→Ways to improve Yvette Prieto: new section |
TonyBallioni (talk | contribs) Adding General Sanctions Notice (cry) (TW) Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
'''<span style="font-family: Courier; font-weight: bold">[[User:DrStrauss|<span style="color: blue">Dr</span><span style="color: darkblue">Strauss</span>]] [[User talk:DrStrauss|<span style="color: purple">talk</span>]]</span>''' 11:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC) |
'''<span style="font-family: Courier; font-weight: bold">[[User:DrStrauss|<span style="color: blue">Dr</span><span style="color: darkblue">Strauss</span>]] [[User talk:DrStrauss|<span style="color: purple">talk</span>]]</span>''' 11:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
==Important Notice== |
|||
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
A community discussion has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to [[blockchain]] and [[cryptocurrencies]].<br>The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies|here]]. |
|||
All articles related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, are placed under '''[[WP:1RR]]''' (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume an edit is related and so is a revert.<br /> |
|||
Any uninvolved administrator may, at his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.<br /> |
|||
Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard. |
|||
[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 18:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:14, 13 June 2018
Nomination of Primecoin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primecoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primecoin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --benlisquareT•C•E 10:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Primecoin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primecoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primecoin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citation Needed | Talk 13:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Primecoin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primecoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primecoin (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Primecoin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primecoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primecoin (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guttersville (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Primecoin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primecoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primecoin (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citation Needed | Talk 00:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Rdjere. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Ways to improve Yvette Prieto
Hi, I'm DrStrauss. Rdjere, thanks for creating Yvette Prieto!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, thanks for your article. While I think it satisfies our notability standards, the personal life section probably needs cutting down and more needs to be said about her modelling career.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
DrStrauss talk 11:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Important Notice
Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
All articles related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, are placed under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume an edit is related and so is a revert.
Any uninvolved administrator may, at his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.
Template:Z33 TonyBallioni (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)