I was unaware that Leifern was you, Ombudsman. However, you haven't responded to the addressing of your concerns. Perhaps you should do that first. And then consider the NPOV tag instead; it could fit |
m the pov is egregious enough that three editors have corroborated the anon's tag; the concerns might have been addressed directly edits, instead of defending the pov, which might have precluded the AfD |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:Pages for deletion]] |
[[Category:Pages for deletion]] |
||
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --> |
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --> |
||
{{totally disputed}} |
|||
{{cleanup}} |
|||
'''Anti-vaccinationists'''. This article deals with those who, on principled or other grounds, are opposed to [[vaccination]]. Since the early 19th century, when vaccination became a standard part of [[public health]] and [[medicine]], there have been groups and individuals who are most clearly characterised as anti-vaccinationists opposing such policies. |
'''Anti-vaccinationists'''. This article deals with those who, on principled or other grounds, are opposed to [[vaccination]]. Since the early 19th century, when vaccination became a standard part of [[public health]] and [[medicine]], there have been groups and individuals who are most clearly characterised as anti-vaccinationists opposing such policies. |
||
Revision as of 05:36, 3 February 2006
Template:Totally disputed Anti-vaccinationists. This article deals with those who, on principled or other grounds, are opposed to vaccination. Since the early 19th century, when vaccination became a standard part of public health and medicine, there have been groups and individuals who are most clearly characterised as anti-vaccinationists opposing such policies.
The focus of the article is their identity as a group or class, and the genesis and evolution of the repeating arguments, which have shown limited change with time and according to the specific vaccines discussed. These constitute and are discussed as a distinct topic rather than as part of the discussion of infectious diseases and their control.
Technical detail such as the timing of vaccinations are discussed in vaccine_schedules and elsewhere and are outwith the intended topic.
Wolfe and Sharp (2002) argue that between the 19th and 20th century the arguments against vaccination used by anti-vaccinationists remained essentially unchanged.
Time course
Widespread vaccination began in the early 1800s, after Edward Jenner. The public health is a concern of communities, and modern states assert an interest in and authority over certain aspects of it. In the UK, Vaccination Acts of 1840 to 1853 made vaccination compulsory. The British state at that time was neither particularly paternalistic/authoritarian, nor particularly laissez-faire, ergo, this was a response to a matter regarded of grave importance. (Among other elements of the legislation, variolation which is less effective and more hazardous than vaccination, was banned.)
Nothing less would drive such a change in the relationship of state and subject.
A prompt backlash occurred, initially focussed on compulsion, which after a time settled on arguments that the vaccine was dangerous or ineffective. After that argument was won, large-scale vaccination having been conducted, arguments on the latter grounds continued to be presented. Deep within them is a view of the world which both rejects such scientific conclusions as the germ theory of Pasteur, and advances as true alternatives which have been discarded by most scientists active in the relevant fields.
In the United States, smallpox outbreaks had become contained by the latter half of the 19th century. Vaccination had been widespread in the early part the century, and before that smallpox had been widespread. Vaccination then fell into disuse. In the 1870s the disease became epidemic, the population therefore being demonstrated to be susceptible.
Anti-vaccination activity also increased in the United States in the latter part of the 19th century. In 1879, after a visit to New York by William Tebb, the leading British anti-vaccinationist, the Anti-Vaccination Society of America was founded. Subsequently, the New England Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League was formed in 1882 and the Anti-Vaccination League of New York City in 1885.
Initial arguments
When vaccination was introduced into UK public policy, and adoption followed overseas, both vaccination and inoculation were condemned by the Protestant and Catholic churches[citation needed]. Yale president Timothy Dwight IV held that vaccination thwarted God's will, saying[citation needed]:
- If God had decreed from all eternity that a certain person should die of smallpox, it would be a frightful sin to avoid and annul that decree by the trick of vaccination.
