Salvidrim! (talk | contribs) →Past/future Arbs: new section |
→Past/future Arbs: reply |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{ping|Euryalus}} Assuming this isn't voted on and finalized before the end of the year (PD being due to be posted 29-Dec this seems likely....), there was previously some talk about the potential of current Arbs not continuing on this case after 1st-Jan and/or of newly elected Arbs joining the case. I assume y'all are discussing the topic already but I'm posting here because in Callanecc's announcement he said this was where an announcement would be made. If Arbs want some time off for the Holidays of course y'all have earned it and family should always be more important than Wikipedia :p <span style="font-size:12pt;background:black;padding:1px 4px">[[User:Salvidrim!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:white">Ben · Salvidrim!</span>]] [[User talk:Salvidrim|<span style="color:white">✉</span>]]</span> 20:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC) |
{{ping|Euryalus}} Assuming this isn't voted on and finalized before the end of the year (PD being due to be posted 29-Dec this seems likely....), there was previously some talk about the potential of current Arbs not continuing on this case after 1st-Jan and/or of newly elected Arbs joining the case. I assume y'all are discussing the topic already but I'm posting here because in Callanecc's announcement he said this was where an announcement would be made. If Arbs want some time off for the Holidays of course y'all have earned it and family should always be more important than Wikipedia :p <span style="font-size:12pt;background:black;padding:1px 4px">[[User:Salvidrim!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:white">Ben · Salvidrim!</span>]] [[User talk:Salvidrim|<span style="color:white">✉</span>]]</span> 20:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
:{{replyto|Salvidrim!}} Thanks for that. There actually isn't any current discussion about delaying the case; I think people are just waiting for the PD. As a personal view it's great there's been so much workshop participation, but I reckon the PD will be a fair bit shorter. |
|||
:I also reckon we're on track for a PD on December 29, but inevitably the voting will carry over until the new year. Unless the outgoing committee members specifically request to stay active on this case (and none have so far) then their votes won't be counted. Cases that cross years can make for some odd vote tallies (eg. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Proposed_decision|Gamergate]] had 14 active and 5 inactive arbitrators) but it all works out in the end. -- [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 20:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:50, 23 December 2017
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
Past/future Arbs
@Euryalus: Assuming this isn't voted on and finalized before the end of the year (PD being due to be posted 29-Dec this seems likely....), there was previously some talk about the potential of current Arbs not continuing on this case after 1st-Jan and/or of newly elected Arbs joining the case. I assume y'all are discussing the topic already but I'm posting here because in Callanecc's announcement he said this was where an announcement would be made. If Arbs want some time off for the Holidays of course y'all have earned it and family should always be more important than Wikipedia :p Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 20:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Salvidrim!: Thanks for that. There actually isn't any current discussion about delaying the case; I think people are just waiting for the PD. As a personal view it's great there's been so much workshop participation, but I reckon the PD will be a fair bit shorter.
- I also reckon we're on track for a PD on December 29, but inevitably the voting will carry over until the new year. Unless the outgoing committee members specifically request to stay active on this case (and none have so far) then their votes won't be counted. Cases that cross years can make for some odd vote tallies (eg. Gamergate had 14 active and 5 inactive arbitrators) but it all works out in the end. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)