rm COI tag, it's cleaned up |
→Response: +PCLOB, tried to link all the notable orgs |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Josh Orton, a spokesperson for the [[Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign]], stated "This is disgusting. A Sanders administration will ban facial recognition software in law enforcement, period."<ref>{{cite tweet |user=joshorton |number=1218551226327031809 |date=2020-01-18 |title=This is disgusting. A Sanders administration will ban facial recognition software in law enforcement, period.}}</ref> |
Josh Orton, a spokesperson for the [[Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign]], stated "This is disgusting. A Sanders administration will ban facial recognition software in law enforcement, period."<ref>{{cite tweet |user=joshorton |number=1218551226327031809 |date=2020-01-18 |title=This is disgusting. A Sanders administration will ban facial recognition software in law enforcement, period.}}</ref> |
||
Citing the publicity of Clearview after the New York Times report, on January 27 2020, over 40 tech and civil rights organizations including [[Color of Change]], [[Council on American–Islamic Relations]], [[Demand Progress]], [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]], [[Electronic Privacy Information Center]], [[Fight for the Future]], [[Freedom of the Press Foundation]], [[Media Alliance]], [[National Center for Transgender Equality]], [[National Hispanic Media Coalition]], [[National LGBTQ Task Force]], [[Project On Government Oversight]], [[Restore the Fourth]], and the [[Woodhull Freedom Foundation]] sent a letter to the [[Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board]] (PCLOB) and four congressional committees, outlining their concerns with facial recognition and Clearview, asking the PCLOB to suspend the use of facial recognition.<ref name="epic_">{{Cite web |title=EPIC PCLOB letter |author= |work=epic.org |date= |access-date=27 January 2020 |url= https://epic.org/privacy/facerecognition/PCLOB-Letter-FRT-Suspension.pdf}}</ref><ref name="dail_Back">{{Cite web |title=Backlash grows against Clearview as lawsuit looms |author= |work=The Daily Dot |date= |access-date=27 January 2020 |url= https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/clearview-ai-backlash-letter-lawsuit/ |quote=On Monday, the Electronic Privacy Information Center and more than 35 other organizations including Fight for the Future, Demand Progress, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Color of Change, and Free Press Action, sent a letter to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, an independent agency in the executive branch, recommending the suspension of facial recognition systems in the federal government, citing Clearview AI’s relationship with law enforcement. }}</ref><ref name="news_U.S.">{{Cite web |title=U.S. Board Should Seek Facial Recognition Halt, Groups Say (1) |author= |work=news.bloomberglaw.com |date= |access-date=27 January 2020 |url= https://news.bloomberglaw.com/privacy-and-data-security/u-s-board-should-recommend-facial-recognition-halt-groups-say |quote=“Obvious problems with bias and discrimination in the systems” show the need for a moratorium, 40 organizations wrote in a letter to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. }}</ref><ref name="theh_Gove">{{Cite web |title=Government privacy watchdog under pressure to recommend facial recognition ban |author= |work=TheHill |date= |access-date=27 January 2020 |url= https://thehill.com/policy/technology/480152-government-privacy-watchdog-under-pressure-to-recommend-facial-recognition |quote=The letter cited a recent New York Times report about Clearview AI, a company which claims to have a database of more than 3 billion photos and is reportedly collaborating with hundreds of police departments. }}</ref> |
|||
== Founders == |
== Founders == |
Revision as of 23:25, 27 January 2020
![]() | |
Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | Facial recognition |
Founded | 2017 |
Founders | Hoan Ton-That Richard Schwartz |
Headquarters | |
Areas served | United States, Canada |
Website | www |
Clearview AI is an American technology company that provides facial recognition software to law enforcement agencies. The company has developed technology that can match faces to a database of more than three billion images scraped from the Internet.[1] Founded by Hoan Ton-That and Richard Schwartz, the company maintained a low profile until late 2019, when its usage by law enforcement was reported on.[2][1][3]
Clearview's investors include Peter Thiel[1] and Naval Ravikant.[2] Clearview's technology has been used by numerous law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.[1][4][5] Clearview AI has contracted with the New York State Police, as well as several local police departments, including the Atlanta Police Department and the Broward County Sheriff's Office, and has misrepresented its usage at other agencies.[4][2]
History
In late 2017, Clearview (then Smartcheckr) hired a contractor, later doxed as 'Ricky Vaughn', a pseudonym for Douglass Mackey, who is associated with alt-right white supremacist congressional candidate Paul Nehlen. Unbeknownst to Clearview, Vaughn sent a proposal for work to Nehlen titled "Smartcheckr Consulting Group."[6] Clearview claims to have had no knowledge of the contractor's Ricky Vaughn persona, and the technology in the proposal does not exist.[2]
