Content deleted Content added
m moved Category talk:Cult related books to Category talk:Cult-related books: Robot - Speedily moving category Cult related books to Category:Cult-related books per CFDS. |
MilesMoney (talk | contribs) →Have been called: new section |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==List would be useful as well== |
==List would be useful as well== |
||
*At some point, a related list would be useful as well. In this manner, the list could be much more inclusive than the category, and could elaborate briefly on specific methodologies and leanings of the various books. Yours, [[User:Smeelgova|Smeelgova]] 07:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC). |
*At some point, a related list would be useful as well. In this manner, the list could be much more inclusive than the category, and could elaborate briefly on specific methodologies and leanings of the various books. Yours, [[User:Smeelgova|Smeelgova]] 07:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC). |
||
== Have been called == |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Cult-related_books&diff=581420291&oldid=445303780 This] added "groups that have been called" to the definition. I support it because it allows us to avoid using Wikipedia's voice to say that these ''are'' cults. Rather, we add books that are reliable sources on groups that reliable sources have identified as cults. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 22:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:40, 28 December 2013
Religion: New religious movements Category‑class | ||||||||||
|
Expansion, populate request
- Wikipedia should, in my opinion, contain more articles about books that would fit into this category. And specifically, I am referring to books from both the anti-cult movement and cult apologist camps, as well as books on specific cults and historical books on cult leaders. In this manner, when these books are used as secondary references within other Wikipedia articles on the subject, the reader will not have to go leave Wikipedia to get more information on that particular reference. Yours, Smeelgova 07:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC).
List would be useful as well
- At some point, a related list would be useful as well. In this manner, the list could be much more inclusive than the category, and could elaborate briefly on specific methodologies and leanings of the various books. Yours, Smeelgova 07:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC).
Have been called
This added "groups that have been called" to the definition. I support it because it allows us to avoid using Wikipedia's voice to say that these are cults. Rather, we add books that are reliable sources on groups that reliable sources have identified as cults. MilesMoney (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)