Content deleted Content added
Ramazzini research showed increase in cancer, therefore we have to include that |
→Ramazzini Foundation: valid source, take it to Talk if you disagree |
||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
In June 2007, 12 U.S. environmental health experts wrote a letter to the FDA to urge them to immediately commence a careful review of the Ramazzini study. The letter stated it raised new |
In June 2007, 12 U.S. environmental health experts wrote a letter to the FDA to urge them to immediately commence a careful review of the Ramazzini study. The letter stated it raised new |
||
serious questions about the safety of the artificial sweetener aspartame.<ref>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/sci;317/5834/29c?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Souring+on+Fake+Sugar&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&issue=5834&resourcetype=HWCIT Science 6 July 2007</ref><ref>http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/aspartame_letter_to_fda.pdf</ref> |
serious questions about the safety of the artificial sweetener aspartame.<ref>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/sci;317/5834/29c?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Souring+on+Fake+Sugar&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&issue=5834&resourcetype=HWCIT Science 6 July 2007</ref><ref>http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/aspartame_letter_to_fda.pdf</ref> |
||
As a result of the Ramazzini study, for the first time CSPI (Center For Science in the Public Interest) downgraded aspartame on its online Chemical Cuisine directory from a "use caution" rating to "everyone should avoid."<ref>http://www.cspinet.org/new/200706251.html</ref><ref>http://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm</ref> |
|||
===National Cancer Institute=== |
===National Cancer Institute=== |