Marketing claims
Clearview's marketing claimed their facial recognition led to a terrorist arrest. The identification was submitted to the New York Police Department tip line, but the NYPD did not use this tip to identify the suspect, and stated they have no institutional relationship with Clearview, though some 'rogue officers' use it.[7][8][9] Clearview claims to have solved two other New York cases and "40 cold cases", later stating they submitted them to tip lines.[2]
Clearview also linked their product to a child predator sting in New Jersey, and used the name and likeness of New Jersey Attorney General Gubir S. Grewal. In a January 24 2020 letter, counsel at the AG's office wrote this appears to violate state and federal laws, demanding Clearview immediately cease and desist. Grewal also banned the use of Clearview by state prosecutors and police, and began an effort to find out where it or similar products had been used. Tor Ekeland, a lawyer for Clearview, confirmed the marketing video was taken down the same day.[10][11][8]
Response
Clearview has been described in the press as "sketchy"[9], "creepy",[12] and as the company "that might end privacy as we know it".[1] Cory Doctorow called it "a creepy, grifty, privacy-invading toolsmith serving authoritarians", also pointing out the unreliability of its marketing.[13]
After discovering Clearview AI was scraping images from their site, Twitter sent a cease-and-desist letter, insisting that they remove all images as it is against Twitter's policies.[14][15] Facebook has said they are reviewing the situation, and Venmo also stated it is against their policies.[15][16][17]
Senator Edward J. Markey wrote Clearview and Ton-That, stating "Widespread use of your technology could facilitate dangerous behavior and could effectively destroy individuals’ ability to go about their daily lives anonymously." Markey asked Clearview to detail aspects of its business to understand these privacy, bias, and security concerns.[15][18]
Senator Ron Wyden tweeted about Clearview, saying it "reads like one of the more disturbing episodes of Black Mirror". Wyden also voiced concerns about Clearview's efforts to "tamp down questions from journalists".[19][20]
Josh Orton, a spokesperson for the Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign, stated "This is disgusting. A Sanders administration will ban facial recognition software in law enforcement, period."[21]
Citing the publicity of Clearview after the New York Times report, on January 27 2020, over 40 tech and civil rights organizations including Color of Change, Council on American–Islamic Relations, Demand Progress, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Fight for the Future, Freedom of the Press Foundation, Media Alliance, National Center for Transgender Equality, National Hispanic Media Coalition, National LGBTQ Task Force, Project On Government Oversight, Restore the Fourth, and the Woodhull Freedom Foundation sent a letter to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) and four congressional committees, outlining their concerns with facial recognition and Clearview, asking the PCLOB to suspend the use of facial recognition.[22][23][24][25]
Founders
Hoan Ton-That (born c. 1989)[1] worked as a software developer at AngelList[when?] prior to founding Clearview AI. Ton-That first gained public notice in 2009, when he created ViddyHo, a website that spammed users' contacts and was described as phishing or a computer worm.[9][26][27][28][29][30] Ton-That denied creating a phishing site and claimed a software bug was the cause.[31] He then created fastforwarded.com, a similar phishing site.[31] He also created an app called "Trump Hair", which placed Donald Trump's hair on photos.[1]
Richard Schwartz (born c. 1959) is a graduate of Columbia University and New York University, holding degrees in History and Public Policy. He began his career working for Henry Stern, when Stern was a member of the New York City Council. Schwartz continued working with Stern during Stern's tenure as New York City Parks Commissioner under New York City Mayor Ed Koch.[32] Schwartz heavily contributed to the 1980s New York City Parks restoration and continued public service under Mayor David Dinkins. He was appointed senior policy advisor to New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani in the 1990s. Schwartz authored the Work Experience Program, a welfare reform program.[32] Schwartz founded Opportunity America, a job matching service for welfare recipients, one day after leaving public service in 1997. He served as Editorial Editor at the New York Daily News in the 2000s, where he was shortlisted for three Pulitzer Prizes. Ton-That and Schwartz met at the Manhattan Institute.[33][1][34]
Clearview AI hired Paul Clement, a former Solicitor General and former acting United States Attorney General to help assuage privacy concerns.[1] Former New York City Police Commissioner and executive chairman of Teneo Risk Chief Bill Bratton challenged privacy concerns and recommended strong procedures for law enforcement usage in an op-ed in New York Daily News.[35]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Hill, Kashmir (2020-01-18). "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-01-18.
