Content deleted Content added
Just Step Sideways (talk | contribs) →User:Doncram: Not done. On it's face you appear to easily qualify for this right, however, it has been barely ten days since an arbcom-imposed content restriction on you was suspended, and it appears to be directly related to page creation. That's... |
Just Step Sideways (talk | contribs) →User:Kavdiamanju: done (using responseHelper) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* {{rfplinks|1=Kavdiamanju}} |
* {{rfplinks|1=Kavdiamanju}} |
||
:This right will save burden from the new page reviewers to patrol my created pages. [[User:Kavdiamanju|Kavdiamanju]] ([[User talk:Kavdiamanju|talk]]) 14:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC) |
:This right will save burden from the new page reviewers to patrol my created pages. [[User:Kavdiamanju|Kavdiamanju]] ([[User talk:Kavdiamanju|talk]]) 14:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC) |
||
::{{done}} [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 01:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
====[[User:Doncram]]==== |
====[[User:Doncram]]==== |
Revision as of 01:38, 16 November 2016
Autopatrolled
( • view requests)
User:Kavdiamanju
- Kavdiamanju (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- This right will save burden from the new page reviewers to patrol my created pages. Kavdiamanju (talk) 14:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Done Beeblebrox (talk) 01:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
User:Doncram
- Doncram (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- To keep down the NPP backlog. I may as well request this as I have requested the new NPP right just now. It seems silly that my own new redirects and other new article creations have been requiring others to review them. I am an experienced editor with >100,000 edits. If I recall correctly, this right was removed from my account back in 2012 or so, during a period in which I was in conflict with the editor who removed the right. And if I recall correctly, I didn't understand that they did that, and when i put in a routine request for the right to be restored, there was some bureaucratic reasoning being applied at the time by others: "if you request this right then it should be denied". The underlying conflict is long over, and it does seem wasteful to add to the backlog with my own fairly frequent redirect creations and article creations. doncram 01:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Not done On the face of it, you appear to easily qualify for this right. However, it has been barely ten days since an arbcom-imposed content restriction on you was suspended, and it appears to be directly related to page creation. That's a bit too recent in my opinion, although I do note that you have been creating valid articles. Keep doing what you're doing and we can reconsider this once a little more time has passed with no further issues. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)