second amendment July 25, 2004[8] (CJ only, followed by Performics on August 12, 2004) and the third and last amendment May 9, 2007[1]. The last amendment was an unilateral act by Commission Junction. Performics still uses the previous version from 2004, which they updated on 12 August, 2004. This means that there exist three different versions of the original code at the moment, Commission Junctions version from May 2007, the Performics version from 2004 and the LinkShare addendum from 2002.
The changes to the code are considered bad and weakening the codes effectiveness.[9][10]
The ”afsrc=1” URL-parameter
The code addresses specifically the behavior of software (desktop software or browser plug-in/BHO) such as shopping plug-ins by rewards and cash-back shopping sites and adware that was bundled with other software programs. In order to comply with the code, was it necessary for that kind of software to implement detection mechanisms to determine if the user clicked on another affiliates link or not and "back off", if it is the case. The software cannot detect affiliate links hidden behind local redirect scripts.
As a solution was the optional "afsrc=1
" URL-parameter introduced. The parameter stands for "affiliate source" and is all lower-case. The parameter is not necessary for normal affiliate links provided by the affiliate networks. [11]
Sample URLs with afsrc=1
parameter
http://www.affiliatesite.com/go.php?id=123&page=home&afsrc=1
http://www.affiliatesite.com/go-merch-123.html?afsrc=1
References
- ^ a b May 9, 2007, Code of Conduct (Update May 9, 2007), CJ.com, retrieved September 25, 2007 Cite error: The named reference "coccj0507" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b December 10, 2002, Online Marketing Service Providers Announce Web Publisher Code of Conduct (contains original CoC text), CJ.com, retrieved June 26, 2007
- ^ Wayne Porter (2005), Code of Conduct and Adware Guidelines, XBlock.com, retrieved June 26, 2007
- ^ November 7, 2002, Meeting Minutes - Performance Marketing Summit, retrieved June 26, 2007
- ^ December 12, 2002, LinkShare's Anti-Predatory Advertising Addendum, LinkShare.com, retrieved June 26, 2007
- ^ Declan Dunn (January 10, 2003), Regulating Chaos, Part 1: Adware and the Affiliate Code of Conduct, ClickZ Network, retrieved June 26, 2007
- ^ Performics (February 10, 2003), Performics Comments On Its Findings Since Release of Publishers' Code of Conduct, Performics.com (via WayBackMachine) , retrieved September 24,2007
- ^ Way-Back-Machine at Archive.org Code of Conduct at CJ.com, July 25, 2004 version
- ^ Scott Jangro (October 5, 2005), Comparison of CJ's new and prior Publisher Service Agreements, Jangro.com, retrieved June 26, 2007
- ^ Kellie Stevens (May 24, 2007), CJ Updates The Code of Conduct, AffiliateFairPlay.com, retrieved June 26, 2007
- ^ Scott Jangro (July 28th, 2005), afsrc=1 Frequently Asked Questions (unofficial), (former BeFree employee who worked on the specs), ‘’Jangro.com’’, retrieved September 25, 2007
External links
Original Publisher Code of Conduct and its different versions