- ^ a b c d e "Clearview AI Says Its Facial Recognition Software Identified A Terrorism Suspect. The Cops Say That's Not True". BuzzFeed News. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
As it signed deals, Clearview continued to misrepresent its relationship with the NYPD. It used images of the suspect from the Brooklyn bar beating in an October email sent through CrimeDex, a crime alert listserv used by police across the nation. In that email, which BuzzFeed News obtained via a public records request to the Bradenton, Florida, police department, a random man whose image was taken from an Argentine LinkedIn page is identified as a "possible match." His name, however, does not match the name of the person who turned himself in to the NYPD.
- ^ "Law enforcement is using a facial recognition app with huge privacy issues". Engadget. Retrieved 2020-01-21.
- ^ a b "Records on Clearview AI reveal new info on police use". MuckRock. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
In collaboration with Open The Government, MuckRock requested materials from the largest police departments in the country, including Atlanta, Georgia, which first released records on Clearview AI.
- ^ Brieskorn, Megan Cruz, Katlyn (December 27, 2019). "Florida law enforcement agencies use facial recognition to identify alleged thief". WFTV. Retrieved 2020-01-18.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Christopher Cantwell https://christophercantwell.com/2018/04/08/doxing-and-anonymity/. Retrieved 2020-01-25.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ "How NYPD's facial recognition software ID'ed subway rice cooker kook". New York Post. Retrieved 2020-01-25.
- ^ a b "New Jersey Bars Police From Using Clearview Facial Recognition App". nytimes.com. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
"We've received the attorney general's letter and are complying," said Tor Ekeland, Clearview's lawyer. "The video has been removed."
- ^ a b c "Rogue NYPD cops are using facial recognition app Clearview". New York Post. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
Rogue NYPD officers are using a sketchy facial recognition software on their personal phones that the department's own facial recognition unit doesn't want to touch because of concerns about security and potential for abuse, The Post has learned.
- ^ "New Jersey cops told to halt all use of controversial facial-recognition technology". nj. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
Tor Ekeland, a Clearview lawyer, wrote in an email that they would take the video down, and it was no longer at the top of the company's website Friday evening.
- ^ "Cease and Desist" (PDF). int.nyt.com. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
- ^ Morse, Jack (24 January 2020). "New Jersey halts police use of creepy Clearview AI facial-recognition app". Mashable. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
- ^ "The answer to the Clearview AI scandal is better privacy laws, not anti-scraping laws". Boing Boing. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
Nevertheless, Clearview is a creepy, grifty, privacy-invading toolsmith serving authoritarians, getting rich by covertly supplying its overhyped tools, and, unsurprisingly, lots of people (including me) want structural changes to make Clearview cut it out and prevent future Clearviews from emerging.
- ^ "Controversial facial recognition firm Clearview AI facing legal claims after damning NYT report". The Verge. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
Clearview is also facing challenges from platforms in the wake of the NYT report. Twitter has sent Clearview a cease-and-desist letter demanding that the company stop scraping its platform for photos to include in its database. Twitter also demanded the company delete any existing data it may have obtained from the platform because using it to fill out a third-party database without user consent is against Twitter's policies. Clearview has acknowledged publicly that it built out its database in part by scraping social media profiles.
- ^ a b c "Twitter Tells Facial Recognition Trailblazer to Stop Using Site's Photos". nytimes.com. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
Twitter sent a letter this week to the small start-up company, Clearview AI, demanding that it stop taking photos and any other data from the social media website "for any reason" and delete any data that it previously collected, a Twitter spokeswoman said. The cease-and-desist letter, sent on Tuesday, accused Clearview of violating Twitter's policies.
- ^ "Twitter demands AI company stops 'collecting faces'". BBC News. 23 January 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Matsakis, Louise. "Scraping the Web Is a Powerful Tool. Clearview AI Abused It". Wired. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
Automated scraping violates the policies of sites like Facebook and Twitter, the latter of which specifically prohibits scraping to build facial recognition databases. Twitter sent a letter to Clearview this week asking it to stop pilfering data from the site "for any reason," and Facebook is also reportedly examining the matter, according to the Times. But it's unclear whether they have any legal recourse in the current system.