British theologian Edward Massey published The Dangerous and Sinful Practice of Inoculation in 1772. Several Boston clergymen and devout physicians, believing that "the law of God prohibits the practice," formed the Anti-vaccination Society. Some others complained that the practice was unnatural and dangerous, going so far as to demand that doctors that carried out these procedures be tried for attempted murder.[citation needed]
Character of anti-vaccinationist material
Anti-vaccination writing, and writing by anti-vaccinationists, on the Web and previously on paper, is characterised by a number of distinct differences from medical and other scientific literature. As well as the underlying thesis to argue and subtle elements of style better analysed by a professor of English, these include:
- promiscuous copying and reduplication[citation needed]
- Tendency to be without corrections, even when an initial report is shown to be false (eg Donnegan and Schreiber references below)
- Deficiency of references to allow readers, should they wish, to check sources [citation needed]
- Personal and sometimes scurrilous attacks on individual doctors
- An underlying acceptance that, 'of course', the whole of medicine is aimed at doing harm, eg whale.to/a/medical_mafia.html
- carefully dishonest arguments
In addition, there is a considerable overlap with homeopathy and conspiracy theorists, and a subset of the material shades into the appearance of psychosis.[citation needed]
An example of a carefully dishonest argument would be to move from the claimed - that immunisation reduces disease - to dismissing immunisation as ineffective, since it has not eliminated any disease. Even this only works until 1979, when Smallpox was eradicated, or at most contemporary time when polio having been eliminated as distinct from eradicated, in the USA and UK, the change from a live vaccine to a killed one occurs.
See Mendelsohn quote below
The People
Organisations wholly or largely existing to oppose immunisation
Historical
The initial aims and results of the early movements:- In the UK vaccination was provided free and Variolation outlawed from 1840 under the Vaccination Act. Widespread or orgnaised resistance or protest is not reported at that time.
1873 Act: In 1873 a further Vaccination Act made vaccination compulsory. Records of the reasoning for this are not widely available. However it is apparent that soon after this there was considerable resistance to the compulsion, and this grew. In 1885 a Royal Commission sat, following riots in Leicester and reported 7 years later, recommending the abolition of cumulative penalties. A new Vaccination Act in 1898 removed cumulative penalties and introduced a conscience clause, allowing parents who did not believe vaccination was efficacious or safe to obtain a certificate of exemption. This act introduced the important concept of the "conscientious objector" into English law.
The aims of the protestors and organisations had thus been achieved in 1898.
Organisations
Name | Started | Finished | Location | Membership | Unique Proposition | Notes | |
Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League | 1866 | 1880 (segue) | Mr. R. B. Gibbs (d. 1871) started it [citation needed]. Revived 1876, President: Rev. W. Hume-Rothery | ||||
London Society for the Abolition of Compulsory Vaccination | 1880 | 1896 (segue) | Victoria Street, Westminster, London | Secretary: Mr. William Young. Adopted The Vaccination Inquirer established 1879 William Tebb as the organ of the Society.
Published:-
The movement grew [citation needed] and the London Society soon became national so reformed as ... | |||
National Anti-Vaccination League | 1896 (Feb) | before 1970? | England |
objectives:—
The entire repeal of the Vaccination Acts; the disestablishment and disendowment of the practice of vaccination; and the abolition of all regulations in regard to vaccination as conditions, of employment in State Departments, or of admission to Educational, or other Institutions.[citation needed] |
|||
Anti-vaccination Society | mid-C19 | Boston USA | "the law of god prohibits the practice," [citation needed] | ||||
A rather separate organisation with a general anti-vaccination view but with other more significant characteristics was the Nazi party. http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg18725131.600
Current
Since the reversion from compulsory immunisation in the UK, (... other states...) opposition has continued, albeit at a low level and with the termination of the national organisations set up to oppose compulsion (see their charters).
This opposition could no longer focus upon the abridgement of vicarious individual liberty - the right to determine what is done to one's children - and adopted the arguments that immunisation did not have an effect; that it had an effect but the effect was overwhelmingly bad; or that although immunisation had a beneficial effect that beneficial effect was less than lifelong and produced perverse consequences.
This was a change of ground and toward hypotheses that in theory require evidence and are susceptible to disproof rather than the philosophical questions of the relationship of individuals to state or deity. Accordingly, scientific investigation has been undertaken, and also accordingly subsidiary arguments essentially consisting of the serial assertion that each scientific investigation which did not prove one of those hyptheses had been incorrectly designed, conducted, interpreted or punctuated and spelled.
