Content deleted Content added
KimDabelsteinPetersen (talk | contribs) Reverted to revision 358726839 by ChrisO; rv Coatrack and puffing. Including BLP material not in citations given.. using TW |
DarknessShines2 (talk | contribs) remove merge tags per talk page consensus |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled --> |
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled --> |
||
{{Merge to|The Hockey Stick Illusion|date=April 2010}} |
|||
{{AfDM|page=Bishop Hill (blog)|year=2010|month=April|day=22|substed=yes|help=off}} |
{{AfDM|page=Bishop Hill (blog)|year=2010|month=April|day=22|substed=yes|help=off}} |
||
<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdmulti|page=Bishop Hill (blog)|date=22 April 2010|result='''keep'''}} --> |
<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdmulti|page=Bishop Hill (blog)|date=22 April 2010|result='''keep'''}} --> |
Revision as of 18:46, 28 April 2010
Type of site | Blog |
---|---|
Created by | Andrew Montford |
URL | http://bishophill.squarespace.com/ |
Bishop Hill is a widely-read blog operated by Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion.[1]
A post on the blog led to the resignation of Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature from the Independent Climate Change Email Review headed by Sir Muir Russell.[specify][2]
External links
References
- ^ Webster, Ben (2010-03-23). "Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, 'has a conflict of interest'". timesonline.co.uk. The Times. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a "direct financial interest in the outcome" of his inquiry.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)