- ^ int.nyt.com https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6718-sen-markey-letter-to-clearview/33422997119c3d43033d/optimized/full.pdf#page=1. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ @RonWyden (January 19, 2020). "This story reads like one of the more disturbing episodes of Black Mirror. Americans have a right to know whether their personal photos are secretly being sucked into a private facial recognition database" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ @RonWyden (January 19, 2020). "It's extremely troubling that this company may have monitored usage specifically to tamp down questions from journalists about the legality of their app. Everyday we witness a growing need for strong federal laws to protect Americans' privacy" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ @joshorton (January 18, 2020). "This is disgusting. A Sanders administration will ban facial recognition software in law enforcement, period" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ "EPIC PCLOB letter" (PDF). epic.org. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
- ^ "Backlash grows against Clearview as lawsuit looms". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
On Monday, the Electronic Privacy Information Center and more than 35 other organizations including Fight for the Future, Demand Progress, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Color of Change, and Free Press Action, sent a letter to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, an independent agency in the executive branch, recommending the suspension of facial recognition systems in the federal government, citing Clearview AI's relationship with law enforcement.
- ^ "U.S. Board Should Seek Facial Recognition Halt, Groups Say (1)". news.bloomberglaw.com. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
"Obvious problems with bias and discrimination in the systems" show the need for a moratorium, 40 organizations wrote in a letter to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.
- ^ "Government privacy watchdog under pressure to recommend facial recognition ban". TheHill. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
The letter cited a recent New York Times report about Clearview AI, a company which claims to have a database of more than 3 billion photos and is reportedly collaborating with hundreds of police departments.
- ^ "The person behind a privacy nightmare has a familiar face". SFChronicle.com. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
I wrote about Ton-That in February 2009 ("scathingly," Hill writes), when he was living in San Francisco, developing first Facebook and then iPhone apps. He made the news for creating ViddyHo, a website that tricked users into sharing access to their Gmail accounts — a hacking technique known as "phishing" — and then spammed their contacts on the Google Talk chat app. (The episode does not appear on Ton-That's sanitized personal website.)
- ^ "Phishing Attacks Increase After Gmail Outage". Redorbit. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
San Francisco police are searching for a man who reportedly registered the ViddyHo domain under the name Cam-Hoan Ton-That.
- ^ Snyder, Gabriel. "ViddyHo Worm Sweeping Through IM". Gawker. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
Here's a bit of a public service announcement: If someone asks you over IM to "Hey check out this video!" they foolishly fell for the just-breaking ViddyHo virus. Don't follow them.
- ^ Thomas, Owen. "Was an 'Anarcho-Transexual Afro-Chicano' Behind the IM Worm?". Gawker. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
Ton-That frequently posted on Twitter about going to Sugarlump, an overwroughtly hip San Francisco "coffee lounge" in a rough-hewn but gentrifying corner of the Mission District, the preferred neighborhood of twentysomething Web developers. HappyAppy's office address is listed as 25 Stillman Street, a classically South of Market location for a startup. (In fact, it was once the home of Socializr, Friendster founder Jonathan Abrams's current company.)
- ^ "Internet Worm Linked to San Francisco Man | News | The Harvard Crimson". thecrimson.com. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
The site Venture Hacks lists Hoan Ton-That as the sole member of HappyAppy Inc, a relationship that was confirmed by Hoan's lawyer, Andre Gharakhanian of Silicon Legal Strategy.
- ^ a b Thomas, Owen. "'Anarcho-Transexual' Hacker Returns with New Scam Site". Gawker. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
Fastforwarded.com
- ^ a b "Who Cleans the Park?". Google Books. Retrieved 2020-01-25.
- ^ "A Maximus Postscript | The Village Voice". villagevoice.com. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
In addition to obtaining special access to Turner, Hevesi charged, Maximus had an added edge because of its alliance with Schwartz, Giuliani's former senior adviser and the man who had shaped the administration's welfare policies. After leaving City Hall in 1997, Schwartz had started a new for-profit firm, Opportunity America, to help place welfare recipients in jobs. Schwartz won work with government and private businesses and later also enlisted to work with Maximus on its HRA contracts. His share of the contracts was expected to be worth about $30 million, records showed.
- ^ "The Welfare Estate". City Limits. 1 June 1999. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
Then, on February 11, 1997, at age 38, Richard Schwartz announced he was leaving city government. The next day, he founded Opportunity America. His specialty would be corporate matchmaker, the missing link to help private-sector companies hire welfare recipients. But he promised in The New York Times that he wouldn't take advantage of his government experience to win consulting contracts with New York City.
- ^ "Face recognition is not the enemy". New York Daily News. 26 January 2020. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)