General
Specific People
Name Qualification Dates Medical Practitioner? |
Biog | peer-reviewed publications |
Other (vacc related)Pubs | Notes | ||||
|
Reportedly sometime academic at Comenius University Bratislava | One: Tye K, Pollard I, Karlsson L, Scheibner V, Tye G. Caffeine exposure in utero increases the incidence of apnea in adult rats. Reprod Toxicol 1993;7:449–52 | Book: Scheibner V. Vaccination: 100 years of orthodox research shows
that vaccines represent a medical assault on the immune system. Blackheath (NSW): Viera Scheibner; 1993. |
a peer reviewed paper about her [UToronto.ca (pdf) - 'Public opponents of vaccination: a case study", Julie Leask, Peter McIntyre, National Centre for Immunization Research & Survellance, University of Sydney
Vaccine, vol 21, p 4700-4703 (2003) PMID 14585678 ] | ||||
|
Stood up in Court and told a judge that several papers supported her arguments. He read them. They didn't. She was obliged to agree with this in open court[1].
"... The judge found this doctor guilty of using "selective quotations", of making "unsubstantiated claims", and of "being confused in her thinking, lacking logic, minimising the duration of a disease, making statements lacking valid facts, ignoring the facts, ignoring the conclusion of papers, making implications without any scientific validation, giving a superficial impression of a paper, not presenting the counter argument, quoting selectively from papers, and of providing in one instance no data and no facts to support her claim". It was Dr Donegan's evidence that Lord Justice Sedley dismissed as "junk science" at the subsequent appeal. Yet 12 months later, thanks to the flourishing network of anti-immunisation parents' groups out there, Dr Donegan's junk science is readily available to anyone trying to make informed decisions about vaccinations. ..." [0] http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/0000000CA6F2.htm [1] http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2003/1376.html [2] http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2003/1148.html
| |||||||
|
||||||||
Charles Creighton | ||||||||
Neil Miller | ||||||||
Barbara Loe Fisher | ||||||||
Walter Hadwen | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||
Gerhard Buchwald | ||||||||
|
English | Website: whale.to | a large and slightly sorted collection of conspiracy theory save the whale, illuminati, weird "science" and stuff whcih is not corrected to reflect demonstarated mistakes. |
The State
"Vaccination is unique among de facto mandatory requirements in the modern era, requiring individuals to accept the injection of a medicine or medicinal agent into their bodies, and it has provoked a spirited opposition. This opposition began with the first vaccinations, has not ceased, and probably never will. From this realisation arises a difficult issue: how should the mainstream medical authorities approach the anti-vaccination movement? A passive reaction could be construed as endangering the health of society, whereas a heavy handed approach can threaten the values of individual liberty and freedom of expression that we cherish." BMJ
Some of the United States in America make no requirement for immunisation, but a legislative requirement for immunisation before admission to school, and another for schooling. An overlap between followers of contemporary anti-vaccinationists and home-schoolers must arise from this.
Anti-Vaccinists quotes
- "The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization.....There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease."--Dr Robert Mendelsohn, M.D (Ref: How To Raise Your Child In Spite Of Your Doctor)
- "I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realize that this is not so."--Dr Archie Kalokerinos MD (Interview---- International Vaccine Newsletter June 1995 [2])
- "The 'victory over epidemics' was not won by medical science or by doctors--and certainly not by vaccines.....the decline...has been the result of technical, social and hygienic improvements and especially of improved nutrition.....the claim that vaccinations are the cause for the decline of infectious diseases is utter nonsense."--Dr. med. Gerhard Buchwald (Ref: The Vaccination Nonsense. ISBN 3-8334-2508-3 page 108.)
Publications
- 1884 Compulsory Vaccination in England by William Tebb [3]
- 1898 VACCINATION A DELUSION by Alfred Russel Wallace [4]
- 1936 The Case AGAINST Vaccination By M. Beddow Bayly M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. [5]
- 1951 The Truth About Vaccination and Immunization by Lily Loat [6]
- 1957 THE POISONED NEEDLE by Eleanor McBean [7]
- 1990 UNIVERSAL IMMUNIZATION Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage By Dr. Raymond Obomsawin [8]
Anti-Vaccinationist Assertions
(See also Vaccine_controversy)
table section 1
This is a list of the essential assertions of anti-vaccinators:
By essential, we mean, as a consensus: ....... |
First By |
Supplementary | These are a list of responses | first published ;in | |
|
*unquantified danger to diseases and immunisations can always allow changing the grounds... | ||||
|
How dangerous are the diseases (A-v view)? |
complication rates in children - to follow Prove specific benefits from the specific infections Necessary: in the absence of them, demonstrate harm occurs; supposing harm occurs, could it be averted by causing infection unnaturally?; supposing it could, could most or all the harm be averted by unnaturally causing infection with a weakened version of the disease in question, or providing exposure to the products of such infection?; if not, why not? |
table section 2
This is a list of the essential assertions of anti-vaccinators: | First; By | Supplementary | These are a list of responses | first published ;in | |
|
|||||
|
Calculate the numbers involved in a 99.4% decline in deaths after vaccination (in E&W). There is an asymptotic process here, with successive reductions taking more effort. |
||||
Smallpox has been eliminated. Much of the world has abject poverty still Polio is vastly decreased, immunisation is part of the process, when immunisation was interrupted in the Kano state of Nigeria in 2003, Polio increased. |
|||||
|
|
Morbidity and mortality of several diseases are greater than anti-vaccinationist writings make clear |
table section 3
|
|||||
|
The US government is run by the oil industry
Google indicates many thousand pages of anti-vaccinationism |
||||
**Unhealthy, and/or malnourished children should not be vaccinated (ie most third world children). | While there is malnutrition and ill-health in the Third World, it is a grotesque exaggeration to suggest this is most children. It is seriously inconsistent to suggest that vaccination is not needed for the properly nourished, but that the poorly nourished should not receive it. |
||||
|
This falls into the category of natural experiments
|
||||
Also:
|
First said by, and in | Supplementary info
|
responses |
||
|
Pasteur's demonstration is repeatable and his explanation well-established. Bechamp was wrong. |
||||
|
says... | Supp
|
The Welcome Foundation is a not-for-profit Vaccine production in Cuba is not highly profitable.([19] cover) Experiments test hypotheses. emotional polemic, and yet immunisations are not confined to children. The world is full of lawyers. They don't think so. |
||
|
State by state, and for other countries, this is susceptible to factual testing and citing laws... |
This is demonstrably untrue of Georgia, US http://public.doe.k12.ga.us/askdoe.aspx?PageReq=ASKNewcomer (viewed Feb 2006) |
|||
|
Dr Dunbar |
Present knowledge of the immune system allows us to make successful matched bone-marrow transplants and do many other clever things requiring an understanding. Package inserts are heavily regulated in the UK |
|||
In on-line responses, fora and WP
Responses to papers or reports of scientific or political enquiry in the BMJ attract responses deploying arguments of the usual types and in the usual fashion from a small population of frequent responders.
On WP similar behaviour is demonstrated, as can be seen in the history of various articles, for instance Mumps.
Attacks on a Broad Front
Many attacks are made, not apparently on vaccination itself, but on some individual component of a vaccine or of the social arrangements around it, but appear from the association of the people involved to be anti-vaccinationist activity, rather than as may be asserted, for instance, an effort to improve the safety of vaccines. If an overlap with another group who have an interest in discrediting the use of some technique can be found, the tactic seems likely to generate even more activity.
Thimerosal
An example involves Thiomersal (US: Thimerosal).
Recently, but largely in the US, it has been suggested that thimerosal in childhood vaccines could contribute to autism etc. This claim rests on the organic mercury content of the chemical. Government pharmaceutical companies clearly have an interest in denying this, and there are potentially gains for litigants if a connection can be shown in court.
It is accepted by all sides in the debate that the substance is being phased out, and vaccines in use in the UK are largely free of it.
The 2004 IOM panel favoured rejecting any causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.
- For considerable detail see Thimerosal controversy For information about its chemical properties, see thimerosal
See also
Anti-vaccine websites
- Vaccination.org.uk which is essentially a clone of the vaccination material of whale.to [22]
- VRAN (Canada)
- AVN (Australia)
- Vaccination Liberation (USA)
Websites commenting upon them
References
- Wolfe RM, Sharp LK. Anti-vaccinationists past and present. BMJ 2002;325:430-2. Fulltext. PMID 12193361.
- The Anti-Immunization Activists: A Pattern of Deception - Ed Friedlander, MD